This is the first part of a longitudinal follow-up study of 218 consecutively sterilized women. The operations were performed at the Gynaecological Department of Akershus Central Hospital during the period May 22nd 1973 to February 1, 1974. The mean age of the women was 33.5 years, their mean parity 2.8. They could not be distinguished from the women of the same age in the county at large with regard to incomes, education or housing conditions. The usage of contraception was widespread, but not consistent. Fifty-eight per cent of the operations were performed postabortion, 69% of the women had at least one, 21% at least two induced abortions before the sterilization. Family planning was the predominant stated motive for sterilization, and the present study indicates that the sterilization legislation of 1934 was outdated some years before it was succeeded by a new law. Sterilization was suggested by the doctor in 40%, at abortion application in 30%.
BerthelsenH. G.: Sterilisatio tubarum. The subjective sequelae as shown by a follow-up of 198 patients. Dan Med Bull4: 107, 1957.
4.
BørdahlP. E.BergsjøP.: Metoder ved sterilisering av kvinner ved norske sykehus. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen100: 2030, 1980.
5.
BørdahlP. E.SolbergM.LangengenH.: Complications and short-term consequences of tubal sterilization. A personal three and twelve month follow-up investigation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, in press.
6.
BørdahlP. E.BergsjøP.SolbergM.: Tubal sterilization. A controlled comparison of the Pomeroy resection technique and the laparoscopic electrocoagulation of the tubes. Ann Chir Gynaecol, in press.
7.
BørdahlP. E.: The Social and gynecological long-term consequences of tubal sterilization. A persona six year follow-up investigation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, in press.
8.
BørdahlP. E.: The attitudes of sterilized women to contraceptive sterilization. Scand J Soc Med, in press.
9.
BørdahlP. E.: Long-term regret among 216 sterilized women. A six year follow-up investigation. Scand J Soc Med, in press.
10.
BørdahlP. E.: Tubal sterilization. A prospective long-term investigation of 218 sterilized women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, Suppl., in press.
11.
CoureyN. G.CunananR. G.: Combined laparoscopic sterilization and pregnancy termination. II. J Reprod Med10: 291, 1973.
12.
EdwardsL. E.HakansonE. Y.: Changing status of tubal sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol115: 347, 1974.
13.
EkbladM.: The prognosis after sterilization on social-psychiatric grounds: A follow-up study of 225 women. Acta Psychiatr Scand37 (Suppl. 161): 1961.
14.
EvangK.: Sterilisering etter lov av 1. juni 1934 om adgang til sterilisering m.v. Helsedirektoratet, Oslo, 1955.
15.
GrünfeldB.: Legal abort i Norge. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø, 1973.
16.
HarbitzH. F.: Sterilisasjonsspørsmålet i praksis. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen75: 417, 1955.
17.
HertoftP.: En gennomgang af 162 sterilisationsoperationer på kvinder. Ugeskr Læger118: 1222, 1956.
18.
JensenF.LesterJ.: Ten years of tubal sterilization by the Madlenet method. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand36: 324, 1957.
19.
JunkerH.: Laparoskopische Tubensterilisation mit der “Einschnitt-Technik”. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd34: 952, 1974.
NoackT.ØstbyL.: Fertility among Norwegian women. Results from the fertility survey of 1977. Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway, Oslo, 1981.
27.
NoackT.ØstbyL.: Childless or childfree? A descriptive study of sterilization, infecundity and intentional childlessness. Read at Nordisk Demografisk Symposium, Kungälv, 1982.
28.
NortmanD. L.: Sterilization and the birth rate. Stud Family Planning11: 286, 1980.
29.
Population and housing census 1970, vol. II: Industry, occupation, working hours etc. Table 8, p. 71. Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway, Oslo, 1975.
30.
Population and housing census 1970, vol. III: Education. Tbl 5, p. 51. Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway, Oslo, 1975.
31.
Population and housing census 1970, vol. V: Housing statistics. Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway, Oslo, 1975. (a) Tbl 5, p. 45. (b) Tbl 16, p. 104.
