Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The relationship of therapeutic alliance to patient and treatment characteristics and to outcome, was studied in a sample of 106 patients consecutively admitted to a short-term psychiatric ward. The main finding was that a better therapeutic alliance at discharge was related to a greater improvement in symptoms during treatment. A multivariate model for prediction of outcome revealed a significant contribution from therapeutic alliance at discharge but not from alliance at admission or from changes in alliance during treatment. Improvement in alliance was seen in 41.5% of the patients, no change in 28.3% and a deterioration in 30.2%. Patients who improved their alliance did not differ from the others in background characteristics, but were more often subject to psychopharmocological treatment and were more often treated in a basic activation group. Patients with a stable poor alliance more often stated physically oriented target complaints at admission while patients with a stable satisfactory alliance more often presented interpersonally related complaints. It is concluded that further research in the field would benefit from a closer description of the change in the alliance and its relationship to treatment characteristics and outcome.

Keywords

Therapeutic alliance In-hospital psychiatric care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Luborsky L , Auerbach A . The therapeutic relationship in psychodynamic psychotherapy: The research evidence and its meaning for practice. In: Hales RE , Frances AJ , eds, Psychiatry Update: American Psychiatry Association Annual Review vol 4. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1985.

2. Docherty J . The therapeutic alliance and treatment outcome, In: Hales RE , Frances AJ , eds., Psychiatry Update: American Psychiatry Association Annual Review vol 4. Washington DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1985.

3. Luborsky L , Crits-Cristoph P , Alexander L , et al. Two helping alliance methods for predicting outcomes of psychotherapy. J Nerv Ment Dis 1983; 171: 480–91.

4. Marziali E , Marmor C , Krupnuick J . Therapeutic alliance scales: development and relationship to psychotherapy outcome. Am J Psychiatry 1981; 138: 361–4.

5. Allen JG , TarnoffG , Coyne L . Therapeutic alliance and long-term hospital outcome. Compr Psychiatry 1985; 26: 187–94.

6. Allen JG , Deering CD , James R , et al. Assessment of therapeutic alliances in the psychiatric hospital milieu. Psychiatry 9188; 51: 291–9.

7. Clarkin JF , Hurt SW , Crilly JL . Therapeutic alliance and hospital treatment outcome. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1987; 38: 871–5.

8. Hartley DE . Research on the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. In: Hales RE , Frances AJ , eds., Psychiatry Update: American Psychiatric Association Annual Review vol 4. Washington DC, American Psychiatric Press, 1985.

9. Hansson L , Berglund M , Öhman R. The use of treatment contracts in short-term psychiatric care. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1984; 70: 180–90.

10.

10. Hansson L , Berglund M , Öhman R , et al. Patient attitudes in short-term psychiatric care. Relations to social and psychiatric background, clinical symptoms and treatment model. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1985; 72: 93–201.

11.

11. Hansson L , Berglung M , Öhman R. Stability of treatment outcome in short-term psychiatric care. A six month follow-up of a controlled study of patient involvement. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1986; 74: 360–7.

12.

12. Hansson L , Berglund M , Öhman R. Individualized measures versus standardized rating scales in evaluation of inhospital psychiatric treatment. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1987; 75: 275–82.

13.

13. Hansson L , Berglund M , Factors influencing treatment outcome and patient satisfaction in a short-term psychiatric ward. A path analysis study of the importance of patient involvement in treatment planning. Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci 1987; 236: 269–75.

14.

14. Hansson L . Patient involvement in treatment planning. A controlled study of patients treated in short-term psychiatric care. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Psychiatry, University of Lund, Sweden, 1987.

15.

15. Åsberg M, Montgomery SA, Perris C, et al. A comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand, Suppl 271, 1978.

16.

16. Derogatis LR , et al. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory. Behav Sci 1974; 19: 1–15.

17.

17. Holsten F , Waal H . The drug taking evaluation scale. A simple scale for the evaluation of drug taking behaviour. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1980; 61: 275–305.

18.

18. Battle CC , Imber SD , Hoehn-Saric R , et al. Target complaints as criteria of improvement. Am J Psychother 1966; 20: 184–92.

19.

19. International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Deaths (Swedish Version, revision 8), Stockholm, Socialstyrelsen, 1968.

20.

20. Siegel S . Non-parametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.

21.

21. McNemar Q . Psychological statistics. New York: J Wiley, 1959.

22.

22. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS/PC+ V 3.0, SPSS Inc. 1988.

23.

23. Horwitz L . Clinical prediction in psychotherapy. New York: Jason Aronson, 1974.

24.

24. Dalgard OS , Berg-Larsen R , Ropstad O . Evaluering av et psykiatrisk behandlingsopplegg (Evaluation of a psychiatric treatment program, summary in English). Nordisk Psykiatrisk Tidskrift 1977; 38: 73–89.

Stability of therapeutic alliance and its relationship to outcome in short-term inpatient psychiatric care

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References