Subjective and Objective Evaluation of the Thermal Environment in a Three-Star Green Office Building in China

Abstract

A post-occupancy study was carried out to investigate the thermal environment in a high-standard office building certified by China Three-star Green Building Label. The study included a subjective evaluation of the indoor environment quality and work performance. A total of 182 office workers responded to the questionnaire survey based on the Building Use Studies (BUS) Occupant Survey and Reporting Method. Objective measurements of the thermal environment (temperature and relative humidity) under mechanically and naturally ventilated conditions were also carried out in the building. Although the thermal environment satisfied the majority of respondents, 12% and 20% reported dissatisfaction with summer and winter temperatures, respectively. The complaint on summer temperature was mainly from those working close to the chilled air outlets of the air-conditioners. The perception of cold winter temperatures revealed the potential shortcomings of sustainable building design in humid subtropical climates, where natural ventilation and passive cooling would predominate in the sustainable design while cold air in winter would tend to be neglected. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reasons why green buildings succeeded or failed to meet occupants’ perception and this could have an implication in the design decisions for green building practice.

Keywords

Green building Thermal environment Post-occupancy study Air-conditioning Natural ventilation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

CWF

Kim

: Building environmental assessment schemes for rating of IAQ in sustainable buildings: Indoor Built Environ 2011;20(1):5–15.

USGBC: Green Building and LEED Core Concepts, 2009.

USGBC: LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations, 2009.

Lee

Guerin

: Indoor environmental quality related to occupant satisfaction and performance in LEED-certified buildings: Indoor Built Environ 2009;18(4):293–300.

Clements-Croome

: Impact of indoor environment on productivity: in Workplace Comfort Forum, Royal Institute of British Architects, London, 1995.

Institute for Building Environment and Energy Conservation: Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency for New Construction, Tokyo, Japan, 2008.

Green Building Council Australia: Technical Manual: Green Star Office Design & Office as Built, 2008.

Building Research Establishment: Building Research Establishment's Environmental Assessment Method, Watford, UK, 2008.

50189-2005

: Design standard of energy efficiency of public buildings with explanation. China Architecture and Building Press: The People's Republic of China National Standard, Beijing, 2005.

10.

Huizenga

Abbaszadeh

Zagreus

Arens

: Air quality and thermal comfort in office buildings: Results of a large indoor environmental quality survey: in Fernandes

de Silva

Pinto

(eds): Proceedings of HB 2006: Healthy Buildings, Lisbon 4-8 June 2006, Vol. 3, pp. 393–397.

11.

Abbazadeh

Zagreus

Lehrer

Huizenga

: Occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality in green buildings: in Fernandes

de Silva

Pinto

(eds): Proceedings of HB 2006; Healthy Buildings, Lisbon 4–8 June 2006, Vol. 3, pp. 365–370.

12.

Leaman

Bordass

: Are users more tolerant of “green” buildings?: Building Res Informat 2007;35(6):662–673.

13.

Leaman

Bordass

: Productivity in buildings: the 'killer' variables: in Clements-Croome (ed.): Creating the Productive Workplace, London and New York, Taylor & Francis Group, 2006, pp. 182–209.

14.

Paevere

Brown

: Indoor environment quality and occupant productivity in the CH2 building: Post-occupancy summary: Australian Commonweath Scientific and Research Organization, Melbourne, 2008.

15.

Paul

Taylor

: A comparison of occupant comfort and satisfaction between a green building and a conventional building: Building Environ 2008;43(11):1858–1870.

16.

Hong Kong Observatory: Monthly Meteorological Normals for Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 2009.

17.

Bordass

Leaman

: Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 1: A portifolio of feedback techniques: Building Res Informat 2005;33(4):347–352.

18.

Bordass

Leaman

: Making feedback and post-occupancy evaluation routine 3: case studies of the use of techniques in the feedback portifolio: Building Res Informat 2005;33(4):361–375.

19.

Bordass

Leaman

Paul

: Assessing building performance in use 5: conclusions and implications: Building Res Informat 2001;29(2):144–157.

20.

Brager

Paliaga

de Dear

: Operable windows, personal control and occupant comfort: ASHRAE Transact 2004;110(2):17–35.

21.

Frontczak

Wargocki

: Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments: Building Environ 2011;46(4):922–937.