Indoor Environmental Quality Related to Occupant Satisfaction and Performance in LEED-certified Buildings

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify whether the indoor environmental quality design criteria: office layout, office furnishing, thermal comfort, indoor air quality, lighting, acoustics, and cleanliness and maintenance in relation to the overall workspace for LEED^®-acreditation, could significantly affect occupants’ perception of their overall workspace satisfaction and their work performances. Occupants’ self-assessed satisfaction and performances were measured and these were correlated with occupants’ satisfaction and performances in their overall workspaces in 15 LEED-certified buildings in the US. The findings showed office furnishing quality has a significant impact on occupants’ satisfaction and performances; and indoor air quality affected only the occupants’ performances

Keywords

Indoor environmental quality LEED-certified buildings Occupant satisfaction and performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

USGBC: About USGBC. U.S. Green Building Council, 2008. Available at: www.usgbc.org

USGBC: Green building by the numbers. U.S. Green Building Council, 2006. Available at: www.usgbc.org

Building Design & Construction: White Paper on Sustainability: A Report to the Green Building Movement, Building Design & Construction, Washington DC, USA, 2003.

CGOEM: Using LEED-NC in Colorado: Tips, Resources and Examples, Colorado Governor’s Office of Energy Management & Conservation, Colorado, USA, 2006.

Usgbc : An Introduction to the U.S. Green Building Council and the LEED Green Building Rating System®, U.S. Green Building Council, 2005. Available at: www.usgbc.org

Building Design & Construction : Green Buildings Research White Paper: Fifth in a Series of Annual Reports on the Green Building Movement, Building Design & Construction , Washington DC, USA, 2007.

U.S. Green Building Council Research Committee ( 2007): A National Green Building Research Agenda, US Green Building Council, Washington D.C., 2008.

Wbdg : Enhance indoor environmental quality: Whole Building Design Guide, 2006. Available at: www.wbdg.org

Schendler A. , Udall R. : LEED is Broken; Let’s Fix It, Grist: Environmental News & Commentary, Published in October 26, 2005.

10.

Scheuer CW , Keoleian GA : Evaluation of LEED using life cycle assessment methods: Report prepared for the National Institute of Standards and Technology , Gaithersburg, MD, 2002.

11.

Giese JL , Cote JA : Defining consumer satisfaction Academy of Marketing Science Review 2000;1:1-24.

12.

Huizenga C. , Zagreus L. , Arens E. , Lehrer D. : Measuring indoor environmental quality: A web-based occupant satisfaction survey: in Proc. Green Build 2003 Pennsylvania , 2003 .

13.

McIver JP , Carmines EG : Unidimensional Scaling, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 1981.

14.

Kaid LL : Measuring Candidate Images with Semantic Differentials in Hacker’s Presidential Candidate Images, Lanhma, MD, Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.

15.

Sundell J. : On the history of indoor air quality and health: Indoor Air 2004;14:51-58.

16.

Wargocki P. , Wyon DP , Baik YK , Clausen G. , Franger PO : Perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) and productivity in an office with two different pollution loads: Indoor Air 1999 ;9:165-179.

17.

Wargocki P. , Lagercrantz L. , Witterseh T. , Sundell J. , Wyon DP , Fanger PO : Subjective perceptions, symptoms intensity and performance: A comparison of two independent studies, both changing similarly the pollution load in an office: Indoor Air 2002;12:74-80.