Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper reports on the development of a thermal comfort toolkit designed for the normative assessment of the indoor thermal environment of office facilities. It is one component of a larger building performance toolkit developed for the US General Services Administration. The thermal comfort part includes a set of unambiguously defined performance indicators (PI) based on the notion of objectively quantifiable performance measures. The set of indicators is founded on existing knowledge in biophysics and physiology, and constitutes a normative tool to assess the performance of buildings. The calculation of PIs is fully operational and web based. In the paper, the theoretical derivation of the indicators is given and their relevance in design scenarios is discussed.

Keywords

Thermal comfort Normative assessment Performance indicator Design scenarios Office buildings

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fanger PO : Thermal comfort. Danish Technical Press, Copenhagen, 1970.

Ashrae : ASHRAE Fundamentals. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2005.

Ifma : Press release - IFMA survey ranks top 10 office complaints ... and some that score high on the laugh meter. International Facility Management Association (www.ifma.org), 2003.

Pati D. , Park CS , Augenbroe G. : Roles of building performance assessment in stakeholder dialogue in AEC: Automation in Construction 2006;15:415-427.

Astm : ASTM Standards on whole building functionality and serviceability. American Society for Testing and Materials , West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2000 .

Usgbc : LEED rating system (version 2.0), US Green Building Council, 2001.

Augenbroe G. , Park CS : Quantification methods of technical building performance: Building Res Inform 2005;33:159-172.

Shohet IM , Park CS , Augenbroe G. : Key performance indicators for public office facilities maintenance: In: Proc. of CIB W70, Trondheim, Norway, 2006.

Ashrae : ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2004 Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2004.

10.

Heiselberg P. : Draught risk from cold vertical surfaces : Building Environ 1994;29:297-301.

11.

Fanger PO , Christensen NK : Perception of draught in ventilated spaces: Ergonomics 1986; 29:215-235.

12.

Friedman G. : Too hot too cold: Diagnosing occupant complaint : ASHRAE Journal 2004; 46:157-163.

13.

Augenbroe G. , Park CS : Building performance toolkit for GSA (Phase III: medium scale benchmarking . Interim progress report submitted to US federal GSA, 2004.

14.

Augenbroe G. , Park CS , Makarechi S. : Georgia Tech energy initiative, interim progress report submitted to Institute of Sustainable Technology and Development, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2004.

15.

Jones BW , Hsieh K. , Hashinaga M. : The effect of air velocity on thermal comfort at moderate activity levels : ASHRAE Trans 1986;92: 761-769.

16.

Astm : Standard test methods for glazing for detention facilities (ASTM F1915-05), 2005.

Normative Thermal Comfort Assessment

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References