The current review creates, for the first time, a comprehensive dataset of ventilation rates measured in European office buildings. This dataset can provide input to modelling studies. A review of the current status of ventilation standards and regulations for office buildings is also presented, as a reference. The review shows that the availability of measurements of ventilation rates in European offices is limited. Measurements have been carried out mainly in the Nordic and Western European countries and recently in Southern Europe. The limited data on a country level present variability and hence cannot be considered as representative, given the small number of measurements. Furthermore, due to the various measurement techniques that are used, it is not always possible to compare the results from the measurements with the existing regulations. In the case that a comparison is allowed, the mechanically ventilated (MV) buildings are over-ventilated (mean: 18 L s−1 person−1, range: 4.5–55 L s−1 person−1), compared with the national regulations and the value of 10 L s−1 person−1, which several studies propose to decrease the prevalence of symptoms of sick building syndrome. However, when compared against the same metrics, naturally ventilated (NV) offices are under-ventilated (NV range: 0.1–1.8 ach; MV range: 0.5–5 ach).
WolkoffP. Indoor air pollutants in office environments: assessment of comfort, health and performance. Int J Hyg Environ Health2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.08.001.
6.
YuCWFKimJT. Building pathology, investigation of sick buildings – VOC emissions. Indoor Built Environ2010; 19(1): 30–39.
7.
ChaoHJSchwartzJMiltonDK. The work environment and workers – health in four large office buildings. Environ Health Perspect2003; 111: 1242–1248.
8.
ErdmannCAApteMG. Mucous membrane and lower respiratory building related symptoms in relation to indoor carbon dioxide concentrations in the 100-building BASE dataset. Indoor Air2004; 14(Suppl. 8): 127–134.
9.
ApteMGFiskWJDaiseyJM. Associations between indoor CO2 concentrations and sick building syndrome symptoms in US office buildings: an analysis of the 1994–1996 BASE study data. Indoor Air2000; 10: 246–257.
10.
MyattTAJohnstonSLZuoZ. Detection of airborne rhinovirus and its relation to outdoor air supply in office environments. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2004; 169: 1187–1190.
11.
JaakkolaJJKTuomaalaPSeppanenO. Air recirculation and sick building syndrome: a blinded crossovertrial. Am J Public Health1994; 84: 422–428.
12.
JaakkolaJJKMiettinenP. Ventilation rate in office buildings and sick building syndrome. Occup Environ Med1995; 52: 709–714.
13.
StenbergBErikssonNHöögJ. The sick building syndrome (SBS) in office workers. A case referent study of personal, psychosocial and building-related risk indicators. Int J Epidemiol1994; 23: 1190–1197.
14.
SundellJLindvallTStenbergB. Associations between type of ventilation and air flow rates in office buildings and the risk of SBS-symptoms among occupants. Environ Int1994; 20: 239–251.
15.
MenziesDFanningAYuanL. Hospital ventilation and risk for tuberculous infection in Canadian health care workers. Ann Intern Med1993; 133: 779–789.
16.
MiltonDKGlencrossPMWaltersMD. Risk of sick leave associated with outdoor air supply rate, humidification and occupant complaints. Indoor Air2000; 10: 212–221.
17.
MendellMJFiskWJ. Is health in office buildings related only to psychosocial factors?Occup Environ Med2007; 64: 69–70.
18.
FinneganJJPickeringCACBurgePS. The sick building syndrome: prevalence studies. Br Med J1984; 289: 1573–1575.
19.
HedgeABurgePSRobertsonAS. Work-related illness in offices: a proposed model of the Sick Building Syndrome. Environ Int1989; 15: 143–158.
20.
Harrison J, Pickering CAC, Finnegan MJ, et al.: The sick building syndrome: further prevalence studies and investigations of possible causes: in Proceedings of Indoor Air ‘87, Institute for Water, Soil and Air Hygiene, Berlin, Germany, 1987, 1, pp. 487–491.
21.
BurgeSHedgeAWilsonE. Sick building syndrome: a study of 4,373 office workers. Ann Occup Hyg1987; 31: 493–504.
22.
SkovPValbjørnO. The sick building syndrome in the office environment: The Danish Town Hall study. Environ Int1987; 13: 339–349.
23.
ZweersTSkovPValbjornO. The effect of ventilation and air pollution on perceived indoor air quality in five town halls. Energy Build1990; 14: 175–181.
24.
MendellMJSmithAH. Consistent patterns of elevated symptoms in air-conditioned office buildings: a reanalysis of epidemiologic studies. Am J Public Health1990; 80: 1193–1199.
25.
WargockiPSundellJBischofW. Ventilation and health in nonindustrial indoor environments: report from a European Multidisciplinary Scientific Consensus Meeting (EUROVEN). Indoor Air2002; 12: 113–128.
26.
JaakkolaJJKHeinonenOPSeppanenO. Mechanical ventilation in office buildings and the Sick Builidng Syndrome. An experimental and epidemiological study. Indoor Air1991; 2: 111–121.
