The Penetrating Educational Effect of a Mass-Media Based Fund-Raising Campaign “Heart for Life”

Abstract

A one-Sunday fund-raising TV-show in 1987 was broadcasted by the state-owned TV-channel in Norway which is the only channel covering the whole country. The six-hour TV-show consisted of a considerable amount of information on risk of heart disease intermingled with entertainment and money-counting results. Mass media had covered the forthcoming TV-show extensively. The show is presently evaluated as a nationwide mass-media based health education campaign through a stratified random sample of 976 persons aged 15 years and above. More than 95% of the population were aware of the campaign and 75% followed the TV-show beyond the news reports. The sampled persons were asked for self-reported changes in health knowledge and behaviour. Fifty-seven per cent reported that they gained new knowledge and 25% reported behaviour changes in a positive direction. Women reported more knowledge gain than men. Low socioeconomic groups reported more gain in knowledge and more positive changes in health behaviour than high groups. A close association was found between reported new knowledge and change of health behaviour (p < 0.001). The results of the study indicate that this campaign has reached segments of the population that previously have been difficult to reach and that this is possibly due to the extensive advance coverage of the show in the mass media and the “entertaining” character of the show with emotional appeals in addition to factual information.

Keywords

Heart disease mass media health education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Flora JA , Maibach EW , Maccoby N. The role of media across four levels of health promotion intervention. Ann Rev Public Health 1989; 10: 181–201.

2. Vellar OD , Glattre E , Borchgrevink CF , Aasen AO , Jensen E , Smith A , Storstein JA , Walle S. Kosthold og helse. Virkninger av en kostholdsbrosjyre sendt befolkningen i fem legedistrikter. Oslo: Landsforeningen for kosthold og helse, 1977.

3. Karlsen E , Aarø LE , Borchgrevink CF. Publikums reaksjoner på postal helseinformasjon. Evaluering av et helseopplysningstiltak under Hjerte- og karprosjektet i Sogn og Fjordane. Tidsskr Nor Légeforen 1987; 107: 2414–6 (English summary, p. 2458).

4. Thjømøe HM. Samfunnsinformasjon – problemer og muligheter, belyst ved en evaluering av Ernéringskampanjen 1982. Avdeling for samfunnsinformasjon, Bedriftsøkonomisk Institutt. Forskningsrapport 1/83, Oslo: Bedriftsøkonomisk Institutt, 1983.

5. Kraft P , Rise J. Public awareness and acceptance of an HIV/AIDS information campaign in Norway. Health Educ Res 1988; 3: 31–9.

6. Aarø LE , Helland S , Hildal G. Virkninger av to tiltak mot røyking. En mindre spørreskjemaundersøkelse blant husstander i Oppland. Tidsskr Nor Légeforen 1987; 107: 2421–3 (English summary, p. 2458).

7. Søgaard AJ. The effect of a mass media dental health education campaign. Health Educ Res 1988; 3: 243–55.

8. Warholm N , Aarø LE. Helseopplysning gjennom massemedia. En undersøkelse omkring Dagbladets jogge-kampanje sommeren 1979. Tidsskr Nor Légeforen 1983; 103: 469–76 (English summary, p. 504).

9. Aarø LE , Karlsen E , Vaa T , Stenmarck S , Bjartveit K , Hjort PF. Hjerte- og karprogrammene i Oppland og Sogn og Fjordane. En oppsummering av ideer og organisering. Tidsskr Nor Légeforen 1987; 107: 2410–4 (English summary, p. 2457).

10.

10. Worren H. Helse og trivsel i Sør-Aurdal. Rapport nr. 4, Bagn, Sør-Aurdal: Lokalutvalget for helseopplysning, 1987.

11.

11. Gatherer A , Parfit J , Porter E , Vessey M. Is health education effective? Abstracts, bibliography and overview of evaluated studies. London: The Health Education Council, 1979.

12.

12. Nasjonalforeningen for folkehelsen. Hjerte for livet. Gallup's omnibus. Oslo: Nasjonalforeningen for folkehelsen, 1987.

13.

13. McGuire WJ. Public communication as a strategy for introducing health-promoting behavioral change. Prev Med 1984; 13: 299–319.

14.

14. Wiio J , Puska P , Koskela K , McAlister A. Television in national promotion in Finland: The “Keys to health” TV-program in 1982. In: Leathar DS , ed Health education and the media II. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 1982; 31–43.

15.

15. Jacobs DR jr , Luepker RV , Middelmark MB , Folsom AR , Pirie PL , Mascioli SR , Hannan PJ , Pechacek TF , Bracht N , Carlaw RW , Kline FG , Blackburn H. Community-wide prevention strategies: Evaluation design of the Minnesota heart health program. J Chr Dis 1986; 39: 775–88.

16.

16. Atkin CK. Research evidence on mass mediated health communication campaigns. In: Nimmo D , ed. Communication Yearbook, Vol 3. New Jersey: Transaction Books, 1978; 655–68.

17.

17. Maccoby N , Farquar JW , Wook PD , Alexander J. Reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease: Effect of community-based campaign on kowledge and behavior. Community Health 1977; 3: 100–14.

18.

18. Aarø LE. Research on health promotion and lifestyles. A report to the Public Health Research Priority Committee, The Academy of Finland. Paper presented 12.5.1988 at the University of Helsinki, Department of Public Health, Division of Health Care Administration, Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 1988.

19.

19. Sandell R. Information och beteendepåverkan. In: Arvidsson O , ed. Att förändra levnadsett. Rapport frän et symposium om metoder att förbättra folkhälsan, 1. och 2. oktober 1981. Stockholm: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, nr 3, 1982; 21–41.

20.

20. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 3rd ed. New York: The Free Press, 1983.

21.

21. Aarø LE. Health behaviour and socieconomic status. A survey among the adult population in Bergen: University of Bergen, 1986, 316 pp. Thesis.

22.

22. Botten G , Bjerkedal T. Ulikheter i helsevaner i Norge. Tidsskr Nor Légeforen 1988; 108: 157–62 (English summary, p. 164).

23.

23. Richards ND. Methods and effectiveness of health education: The past, present and future of social scientific involvement. Soc Sci Med 1975; 9: 141–56.

24.

24. Antonovsky A , Kats R. The model dental patient: An empirical study of preventive health behaviour. Soc Sci Med 1970; 4: 367–79.