The persistence of health inequalities means that many public health professionals face an ongoing task to develop and update policies to tackle them. However, although the inequalities might be unchanged, the political priorities in the many policy areas involved are changing and the ambition to reduce the health divide is constantly facing strong forces pushing in the opposite direction. Recent proposals to re-think health inequalities need to be treated with caution because they are disconnected from what is needed for policy-making in this area. From our experience of 35 years in developing strategies to tackle health inequalities, we still see many entry points with space for local and national improvements, but it is crucial to ask the right questions. The aim of this Commentary is to present a new framework of eight questions that might provide a helpful structure for the necessary dialogue between researchers and policy-makers. Even if answers are not yet available for all of them, we believe that discussing them for a specific population in a specific political context will be fruitful to inform policy on the ground.
DiderichsenFDahlgrenGWhiteheadM. Beyond ‘commercial determinants’: Shining a light on privatization and political drivers of health inequalities. Eur J Public Health2021;31:672–3. DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckab020.
2.
DahlgrenGDiderichsenF. Strategies for equity in health: Report from Sweden. Int J Health Serv1986;16:517–37. DOI:10.2190/27K4-DHK1-CDCB-9P94.
3.
WhiteheadMDahlgrenG. What can be done about inequalities in health?Lancet1991;338:1059–63. DOI:10.1016/0140-6736(91)91911-d.
4.
All European Academies and Federation of European Academies of Medicine. Health inequalities research – new methods, better insights?Berlin: Allea, 2021. DOI:10.26356/health-inequalities.
5.
BengtssonTDribeMHelgertzJ. When did the health gradient emerge? Social class and adult mortality in southern Sweden, 1813–2015. Demography2020;57:953–77. DOI:10.1007/s13524-020-00877-5.
6.
DiderichsenF. How did Sweden fail the pandemic?Int J Health Serv2021;51:970–4. DOI:10.1177/0020731421994848.
7.
WhiteheadMTaylor-RobinsonDBarrB. Poverty, health, and Covid-19. BMJ2021;372:n376. DOI:10.1136/bmj.n376.
8.
BambraC. Levelling up: Global examples of reducing health inequalities. Scand J Public Health. Epub ahead of print 19June2021. DOI: 10.1177/14034948211022428.
9.
BurströmB. Social differentials in the decline of infant mortality in Sweden in the twentieth century: The impact of politics and policy. Int J Health Serv2003;33:723–41. DOI:10.2190/9GMR-TA8W-LA3B-5E2A.
10.
MackenbachJP. Re-thinking health inequalities. Eur J Public Health2020;30:615. DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckaa001.
11.
MadsenMAndersenAMChristensenK, et al. Does educational status impact adult mortality in Denmark? A twin approach. Am J Epidemiol2010;172:225–34. DOI:10.1093/aje/kwq072.
12.
Davey SmithG. Post-modern epidemiology: When methods meet matter. Am J Epidemiol2019;188:1410–19. DOI:10.1093/aje/kwz064.
LagerACJTorssanderJ. Causal effect of education on mortality. PNAS2012;109:8461–6. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1105839109.
15.
SimpsonJAlbaniVBellZ, et al. Effects of social security policy reforms on mental health and inequalities: A systematic review of observational studies in high-income countries. Soc Sci Med2021;272:113717. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113717.
16.
McMartinAConleyD. Commentary: Mendelian randomization and education – challenges remain. Int J Epidemiol2020;49:1193–206. DOI:10.1093/ije/dyaa160.
17.
TillmannTVaucherJOkbayA, et al. Education and coronary heart disease: Mendelian randomisation study. BMJ. 2017:358:j3542. DOI:10.1136/bmj.j3542.
18.
DiderichsenFHallqvistJWhiteheadM. Differential vulnerability and susceptibility: How to make use of recent development in our understanding of mediation and interaction to tackle health inequalities. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48:268–74. DOI:10.1093/ije/dyy167.
19.
HicksBVeronesiGWhiteheadM, et al. Roles of allostatic load, lifestyle and clinical risk factors in mediating the association between education and coronary heart disease risk in Europe. J Epidemiol Community Health2021;75:1147–54. DOI:10.1136/jech-2020-215394.
DaltonSOOlsenMHJohansenC, et al. Socioeconomic inequality in cancer survival – changes over time. A population-based study, Denmark, 1987–2013. Acta Oncol2019;58:737–44. DOI:10.1080/0284186X.2019.1566772.
23.
McAllisterANylénLBackhansM, et al. Do ‘flexicurity’ policies work for people with low education and health problems?Int J Health Serv2015;45:679–705. DOI:10.1177/0020731415600408.
FowlerHMinicozziPLuque-FernandezMA, et al. The role of comorbidities in the social gradient in cancer survival in Europe. In: LaunoyGZadnikVColemanMP (eds) Social environment and cancer in Europe. Cham: Springer, 2020. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-69329-9_18.
26.
Plana-RipollOPedersenC BAgerboE, et al. A comprehensive analysis of mortality-related health metrics associated with mental disorders: A nationwide, register-based cohort study. Lancet Oncology2019;394:1827–35. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32316-5.
27.
DiderichsenFBenderAMLythAC, et al. Mediating role of multimorbidity in inequality in mortality: A register study on the Danish population. J Epidemiol Community Health. Epub ahead of print 3December2021. DOI: 10.1136//jech-2021-218211.
28.
WallaceR. Dead epidemiologists. On the origins of COVID-19. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2020.
29.
HillMASowersJRMantzorosCS. COVID-19 and obesity pandemics converge into a syndemic requiring urgent and multidisciplinary action. Metabolism2021;114:154408. DOI:10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154408.
30.
DiderichsenF. Investing in integrative active labour market policies. In: BültmannUSiegristJ (eds) Handbook of disability, work and health. Cham: Springer, 2020, pp. 661–74. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-75381-2_34-1.
31.
MarteauTMWhiteMRutterH, et al. Increasing healthy life expectancy equitably in England by 5 years by 2035: Could it be achieved?Lancet2019;393: 2571–3. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31510-7.
SmithSMWallaceEO’DowdT, et al. Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2016;3:CD006560. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub3.
34.
ScheeleCELittleIDiderichsenF. Governing health equity in Scandinavian municipalities: The inter-sectorial challenge. Scand J Public Health2018;46:57–67. DOI:10.1177/1403494816685538.
35.
MondalSvan BelleSMaioniA. Learning from intersectoral action beyond health: A meta-narrative review. Health Policy Plan2021;36:552–71. DOI:10.1093/heapol/czaa163.
36.
HoltDHCareyGRodMH. Time to dismiss the idea of a structural fix within government? An analysis of intersectoral action for health in Danish municipalities. Scand J Public Health2018;46:48–57. DOI:10.1177/1403494818765705.
DöringNLundbergMDalmanC, et al. Labour market position of young people and premature mortality in adult life: A 26-year follow-up of 569 528 Swedish 18 year-olds. Lancet Reg Health Eur2021;3:100048. DOI:10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100048.
39.
JensenNKBrønnum-HansenHAndersenI, et al. Too sick to work, too healthy to qualify: A cross-country analysis of the effect of changes to disability benefits. J Epidemiol Community Health2019;73:717–22. DOI:10.1136/jech-2019-212191.
40.
CooksonRAsariaMAliS, et al. Health equity monitoring for healthcare quality assurance. Soc Sci Med2018;198:148–156. DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.004.