27.
BluyssenPMde Oliveira FernandesEGroesL. European indoor air quality audit project in 56 office buildings. Indoor Air1996; 6: 221–238.
28.
Bischof W, Braschel S, Btinger M, et al.: ProKlimA – history, aim and study design: in Proceedings of Indoor Air ‘99, the 8th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Edinburgh, UK, 1999, 5, pp. 376–381.
29.
Pejtersen J, Schwab R, Mayer E: Sensory evaluation of the air in 14 office buildings – part of an interdisciplinary SBS study in Germany: in Proceedings of Indoor Air ‘99, the 8th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Edinburgh, UK, 1999, 5, pp. 390–395.
30.
GodishTSpenglerJD. Relationships between ventilation and indoor air quality. a review: Indoor Air1996; 6: 135–145.
31.
SeppänenOAFiskWJMendellMJ. Association of ventilation rates and CO2 concentrations with health and other responses in commercial and institutional buildings. Indoor Air1999; 9: 226–252.
32.
SundellJLevinHNazaroffWW. Ventilation rates and health: multidisciplinary review of the scientific literature. Indoor Air2011; 2: 191–204.
33.
Wargocki P: The effects of ventilation in homes on health: in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Industrial Ventilation, Paris, 17–19 September 2012.
34.
YuCWFKimJT. Low carbon housings and indoor air quality. Indoor Built Environ2012; 21(1): 5–15.
35.
SeppänenOAFiskWJ. Summary of human responses to ventilation. Indoor Air2004; 14(Suppl. 7): 102–118.
36.
FiskWJMirerAGMendellMJ. Quantitative relationship of sick building syndrome symptoms with ventilation rates. Indoor Air2009; 19(2): 159–165.
37.
DimitroulopoulouC. Ventilation in European dwellings. a review: Build Environ2012; 47: 109–125.
38.
Asikainen A, Hänninen O, Brelih N, et al. Proportion of residences in European countries with ventilation rates below the regulation based limit value: in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Industrial Ventilation, Paris, 17–19 September 2012.
39.
EN 13779: 2007: European Standard: Ventilation for non-residential buildings – performance requirements for ventilation and room-conditioning systems, CEN Brussels, April 2007.
40.
EN 15251: 2007: European Standard: Indoor environment input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings, CEN Brussels, May 2007.
41.
ASHRAE 62.1-2010: Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality, Atlanta, GA, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2010.
42.
Olesen BW: Standards for ventilation and indoor air quality in relation to the EPBD: REHVA J 2011; 28–32.
43.
AIVC: Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre, http://www.aivc.org/, (accessed October 2012).
44.
Brelih N, Seppänen O: Ventilation rates and IAQ in European Standards and National Regulations: in AIVC Conference, Brussels, Belgium, 12–13 October 2011.
45.
Wouters P, Heijmans N, Delmotte C, et al.: Trends in the Belgian Building Ventilation Market and Drivers for Change: Ventilation Information Paper No. 18. Coventry, Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre, 2008.
46.
Charvat P. Ventilation in the Czech Republic: Technical Note AIVC 63. Coventry, Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre, 2008.
47.
Charvat P. Trends in the Czech Building Ventilation Market and Drivers for Change: Ventilation Information Paper No. 27. Coventry, Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre, 2008.
Durier F. Trends in the French Building Ventilation: Market and Drivers for Changes: Ventilation Information Paper No. 19. Coventry, Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre, 2008.
51.
Limb MJ: A Review of International Ventilation, Airtightness, Thermal Insulation and Indoor Air Quality Criteria: AIC-TN55. Oscar Faber Group, on behalf of the AIVC, 2001.
Eriksson M: Trends in the Norwegian Building Ventilation Market and Drivers for Change: Ventilation Information Paper No. 21. Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre, 2008.
55.
Ahlander G: Private Communication. Sweden, Swedish Environment Authority, 2012.
56.
ADF. Ventilation – The Building Regulations 2000, F Approved Document, 2010 edn. London: NBS for the Department for Communities and Local Government, HM Government. ISBN: 978 1 85946 370 3.
57.
de Gids WF, Wouters P: CO2 as Indicator for the Indoor Air Quality: General Principles: Ventilation Information Paper No. 33. Coventry, Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre, 2010.
58.
ZuraimiMSRouletC-AThamKW. A comparative study of VOCs in Singapore and European office buildings. Build Environ2006; 41: 316–329.
59.
WargockiPFangerPOKrupiczP. Sensory pollution loads in six office buildings and a department store. Energy Build2004; 36(10): 995–1001.
60.
HummelgaardJJuhlPSæbjörnssonKO. Indoor air quality and occupant satisfaction in five mechanically and four naturally ventilated open-plan office buildings. Build Environ2007; 42: 4051–4058.
61.
