The aim of this paper is to grade and compare national surveillance systems and strategies, as well as the levels of physical activity (PA), and fitness for school-aged children and adolescents in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden.
Methods:
Surveillance systems for the three countries were evaluated based on the quality and representativeness of the data used for the Active Healthy Kids (AHK) Global Matrix 4.0 report card. Governmental strategies for repeated data collection were also evaluated. Both were graded by the authors of the present paper, and grades from 1 (excellent) to 5 (very poor) were set. The levels of PA and fitness reported in the country report cards were also compared.
Results:
The national surveillance strategy grades for 10 different PA and fitness indicators varied between 1 and 5 for Denmark, 1 and 2 for Finland, and 1 and 5 for Sweden. The surveillance strategy for organized sport participation and active transportation was graded as excellent for all, whereas the surveillance strategy related to community and environment was rated 4 in Denmark, and 1 in the other countries. Furthermore, the grades for the quality of the methodology used in collecting the ten indicators for the AHK compilation varied between 1 and 3 for Denmark, 1 and 2 for Finland, and 1 and 5 for Sweden; however, the methodologies varied largely between countries making direct comparison of these results difficult.
Conclusions:
Systematic surveillance of PA tends to be superior in Finland compared with Denmark and Sweden. Levels of PA and fitness among school-aged children and adolescents seem similar, but it is difficult to draw conclusions due to different methodologies used.
MalinaRM.Physical activity and fitness: pathways from childhood to adulthood. Am J Hum Biol2001;13:162–72.
2.
GutholdRStevensGARileyLM, et al. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1.6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc Health2020;4:23–35.
3.
FarooqAMartinAJanssenX, et al. Longitudinal changes in moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev2020;21:e12953.
4.
RyomKSimonsenCBEshøjS, et al. Tackling physical inactivity in Scandinavia: a narrative review of reviews supplemented by expert interviews. Scand J Public Health2023;51:125–36.
5.
SollerhedA-COlesenLGFrobergK, et al. Movement and physical activity in early childhood education and care policies of five Nordic countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021;18:13226.
6.
KauttoMHeikkiläMHvindenB, et al. Nordic social policy. In: KauttoMHeikkiläMHvindenBMarklundSPlougN (eds) Changing Welfare States. London: Routledge, 1999.
7.
MangsetPKangasASkot-HansenD, et al. Nordic cultural policy. Int J Cult Policy2008;14:1–5.
8.
HortSEO. Sweden: aging welfare and social policy in the twenty-first century. In: JingT-kKuhnleSPanY, et al. (eds) Aging welfare and social policy: China and the Nordic countries in comparative perspective. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp.73–90.
9.
SahlbergP.Finnish Lessons: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press, 2011.
10.
KaasaAVadiMVarblaneU.Regional cultural differences within European countries: evidence from multi-country surveys. Int J Manag Rev2014;54:825–52. DOI: 10.1007/s11575-014-0223-6.
11.
GreveB.What characterise the Nordic welfare state model. J Soc Sci2007;3:43–51.
12.
JasilionisD.Increases in socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in Nordic countries: growing controversies between the changing welfare state and public health?. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024Jan1;78(1):1–2.
13.
LeijonMAlgotsonABernhardssonS, et al. Generation Pep–study protocol for an intersectoral community-wide physical activity and healthy eating habits initiative for children and young people in Sweden. Frontiers in Public Health. 2024Feb16;12:1299099.
14.
Delisle NyströmCCarlanderACasselS, et al. Physical activity and screen time in Swedish children and adolescents: the generation pep study 2018–2021. Acta Paediatr2023;112: 460–8.
15.
AsuntaPKämppiKNgK, et al. Results from Finland’s 2022 Para Report Card on physical activity for children and adolescents with disabilities. Adapt Phys Activ Q2022;40:475–84.
16.
NgKSitCArbour-NicitopoulosK, et al. Global Matrix of Para Report Cards on physical activity of children and adolescents with disabilities. Adapt Phys Activ Q2023;1:1–22.
17.
ChalkleyAMiltonK.A critical review of national physical activity policies relating to children and young people in England. J Sport Health Sci2021;10:255–62.
18.
NauTBellewWSmithBJ, et al. Formative assessment: Is Australia ready for a physical activity surveillance system?Aust N Z J Public Health2023;47:100045.
