Airborne fungal profiles in office buildings in metropolitan Adelaide,South Australia: Background levels,diversity and seasonal variation

Abstract

The presence of bioaerosols in indoor non-industrial workplace environments has become an increasing concern to indoor air quality assessors and Occupational Health and Safety professionals. The paucity of workplace survey information and national standards limits the comparisons that can be made when investigating suspected indoor fungal contamination. Data are needed on typical non-problem conditions, thereby providing background survey information. This study examined viable fungi in 128 air samples (89 indoor: 39 outdoor) from office buildings in Adelaide, South Australia, which has an arid Mediterranean climate. Results across four consecutive seasons show that the viable airborne fungal concentrations in indoor air were on average 75% lower than those in outdoor air. A seasonal influence was noted with higher fungal levels in autumn and summer compared with winter and spring. The most common culturable airborne fungi, across all seasons and conditions, were Penicillium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium and Alternaria. A weak correlation between fungal spore concentration in indoor air and carbon dioxide was observed (r = 0.26). No other correlations with indoor air quality parameters were noted. This study provides a profile of airborne fungal diversity and abundance in non-problem indoor environments and practical guidance to indoor air quality assessors on the interpretation of indoor fungal monitoring data.

Keywords

Airborne fungi Indoor air quality (IAQ)Non-problem buildings Seasonal variation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Singh

CWF

Kim

. Building pathology, investigation sick buildings—toxic moulds. Indoor Built Environ 2010; 19: 40–47.

Airaksinen

Kurnitski

Pasanen

Seppänen

. Fungal spore transport through a building structure. Indoor Air 2004; 14: 92–104.

Rowan

Johnstone

Mclean

Anderson

Clarke

. Prediction of toxigenic fungal growth in buildings by using a novel modelling system. Appl Environ Microb 1999; 65: 4814–4821.

Singh

. Building mycology: management of decay and health in buildings, London: E. & F.N. Spon Ltd, 1994.

Mendell

Fisk

Kreiss

Levin

Alexander

Cain

. Improving the health of workers in indoor environments: priority research needs for a national occupational research agenda. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 1430–1440.

Bird

Balshaw

Anderson

. Getting the best answer by asking the right question—case studies in occupational exposure to mould. J Health Safety Res Pract 2012; 4: 19–27.

Kemp

Neumeister-Kemp

Murray

Lysek

. Airborne fungi in non-problem buildings in a Southern-Hemisphere Mediterranean climate: preliminary study of natural and mechanical ventilation. Indoor Built Environ 2002; 11: 44–53.

Garrett

Hooper

Cole

Hooper

. Airborne fungal spores in 80 homes in the Latrobe Valley, Australia: levels, seasonality and indoor-outdoor relationship. Aerobiologia 1997; 13: 121–126.

Hargreaves

Parappukkaran

Morawska

Hitchins

Gilbert

. A pilot investigation into associations between indoor airborne fungal and non-biological particle concentrations in residential houses in Brisbane, Australia. Sci Total Environ 2003; 312: 89–101.

10.

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). Indoor air project part 1: main report indoor air in typical australian dwellings. Canberra: Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2010.

11.

World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: dampness and mould. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2009.

12.

Wilson

Adams

Tucker

Appleton

Taylor

Ruffin

. Trends in asthma prevalence and population changes in South Australia, 1990-2003. Med J Aust 2006; 184: 226–229.

13.

Shelton

Kirkland

Flanders

Morris

. Profiles of airborne fungi in buildings and outdoor environments in the United States. Appl Environ Microb 2002; 68: 1743–1753.

14.

Wong

Chan

Mui

Hui

. An assessment of airborne fungi exposure risk level in air-conditioned offices. Indoor Built Environ 2009; 18: 553–561.

15.

NIOSH, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. Method 0800: bioaerosol sampling (indoor air). NIOSH manual of analytical methods (NMAM). 4th ed. 1998. Ohio, USA: NIOSH Publication.

16.

Kemp P and Neumeister-Kemp H (eds) Australian mould guideline AMG-2005-01. 1st ed. Australia: Mycologia, 2005.

17.

Kemp P and Neumeister-Kemp H. The mould worker’s handbook: a practical guide for remediation. Australia: Messenger Publishing, 2010.

18.

Brown

. Indoor air quality in Australian buildings. Chem Aust 2004; 71: 6–6.

19.

Environment Australia: air toxics and indoor air quality in Australia. Canberra: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, 2001.

20.

Hargreaves M and Parappukkaran S. Fungal analysis of indoor air. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing, 2000.

21.

Brickus

LSR

Siqueira

LFG

De Aquino Neto

Cardoso

. Occurrence of airborne bacteria and fungi in Bayside Offices in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Indoor Built Environ 1998; 7: 270–275.

22.

Asan

Ilhan

Sen

Erkara

Filik

Cabuk

. Airborne fungi and actinomycetes concentrations in the air of Eskisehir City (Turkey). Indoor Built Environ 2004; 13: 63–74.

23.

Clean Air Society of Australia and New Zealand, CASANZ. Indoor air quality in Australia: a strategy for action. FASTS Occasional Pap Ser 2002; 5: 33–36.

24.

Schleibinger H and Yang W (eds). Indoor air quality and mould. Annual general meeting, conference and trade show march of the institute for research in construction, and the labrador environmental industry association. Indoor Environment Research Program, 2007.