Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey: normative data from the general Norwegian population

Abstract

Anchoring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in population norms makes clinical interpretations more meaningful and is in accordance with practice in other fields of medicine. In this paper norms for the Short Form 36 (SF-36) are presented in a random sample, representative of the general Norwegian population. In addition, sociodemographic variables affecting the scale scores are explored and discussed. The response rate was 67%, being lowest among subjects aged 70 years or over. Data-completeness strongly declined with increasing age. Physical health scales were also strongly affected by age. In all scales, with the exception of general health perceptions, women reported having poorer health than men. Marital status affected the four mental health scales. Educational status affected all the scales, but the effect was smallest in the mental scales. These norms can be employed for comparison in case-control studies, or to interpret HRQOL changes in prospective studies. Differences in social status should be given special attention. Caution should be exercised when assessing subjective health or employing the norms among subjects aged 70 years or over.

Keywords

data quality empirical validity health-related quality of life reference data SF-36 survey.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Jenkinson C. Evaluating the efficacy of medical treatment: possibilities and limitations. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1395-403.

Bowling A. , Brazier J. ``Quality of life'' in social science and medicine. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1337-8.

Bell MJ , Bombardier C. , Tugwell P. Measurement of functional status, quality of life, and utility in rheumatoid arthritis . Arthritis Rheum 1990 ; 33: 591-601.

Ware JE , Keller SD Interpreting general health measures . In: Spilker B , editor. Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia : Lippincott-Raven ; 1996: p.445-60.

Jenkinson C. , Coulter A. , Wright L. Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. Br Med J 1993; 306: 1437 - 44.

Ware JE SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston : The Health Institute New England Medical Center; 1993.

Ebrahim S. Clinical and public health perspectives and applications of health-related quality of life measurement. Soc Sci Med 1995 ; 41: 1383-94.

Ware JE The SF-36 health survey. In: Spilker B , editor. Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven ; 1996: p. 337-46.

Ware JE , Sherbourne CD The MOS 36-item shortform health survey (SF-36) I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473 - 83.

10.

Aaronsen NK , Acquadro C. , Alonso J. , et al. International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project . Qual Life Res 1992 ; 1: 349 - 51.

11.

Loge JH , Kaasa S. , Hjermstad MJ , Kvien T. Translation and performance of the Norwegian SF-36 health survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. I. Data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity. J Clin Epidemiol 1998 (in press).

12.

Kvien TK , Kaasa S. , Smedstad LM The performance of the Norwegian SF-36 health survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis . J Clin Epidemiol 1998 (in press).

13.

Brazier JE , Harper R. , Jones NMB , et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care . Br Med J 1992; 305: 160-4.

14.

How to score the SF-36 health survey. Boston: Medical Outcomes Trust; 1994.

15.

Hjermstad MJ Fayers PM , Bjordal K. , Kaasa S. Healthrelated quality of life in the general population assessed by the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire- The EORTC QLQ-C30 (+3). J Clin Oncol 1998 ; 16: 1188-96.

16.

Sullivan M. Karlsson J. , Ware JE The Swedish SF-36 health survey. I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1349 - 58.

17.

Moum T.

Is subjective well-being a predictor of nonresponse in broad population surveys?

Soc Ind Res 1994; 32: 1-20.

18.

Ware JE , Keller SD , Gandek B. , Brazier JE. Sullivan M. , The IQOLA project group. Evaluating translations of health status questionnaires. Methods from the IQOLA project. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1995; 11: 525 - 51.

19.

McHorney CA Ware JE , Lu JFR , Sherbourne CD The MOS 36-item health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994 ; 32: 40-66.

20.

Cooper B. Epidemiology of dementia and cognitive decline in the elderly. In: Jablensky A , editor. Epidemiological psychiatry . London: Bailliere Tindall ; 1995: p. 175-200.

21.

Kaasa S. , Hjermstad MJ , Jordhøy MS , WisløffF , Loge JH Compliance in quality of life data - a Norwegian experience. Statistics in Medicine 1998; 17: 623 - 32.

22.

Stewart AL , Sherbourne CD , Brod M. Measuring health-related quality of life in older and demented populations . In: Spilker B , editor. Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials . Philadelphia : Lippincott-Raven ; 1996: p. 819 - 30.

23.

McHorney CA Measuring and monitoring general health status in elderly persons: practical and methodological issues in using the SF-36 health survey. Gerontologist 1998 ; 36: 571-81.

24.

Stewart AL , Greenfield S. , Hays RD Functional status and wellbeing of patients with chronic conditions . JAMA 1989 ; 262: 907-14.

25.

Lydick EG , Epstein RS Clinical significance of quality of life data. In: Spilker B , editor. Quality of life and pharmaeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996: p. 461-5.

26.

McHorney CA Methodological and psychometric issues in health status assessment across populations and applications . Adv Med Sociol 1994 ; 5: 281 - 304.