Nonresponse Bias Due to Consent Procedures in School-Based,Health-Related Research

Abstract

Written, parental consent was solicited from parents of 517 seventh grade students in four junior high schools in Bergen, Norway for their children's participation in a longitudinal nutrition education study. After having received several reminders, 97.3% of the parents gave their written consent. Students whose parents gave an immediate written consent reported more positive eating habits and were more likely to plan for college than were students whose parents responded after receiving one or more reminders. The observed differences did not severely bias our baseline estimates of these variables, and the magnitude of the observed intervention impact did not change as a result of excluding students whose parents were slow to respond. Excluding these students did, however, affect our ability to identify important factors associated with healthy eating behavior including socio-economic status. Subject selection bias may represent a threat to the validity of studies using a written parental consent procedure.

Keywords

informed consent school children non-response bias

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Norwegian Act No. 48 Relating to personal data registries. June 6, 1978.

2. Severson H , Biglan A . Rationale for the use of passive consent in smoking prevention research: Politics, policy, and pragmatics. Prev Med 1989; 18: 267–79.

3. Severson H , Ary DV . Sampling bias due to consent procedures with adolescents. Addict Behav 1983; 8: 433–7.

4. Kearney KA , Hopkins BH , Mauss AL , Weisheit RA . Sample bias resulting from a requirement for written parental consent. Public Opinion Quarterly 1983; 47: 96–102.

5. Pedersen W , Lavik NJ , Clausen SE . Adolescent drug use – a research strategy. (Nor) Alkoholpolitik 1988; 2: 120–6.

6. Klepp KI , Wilhelmsen BU . Nutrition education in junior high schools: Incorporating behavior change strategies into home economic courses. Health Educ Res 1993; 8: 537–54.

7. Klepp KI , Wilhelmsen BU , Andrews T . Promoting healthy eating patterns among Norwegian school-children. In: Nutbeam D , Haglund B , Farley P , Tillgren P , eds. Youth health promotion: from theory to practice in school and community. London: Forbes Publications Ltd., 1991; 137–56.

8. Cook TC , Campbell DT . Quasi-experimentation. Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1979.

9. Faden RR , Beauchamp TL . A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.

10.

10. Sobal J. Research ethics in nutrition education. J Nutr Educ 1992; 24: 234–8.