Restricting the influx of disability beneficiaries by means of law: experiences in Norway

Abstract

Objectives: To study effects of restricting eligibility criteria for disability pension in Norway 1991.

Methods: Documents of 288 applicants from 1990 and 1993 in one county were analysed for social and medical variables as well as for the determination and its causes.

Results: Incidence of applications for disability benefits during a three-month period was 223 per 100,000 inhabitants in 1990. The focused group of `medically imprecise` musculoskeletal diagnoses concerned 26% of all applicants, while `precise` musculoskeletal diagnoses were given to 15%,`imprecise` psychiatric diagnoses to 7% and `precise` ones to 6%. The number of applicants fell by 39%, surprisingly about the same in all social and diagnostic groups. Denial rate increased from 8% to 21%. Denials mostly struck women, middle-aged, those living alone, those with short education, and applicants with `medically imprecise` diagnoses.

Conclusions: Restriction of disability benefits affected applicants with the least resources the hardest, and seems to contribute to the on-going process of marginalising the weaker part of the population.

Keywords

disability social security social insurance insurance medicine family medicine.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Oecd. New orientations for social policy. Social policy studies No. 12. Paris: OECD 1994.

Ploug N. , Kvist J. Recent trends in cash benefits in Europe. Copenhagen: Danish National Institute of Social Research 1994.

Esping-Andersen G (ed). Welfare states in transition. London: Sage Publications 1996.

Gustman AL , Mitchell OS , Steinmeier TL Retirement research using the health and retirement survey. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research 1994.

Kolberg JE (ed). Between work and social citizenship . New York: M.E. Sharpe 1992.

Nordisk sosialstatistisk komite. Sosial trygghet i de nordiske land (Social security in the Nordic countries). Oslo: Nordic Social-Statistical Committe 1992 (in Scandinavian).

Ot.prp. nr 62 (1990—91). Om midlertidig lov om kompensasjonstillegg til ytelser fra folketrygden og om lov om endringer i lov av 17.juni 1966 nr 12 om folketrygd (Proposition to the Parliament no 62 (1990—91). About provisional Act of compensation supplement to National Insurance Scheme benefits, and about Act amending the Act of 17 June 1966 no 12 of National Insurance). Oslo: Department of Social Affairs 1991 (in Norwegian).

Claussen B. , Due H. , Lunde S. , Moen B. Hvem søker uførepensjon, hvordan behandles søknadene og hvordan går det med dem som får avslag? (Who apply for disability benefits, how are the applications determined and what happens to those who are refused?) Oslo: Institute of General Practice, University of Oslo 1995 (in Norwegian).

Rikstrygdeverket. Trygdestatistisk årbok 1994 (Statistical annual of National Insurance 1994). Oslo: Rikstrygdeverket 1994 (in Norwegian).

10.

Halvorsen K. Arbeidsløshet og arbeidsmarginalisering (Unemployment and work marginalisation) . Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 1994.

11.

Claussen B. Rehabilitation efforts before and after tightening eligibility for disability benefits in Norway. Int J Rehabilitation Research (in press).

12.

Getz L. , Westin S. , Paulsen B. Doctors and the disability pension. General practitioners' response to narrower medical eligibility criteria. Tidsskr Nor Lœgeforen 1994; 114: 1435—40 (in Norwegian with English abstract).

13.

Okpaku SO , Sibulkin AE , Schenzler C. Disability determinations for adults with mental disorders: Social Security Administration vs independent judgements. Am J Public Health 1994; 84: 1791—5.

14.

Kangas O. , Palme J. Statism eroded? Labor-market benefits and challenges to the Scandinavian welfare states. In: Hansen EJ , Ringen S , Uusitalo H , Erikson R (eds). Welfare trends in the Scandinavian countries. New York: M.E. Sharpe 1993.