A two-week campaign was performed in a naturally ventilated apartment to quantify indoor sources and to estimate the total inhaled mass of particulate matter (PM). DustTrak photometers were used to record PM2.5 concentrations continuously. Indoor activities were recorded in a detailed time–activity diary. The results showed that short episodic indoor sources influenced the indoor PM concentration for several hours and significantly affected daily average PM2.5 concentrations, indoor/outdoor ratios and indoor/outdoor correlation coefficients. Activities leading to increased PM concentrations occurred in 9% of the total time monitored, and accounted for 68% of the total PM concentration. Among the many indoor activities recorded, smoking and hair spraying were the strongest sources of fine aerosol. The outcomes of cooking episodes were the most variable in terms of duration and aerosol levels. The calculated inhaled mass corresponded to the source strength but not to the duration of the source activity. The total mass of aerosol potentially inhaled by an adult individual during the time outside the episodes was 1367 µg and during the episodes 2895 µg. During one hour, one person potentially inhaled approximately 36 µg and 294 µg of aerosol for the non-episode and the episode periods, respectively.
EcholsSLMacintoshDLHammerstromKARyanB. Temporal variability of microenvironmental time budgets in Maryland. J Exposure Anal Environ Epidemiol1999; 9: 502–512.
2.
KlepeisNENelsonWCOttWRRobinsonJPTsangAMSwitzerPBeharJVHernSC. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J Exposure Anal Environ Epidemiol2001; 11: 231–252.
3.
KousaAOglesbyLKoistinenKKünzliNJantunenM. Exposure chain of urban air PM2.5 – association between ambient fixed site, residential outdoor, indoor, workplace and personal in four European cities in the EXPOLIS – study. Atmos Environ2002; 36: 3031–3039.
4.
BranišMKolomazníkováJ. Year-long continuous personal exposure to PM2.5 recorded by a fast responding portable nephelometer. Atmos Environ2010; 4: 2865–2872.
5.
KoutrakisPBrauerMBriggsSLKLeadererBP. Indoor exposures to fine aerosols and acid gases. Environ Health Perspect1991; 95: 23–28.
6.
Howard-ReedCReaAWZufallMJBurkeJMWilliamsRWSuggsJCSheldonLSWalshDKwokR. Use of a continuous nephelometer to measure personal exposure to particles during the US Environmental Protection Agency Baltimore and Fresno panel studies. J Air Waste Manage Assoc2000; 50: 1125–1132.
7.
LaiHKKendallMFerrierHLindupIAlmSHänninenOJantunenMMathysPColvileRAshmoreMRCullinanPNieuwenhuijsenMJ. Personal exposures and microenvironment concentrations of PM2.5, VOC, NO2 and CO in Oxford UK. Atmos Environ2004; 38: 6399–6410.
8.
ChaoCYHTungTCWBurnettJ. Influence of different indoor activities on the indoor particulate levels in residential buildings. Indoor Built Environ1998; 7: 110–121.
9.
ChaoCYChengEC. Source apportionment of indoor PM2.5 and PM10 in homes. Indoor Built Environ2002; 11: 27–37.
10.
AbtESuhHHAllenGKoutrakisP. Characterization of indoor particle sources: a study conducted in the metropolitan Boston Area. Environ Health Perspect2000; 108: 35–44.
11.
MorawskaLCongrongHEHitchinsJMengersenKGilbertD. Characteristics of particulate and mass concentrations in residential houses in Brisbane, Australia. Atmos Environ2003; 37: 4195–4203.
12.
RamachandranGAdgateJLPrattGCSextonK. Characterizing indoor and outdoor 15 minute average PM2.5 concentrations in urban neighbourhoods. Aerosol Sci Technol2003; 37: 33–45.
13.
WallaceLMitchellHO'ConnorGLiuLNeasLLippmannMKattanMKoenigJ. Particle concentrations in inner-city homes of children with asthma: the effect of smoking, cooking and outdoor pollution. Environ Health Perspect2003; 111: 1265–1272.
14.
FerroARKopperudRJHildemannLM. Elevated personal exposure to particulate matter from human activities in a residence. J Exposure Anal Environ Epidemiol2004; 14: S34–S40.
15.
HusseinTGlytsosTOndracekJDohanyosovaPZdimalVHameriKLazaridisMSmolikJKulmalaM. Particle size characterization and emission rates during indoor activities in a home. Atmos Environ2006; 40: 4285–4307.
16.
WallaceL. Indoor sources of ultrafine and accumulation mode particles: size distributions, size-resolved concentrations, and source strengths. Aerosol Sci Technol2006; 40: 348–360.
17.
GlytsosTOndracekJDzumbovaLKopanakisILazaridisM. Characterization of particulate matter concentrations during controlled activities. Atmos Environ2010; 44: 1539–1549.
