Is the development of Swedish psychiatry a success or not? Available information allows different answers to this question. Valid knowledge would demand psychiatric health service research on a much larger scale and with considerably higher ambitions than hitherto. Strong arguments can be raised about the need for such research to avoid that psychiatry will remain a medical wasteland in which confused policy makers will allocate less interest and money than ever.
1. Psychiatry in development. National Board of Health and Welfare PM 1988:21, Stockholm 1988 (in Swedish).
2.
2. Goals and organization of the psychiatric services. Report for groups of experts. National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm1973 (in Swedish).
3.
3. Guidelines for psychiatric care in the 1990's. National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm, 1980 (in Swedish).
4.
4. A new psychiatry in the county of Västmanland. Report from a symposium. National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm1988 (in Swedish).
5.
5. Kjellin L, Axelsson M, Candefjord I-L, Ekblom B, Eriksson K, Westrin C-G and Olle Östman. A gloomy picture of psychiatric in-patient care. Journal of Swedish Medical Association, 1988; 85, 4528–32 (in Swedish).
6.
6. The work environment – a serious problem for Swedish psychiatrists. The Journal of the Swedish Medical Association, 1988; 85, 1312–14 (in Swedish).
7.
7. Stein LI, Test MA. Alternative to mental hospital treatment. I. Conceptual model, treatment program, and clinical evalutation. Arch Gen Psychiatry1980; 37: 392–7.
8.
8. Weisbrod BA, Test MA, Stein LI. Alternative to mental hospital treatment. II. Economic benefit-cost analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry1980; 37: 400–5.