19.
ReillyJJAubertSBrazo-SayaveraJ, et al. Surveillance to improve physical activity of children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ2022;100:815.
20.
FletcherGFLandolfoCNiebauerJ, et al. Promoting physical activity and exercise: JACC health promotion series. J Am Coll Cardiol2018; 72:1622–39.
21.
ChooiYCDingCMagkosF.The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism2019;92:6–10.
22.
DaleLPVanderlooLMooreS, et al. Physical activity and depression, anxiety, and self-esteem in children and youth: an umbrella systematic review. MENPA2019;16:66–79.
23.
World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world: at-a-glance, 2018. https://books.google.dk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=RnOyDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA48&dq=World+Health+Organization.+Global+action+plan+on+physical+activity+2018%E2%80%932030:+more+active+people+for+a+healthier+world:+ata-+glance,+2018&ots=GQhvScPwWp&sig=I8CpfLGtHcp8EpWfRstjET2Ey7w&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
24.
AubertSBarnesJDDemchenkoI, et al. Global matrix 4.0 physical activity report card grades for children and adolescents: results and analyses from 57 countries. J Phys Activ Health2022;19:700–28.
25.
TremblayMSBarnesJDDemchenkoI, et al. Active healthy kids global alliance Global Matrix 4.0—a resource for physical activity researchers. J Phys Activ Health2022;1:1–7.
26.
BullFMiltonKKahlmeierS.Health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) policy audit tool (PAT): version 2. Regional Office for Europe: World Health Organization, 2015.
27.
ManzKBurchartzANiessnerC, et al. The challenge of incomplete data in accelerometer studies: characteristics of nonparticipation and noncompliance in a nationwide sample of adolescents and young adults in Germany. J Phys Activ Health2023;20:226–38.
28.
RakićJHamrikZDzielskaA, et al. A focus on adolescent physical activity, eating behaviours, weight status and body image in Europe, central Asia and Canada. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children international report from the 2021/2022 survey. Volume 4, World Health Organization 2024.
KjellenbergKEkblomÖStålmanC, et al. Associations between physical activity patterns, screen time and cardiovascular fitness levels in Swedish adolescents. Children2021;8:998.
31.
PedersenJRasmussenMGOlesenLG, et al. Recreational screen media use in Danish school-aged children and the role of parental education, family structures, and household screen media rules. Prev Med2022;155:106908.
32.
HaapalaHLHirvensaloMHKulmalaJ, et al. Changes in physical activity and sedentary time in the Finnish Schools on the Move program: a quasi-experimental study. Scand J Med Sci Sports2017;27:1442–53.
33.
TomkinsonGRCarverKDAtkinsonF, et al. European normative values for physical fitness in children and adolescents aged 9–17 years: results from 2 779 165 Eurofit performances representing 30 countries. Br J Sports Med2018;52: 1445–56.
34.
WeintraubWSDanielsSRBurkeLE, et al. Value of primordial and primary prevention for cardiovascular disease: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation2011;124:967–90.
35.
BostadISolbergM. Rooms of togetherness: Nordic ideals of knowledge in education. In: The Nordic education model in context. London: Routledge, 2022.
36.
WardMRTylerREdwardsLC, et al. The AHK-Wales Report Card 2018: Policy measures-is it possible to ‘score’ qualitative data?Health Promot Int2021; 36: 1151–9.
37.
TcymbalAGeliusPAbu-OmarK, et al. Cross-country collaboration for physical activity promotion: experiences from the European Union Physical Activity Focal Points Network. Eur J Public Health2022;32: i14–21. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac079
38.
World Health Organization. 2021 physical activity factsheets for the European Union Member States in the WHO European Region. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, 2021.
39.
WenhuaZQamarFAbdaliT-AN, et al. Blockchain technology: security issues, healthcare applications, challenges and future trends. Electronics2023;12:546.
40.
RyomKChristiansenSRElbeAM, et al. The Danish “11 for Health” program raises health knowledge, well-being, and fitness in ethnic minority 10-to 12-year-olds. Scand J Med Sci Sports2022;32:138–51.
LyyraNThorsteinssonEBErikssonC, et al. The association between loneliness, mental well-being, and self-esteem among adolescents in four Nordic countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021;18:7405.