18.
TianLWZhangGQZhangQMoschandreasDJHaoJHLinJPLiuYH. The impact of kitchen activities on indoor pollutant concentrations. Indoor Built Environ2008; 17: 377–383.
19.
YoonCRyuKKimJLeeKParkD. New approach for particulate exposure monitoring: determination of inhaled particulate mass by 24 h real-time personal exposure monitoring. J Exposure Sci Environ Epidemiol2012; 22: 344–351.
20.
MarpleVARubowKLTurnerWSpenglerJD. Low flow rate sharp cut impactors for indoor air sampling: design and calibration. J Air Poll Control Assoc1987; 37: 1303–1307.
21.
JenkinsRAIlgnerRHTomkinsBA. Development and application of protocols for the determination of response of real-time particle monitors to common indoor aerosols. J Air Waste Manage Assoc2004; 54: 229–241.
22.
ChangL-TSuhHHWolfsonJMMisraKAllenGACatalanoPJKoutrakisP. Laboratory and field evaluation of measurement methods for one-hour exposure to O3. PM2.5 and CO. J Air Waste Manage Assoc2001; 51: 1414–1422.
23.
WuYHaoJFuLWangZTangU. Vertical and horizontal profiles of airborne particulate matter near major roads in Macao, China. Atmos Environ2002; 36: 4907–4918.
24.
BranisM. The contribution of ambient sources to particulate pollution in spaces and trains of the Prague underground transport system. Atmos Environ2006; 40: 348–356.
25.
EPA. Exposure factors handbook, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460, USA, http://www.epa.gov/ncea/efh/pdfs/efh-complete.pdf (2011, accessed 4 June 2012).
26.
GehrigRBuchmannB. Characterising seasonal variations and spatial distribution of ambient PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations based on long-term Swiss monitoring data. Atmos Environ2003; 37: 2571–2580.
27.
GomiščekBHauckHStopperSPreiningO. Spatial and temporal variations of PM1, PM2.5, PM10 and particle number concentration during the AUPHEP – project. Atmos Environ2004; 38: 3917–3934.
28.
HeCMorawskaLHitchinsJGilbertD. Contribution from indoor sources to particle number and mass concentrations in residential houses. Atmos Environ2004; 38: 3405–3415.
29.
JonesNCThorntonCAHarrisonRM. Indoor/outdoor relationships of particulate matter in domestic homes with roadside, urban and rural locations. Atmos Environ1999; 34: 2603–2612.
30.
HusseinTHameriKHeikkinenMSAKulmalaM. Indoor and outdoor particle size characterization at a family house in Espoo – Finland. Atmos Environ2005; 39: 3697–3709.
31.
LongCMSuhHHKoutrakisP. Characterization of indoor particle sources using continuous mass and size monitors. J Air Waste Manage Assoc2000; 50: 1236–1250.
32.
WallaceLHoward ReedC. Continuous monitoring of ultrafine, fine and coarse particles in a residence for 18 months in 1999-2000. J Air Waste Manage Assoc2002; 52: 828–844.
33.
WallaceLAEmmerichSHoward ReedC. Source strengths of ultrafine and fine particles due to cooking with gas stove. Environ Sci Technol2004; 38: 2304–2311.
34.
BuonannoGMorawskaLStabileL. Particle emission factors during cooking. Atmos Environ2009; 43: 3235–3242.
35.
ToWMYeungLL. Effect of fuels on cooking fume emissions. Indoor Built Environ2011; 20: 555–563.
36.
KamensRLeeC-TWienerRLeithD. A study to characterize indoor particles in three non-smoking homes. Atmos Environ A1991; 25: 939–948.
37.
LaiACKChenFZ. Modeling of cooking-emitted particle dispersion and deposition in a residential flat: a real room application. Build Environ2007; 42: 3253–3260.
38.
EvansGJPeersASabaliauskasK. Particle dose estimation from frying in residential settings. Indoor Air2008; 18: 499–510.
39.
Acevedo-BoltonVChengK-CJiangR-TOttWRKlepeisNEHildemannLM. Measurement of the proximity effect for indoor air pollutant sources in two homes. J Environ Monitor2012; 14: 94–104.
40.
LevyJIWolfSKEvansJS. A regression based approach for estimating primary and secondary particulate matter intake fraction. Risk Anal2002; 22: 895–904.
41.
NazaroffW. Inhalation intake fraction of pollutants from episodic indoor emissions. Build Environ2008; 43: 269–277.
42.
HumbertSMarshallJDShakedSSpadarpJVNishiokaPPMcKoneTEHorvathAJolietP. Intake fraction for particulate matter: recommendations for life cycle impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol2011; 45: 4808–4816.