TeijonsaloJJaakkolaJJKSeppåunenO. The Helsinki Office Environment Study: air change in mechanically ventilated buildings. Indoor Air1996; 6(2): 111–117.
62.
KorhonenPKokottiHKalliokoskiP. Survey and mitigation of occupational exposure of radon in workplaces. Build Environ2000; 35: 555–562.
63.
VincentDAnnesiIFestyB. Ventilation system, indoor air quality, and health outcomes in Parisian modern office workers. Environ Res1997; 75: 100–112.
64.
Ribot B, Ginestet A, Henninot M, et al: Indoor air quality in 2 different office buildings-Part 1: ventilation, temperature and humidity of air and gas concentrations: in Proceedings of Healthy Buildings 2003 Conference, Singapore.
65.
BlondeauPSperandioMAllardF. Multicriteria analysis of ventilation in summer period. Build Environ2002; 37: 165–176.
66.
KuchenEFischMNLeaoM. Indoor air quality defined by measurements and questionnaires in office buildings. Bauphysik2009; 31(5): 313–318.
67.
MissiaDADimitriouEMichaelN. Indoor exposure from building materials: a field study. Atmospheric Environ2010; 44(35): 4388–4395.
OrosaJABaaliñaA. Passive climate control in Spanish office buildings for long periods of time. Build Environ2008; 43: 2005–2012.
70.
Ni RiainCKolokotroniMDaviesM. Cooling effectiveness of south façade passive stacks in a naturally ventilated office building: case study. Indoor Built Environ1999; 8(5): 309–321.
71.
Kukadia V, Palmer J: The effect of external atmospheric pollution on indoor air quality: in Proceedings of Optimum ventilation and air flow control in buildings, 17th AIVC Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 17–20 September 1996, pp. 41–49.
72.
Kukadia V, Pike J, White M: Air pollution and natural ventilation in an urban building: a case study: in Proceedings of the CIBSE National Conference, London, UK, 5–7 October 1997.
73.
MarkD. A Comparison of Outdoor and Indoor Levels of Airborne Particles at Two Sites on Marylebone Road, London. UK: UK Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DETR). Report EPG 1/3/95, 1999.
74.
AizlewoodCDimitroulopoulouC. HOPE project: the UK experience. Indoor Built Environ2006; 15(5): 393–409.
75.
DascalakiESantamourisM. On the potential of retrofitting scenarios for offices. Build Environ2002; 37(6): 557–567.
76.
GratiaEDe HerdeA. Is day natural ventilation still possible in office buildings with a double-skin facade?Build Environ2004; 39: 399–409.
77.
GratiaEBruyereIDe HerdeA. How to use natural ventilation to cool narrow office buildings. Build Environ2004; 39: 1157–1170.
78.
BreeschHBossaerAJanssensA. Passive cooling in a low-energy office building. Solar Energy2005; 79: 682–696.
79.
GratiaEDe HerdeA. Guidelines for improving natural daytime ventilation in an office building with a double-skin facade. Solar Energy2007; 81: 435–448.
80.
Kurnitski J, Seppänen O: Trends and Drivers in the Finnish Ventilation and AC Market: Ventilation Information Paper No. 20. Coventry, Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre, 2008.
81.
AIR.H.: Installation de ventilation dans l'existant: enjeux et propositions d'amélioration à travers les diagnostics – Report for ADEME, February 2007.
82.
Mouilleseaux A, Squinazi F, Festi B: Air quality in air-conditioned office buildings: in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate “Indoor Air’93”, Helsinki, Finland, 1993, 6, pp. 615–620.
83.
Mouilleseaux A, Squinazi F, Festi B, et al: Etude de la qualité d’air dans deux immeubles climatisé et non climatisé: in Proceedings of the 8th World Clean Air Congress, Hague, the Netherlands, 1989, 1, pp. 223–228.
84.
Saude I, Lowestein JC, Millancourt B, et al: Indoor air quality: comparing an air-conditioned building and a naturally ventilated building: in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Helsinki, Finland, 1993, 2, pp. 87–92.
85.
Ginestet A, Ribot B, Henninot M, et al: Indoor air quality in 2 different office buildings–Part 2: indoor and outdoor airborne particulate levels and air filtration: in Proceedings of the 7th Healthy Buildings Conference 2003, Singapore.
86.
Mandin C, Ramalho O, Ribéron J, et al.: IAQ, ventilation, comfort and health in office buildings: a French nationwide survey: in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Industrial Ventilation, Paris, 17–19 September 2012.
87.
Lucas JP, Ramalho O, Kirchner S, et al.: Etat de la ventilation dans le Parc de logements Français. CSTB, DESE/SB – 2009-037, 2009.
88.
EngdahlF. Evaluation of Swedish ventilation systems. Build Environ1998; 33(4): 197–200.
89.
MohleGCrumpDBrownV. Development and application of a protocol for the assessment of indoor air quality. Indoor Built Environ2003; 12(3): 139–149.
