Social Conditions of Children born after Artificial Insemination by Donor

Abstract

Few objective data are available concerning the social conditions of children born after artificial insemination by donor (AID). We have studied 341 consecutive AID children born of 261 women during a 13-year period. Data from hospital archives were compared with information from the National Register of Norway. The parameters studied included age-relations of parents and offspring, sex- and age-relations between siblings as well as the divorce rate in AID families. Median maternal age at birth of the first AID child was 30 years. Forty-three percent of AID children were born in families that already had children or that later obtained an additional child; the majority of these siblings were conceived by AID. Mean age difference between the closest related AID siblings was three years. Six of the 261 AID families were split by divorse during the study period. The results only reflect such information as can currently be obtained with maintainance of the promise of secrecy.

Keywords

Artificial insemination by donor (AID)children's social conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Rosenkvist H. Donor insemination. A prospective sociopsychiatric investigation of 48 couples. Dan Med Bull 1981; 28: 133–48.

2. Peterson EP. Artificial insemination by donor – a new look. Fertil Steril 1986; 46: 567–70.

3. Waltzer H. Psychological and legal aspects of artificial insemination (A.I.D.): An overview. Am J Psychother 1982; 36: 91–102.

4. Milsom I , Bergman P. A study of parental attitudes after donor insemination (AID). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 1982; 61: 125–28.

5. Personal Communication, Research Department, Demographic Unit, The Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway.

6. Clamar A. Artificial insemination by donor: The anonymous pregnancy. Am J Forensic Psychol 1984; 2: 27–37.

7. Clayton CE , Kovacs GT. AID offspring. Initial follow-up study of 50 couples. Med J Aust 1982; 1: 338–39.

8. Brunborg H.

Gutt eller jente?

Tidsskr Nor Légeforen 1987; 107: 1207–09.

9. Kremer J , Frijling BW , Nass JLM. Psychosocial aspects of parenthood by artificial insemination donor. Lancet 1984; 17: 628.

10.

10. Lebech PE. Problemer ved heterolog insemination. Ugeskr Léger 1974; 136: 837–38.

11.

11. Moe N , Skjéraasen J. Donorinseminasjon. En intervjuundersøkelse blant foreldre og sédgivere. Tidsskr Nor Légeforen 1985; 105: 1711–14.

12.

12. Showden R , Mitchell GD , Showden EM. Artificial reproduction: a social investigation. George Allen & Unwin, London, 1983.

13.

13. Tekavcic B.

Are there any psychological consequences in husband, wife and donor after AID?

Fertil Steril Proc Excerpta Medica Int Congress Series 1973; 278: 962–64.

14.

14. åbyholm T , Stray-Pedersen S. A follow-up study among 285 men with azoospermia and severe oligo-zoospermia. Int J Androl 1981; 4: 30.

15.

15. Behrman SJ. Artificial insemination. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1979; 22: 245–53.

16.

16. Bendvold E , Skjaeraasen J , Moe N , Sjøberg D , Kravdal ø. Marital break-up among couples raising families by artificial insemination by donor. Fertil Steril 1989; 6: 980–83.