BrownsonRCFieldingJEGreenLW.Building capacity for evidence-based public health: reconciling the pulls of practice and the push of research. Annu Rev Public Health2018;39:27–53.
7.
OliverKCairneyP.The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics. Palgrave Commun2019;5:1–11.
8.
SalajanATsolovaSCiottiM, et al. To what extent does evidence support decision making during infectious disease outbreaks? A scoping literature review. Evid Policy2020;16:453–75.
9.
ToppLMairDSmillieL, et al. Knowledge management for policy impact: the case of the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre. Palgrave Commun2018;4:1–10.
10.
BensimonCMUpshurRE.Evidence and effectiveness in decisionmaking for quarantine. Am J Public Health2007;97:S44–8.
11.
GreenhalghTRussellJ.Evidence-based policymaking: a critique. Perspect Biol Med2009;52:304–18.
12.
RosellaLCWilsonKCrowcroftNS, et al. Pandemic H1N1 in Canada and the use of evidence in developing public health policies – a policy analysis. Soc Sci Med2013;83:1–9.
13.
BowsherGSullivanR.Why we need an intelligence-led approach to pandemics: supporting science and public health during COVID-19 and beyond. J R Soc Med2021;11:12–4.
14.
BoinALodgeMLuesinkM.Learning from the COVID-19 crisis: an initial analysis of national responses. Policy Design Pract2020;3:189–204.
15.
LiveraniMHawkinsBParkhurstJO.Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy. A systematic review. PLoS One2013;8:e77404.
BaldwinP.Disease and democracy: the industrialized world faces AIDS. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005.
19.
VallgårdaS.Public health policies: a Scandinavian model?Scand J Public Health2007;35:205–11.
20.
Danish Health Agency. Redegørelse: Prioritering af pandemivacciner 2009. Copenhagen: Sundhedsstyrelsen, 2011.
21.
Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency. Influensa A (H1N1) 2009 – utvardering av forberedelser och hantering av pandemin. Stockholm: Myndigheten för Samhällsskydd och Beredskap and Socialstyrelsen, 2011.
22.
TetlockPE.Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know? New edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.
MarchantRSamiaNIRosenO, et al. Learning as we go: an examination of the statistical accuracy of COVID19 daily death count predictions. medRxiv2020. DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.11.20062257.
SnowdenDJBooneME.A leader’s framework for decision making. Harv Bus Rev2007;85:68–76.
35.
UpshurRE.Seven characteristics of medical evidence. J Eval Clin Pract2000;6:93–7.
36.
KhanYFazliGHenryB, et al. The evidence base of primary research in public health emergency preparedness: a scoping review and stakeholder consultation. BMC Public Health2015;15:432.
37.
CarboneEGThomasEV.Science as the basis of public health emergency preparedness and response practice: the slow but crucial evolution. Am J Public Health2018;108:S383–6.
38.
NabaviSCohenYAMadhavanMV, et al. Preprint manuscripts and servers in the era of coronavirus disease 2019. J Eval Clin Pract2021;27:16–21.
39.
SoltaniPPatiniRRetracted COVID-19 articles: a side-effect of the hot race to publication. Scientometrics2020;125:819–22.
BoinAMcconnellAHartP (eds). Governing after crisis – the politics of investigation, accountability and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
PierreJ.Nudges against pandemics: Sweden’s COVID-19 containment strategy in perspective. Policy Soc2020;39:478–93.
52.
ChristiansenPMNiklassonBÖhbergP.Does politics crowd out professional competence? The organisation of ministerial advice in Denmark and Sweden. West Eur Polit2016;39:1230–50.
ÖbergSAWockelbergH.Agency control or autonomy? Government steering of Swedish government agencies 2003–201. Int Public Manag J. Epub ahead of print 11 August 2020. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2020.1799889.
55.
EllisR.Presidential lightning rods: the politics of blame avoidance. Kansas, MO: University Press of Kansas, 1994.
ChristensenTLaegreidP.Balancing governance capacity and legitimacy – how the Norwegian government handled the COVID-19 crisis as a high performer. Public Adm Rev. Epub ahead of print 22 May 2020. DOI: 10.1111/puar.13241.
65.
RubinODe VriesDH.Diverging sensemaking frames during the initial phases of the COVID-19 outbreak in Denmark. Policy Design Pract2020;3:277–96.