Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Aims:

The major causes of social inequalities in health are found outside of healthcare. However, healthcare can also play a role in maintaining, reducing, or reinforcing inequality. We present and discuss results from a panel study of doctors’ views on whether and how socioeconomic factors should play a role in clinical decision making.

Methods:

The panel comprised a representative sample of Norwegian doctors, established in 1994. For the current study, the doctors received postal questionnaires in 2008, 2012 and 2016. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, factor analysis and mixed models for repeated measurements.

Results:

The sample sizes were 1072 (65%), 1279 (71%) and 1605 (73%), respectively. The doctors were increasingly positive towards considering socioeconomic factors, and reported giving more time and advice and asking for less pay to compensate for unfavorable socioeconomic factors. General practitioners were more likely to consider socioeconomic factors and changed their practice accordingly compared to other clinicians. The percentage of doctors who agreed that different amounts of resources should be used to obtain similar health effects was high and increased over time.

Conclusions:

Increasingly more doctors are willing to consider patients’ socioeconomic factors in clinical care. This could be contrary to professional ethics, in which only medical need should count. However, it depends on how ‘need’ is interpreted. As treatment outcomes partly depend on non–medical factors, socioeconomic factors should be considered because they influence patients’ ability to benefit from medical care. Equality requires mitigating factors with negative impacts on health outcomes.

Keywords

Social inequality equity doctors medical ethics healthcare mixed models Norway

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: WHO, 2008.

Pickett

Wilkinson

RG.

Income inequality and health: a causal review. Soc Sci Med 2015;128:316–326.

Mackenbach

Artnik

, et al. Trends in inequalities in mortality amenable to health care in 17 European countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017;36:1110–1118.

Organisation for Economic Co–operation and Development. Health for everyone? Social Inequalities in Health and Health Systems. Paris: OECD Health Policy Studies, 2019.

Marmot

The Health Gap: The challenge of an unequal world: the argument. Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:1312–1318.

Mackenbach

Stirbu

Roskam

A–JR

, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2468–2481.

Doorslaer

Masseria

Koolman

Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. CMAJ 2006;174: 177–183.

Cookson

Propper

Asaria

, et al. Socio–economic inequalities in health care in England. Fiscal Stud 2016;37:371–403.

Devaux

Income–related inequalities and inequities in health care services utilisation in 18 selected OECD countries. Eur J Health Econ 2015;16:21–33.

10.

Bringedal

Tufte

PA.

Social and diagnostic inequality in health. Scand J Public Health 2012;40:656–662.

11.

Burgess

Warren

Phelan

, et al. Stereotype threat and health disparities: what medical educators and future physicians need to know. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25(Suppl. 2):S169–S177.

12.

FitzGerald

Hurst

Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics 2017;18:19.

13.

Godager

Iversen

. Sosial ulikhet i bruk av helsetjenester. In Borgen et al (ed.). Helsetjenestens nye logikk. Oslo: Akademika, 2014.

14.

Verlinde

De Laender

De Maesschalck

, et al. The social gradient in doctor–patient communication. Int J Equity Health 2012;11:12.

15.

Williams

Jackson

PB.

Social sources of racial disparities in health. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:325–334.

16.

Cooper

Cutler

Desvigne–Nickens

, et al. Trends and disparities in coronary heart disease, stroke, and other cardiovascular diseases in the United States: findings of the national conference on cardiovascular disease prevention. Circulation 2000;102:3137–3147.

17.

Williams

Sternthal

Wright

RJ.

Social determinants: taking the social context of asthma seriously. Pediatrics 2009;123(Suppl.):S174–S184.

18.

Cookson

Walden

. Inequality and the NHS hospital crisis: why social disadvantage needs attention. Br J Hosp Med (London) 2017 Feb 2; 78(2): 64–65.

19.

Gulbrandsen

Fugelli

Sandvik

, et al. Influence of social problems on management in general practice: multipractice questionnaire survey. BMJ 1998;317:28–32.

20.

Moscrop

Ziebland

Roberts

, et al. A systematic review of reasons for and against asking patients about their socioeconomic contexts. Int J Equity Health 2019;18:112.

21.

Saunes

Karanikolos

Sagan

. Norway: Health system review. Copenhagen: Health Systems in Transition European Observatory, 2020.

22.

American Board of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:243–246.

23.

Paquette

Patel

Doctors should care for patients and social justice. Scientific American 2019 October 17. Blog.

24.

Declaration of Geneva 1948. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-geneva/ (accessed July 2021).

25.

Hurst

SA.

Just care: should doctors give priority to patients of low socioeconomic status?

J Med Ethics 2009;35:7–11.

26.

Bringedal

Bærøe

Feiring

Social disparities in health and the physician’s role: a call for clarifying the professional ethical code. World Med J 2011; 5: 196–198.

27.

Bærøe

Bringedal

Just health: on the conditions for acceptable and unacceptable priority settings with respect to patients’ socioeconomic status. J Med Ethics 2011;37:526–529.

28.

The Norwegian Public Health Act [Lov om folkehelsearbeid] Chapter 1, §3. Oslo: Ministry of Health. https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2011-06-24-29 (accessed July 2021).

29.

Health NIoP. Sosiale helseforskjeller i Norge. FHI; Folkehelseinstituttet: Sosiale helseforskjeller. I: Folkehelserapporten - Helsetilstanden i Norge (nettdokument). Oslo: Folkehelseinstituttet (oppdatert 2018); https://www.fhi.no/nettpub/hin/grupper/sosiale-helseforskjeller/ (accessed July 2021). 2021.

30.

Willems

De Maesschalck

Deveugele

, et al. Socio–economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: does it make a difference? Patient Educ Counsel 2005;56:139–146.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Should a patient’s socioeconomic status count in decisions about treatment in medical care? A longitudinal study of Norwegian doctors

Abstract

Aims:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material