Aim: This study aimed to explore the knowledge on the second victim phenomenon (SVP) in health care, more specifically within the speciality of obstetrics. Methods: An extensive electronic search of multiple databases, with additional hand searching of the reference lists of pertinent articles regarding the SVP, was performed from May 2017 to December 2018. Results: A review of the literature suggests consistent evidence of the substantial impact of adverse medical events on health-care professionals across a range of specialities. The effects of an adverse medical event for the health-care professional are ominous, with many experiencing feelings of sadness, guilt and anxiety, as well as some displaying symptoms consistent with post-traumatic stress disorder. Negative effects may be exacerbated for health-care professionals in the case of an adverse maternal event due to its highly sensitive and dramatic nature, involving both maternal and neonatal lives. The provision of timely and effective support at the individual and more specifically the organisational level has been positively correlated with a second victim’s recovery. Yet, limited organisations have formal support interventions designed specifically for the needs of the second victim. Conclusions: It is evident that the consequences of adverse medical events on health-care professionals can be intense and numerous. The unique nature and high sensitivities surrounding obstetric care have the potential to exacerbate the negative consequences for the health-care professional following an adverse event. Still, there remains a dearth of information of the extent of adverse medical events and the SVP in the speciality of obstetrics.
McIntyreNPopperK.The critical attitude in medicine: the need for a new ethics. BMJ1983;287:1919–1923.
2.
JaeschkeR.Time for reflection on patient’s safety in healthcare. Pol Arch Med Wewn2012;122:512–513.
3.
LeapeLLBrennanTALairdNMet al. The nature of adverse event in hospitalised patients – results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. New Engl J Med1991;324:377–384.
4.
BrennanTALeappeLLLairdNMet al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalised patients – results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. New Engl J Med1991;324:370–376.
5.
KohnTCorriganJMDonaldsonMS, eds. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2000.
6.
van PeltF. Peer support: healthcare professionals supporting each other after adverse medical events. Qual Saf Health Care2008;17:249–252.
7.
ClassenDResarRGriffinFet al. ‘Global trigger tool’ shows that adverse events in hospitals may be ten times greater than previously measured. Health Affairs2011;30:581–589.
8.
SoopMFryksmarkUKösterMet al. The incidence of adverse events in Swedish hospitals: a retrospective medical record review study. Int J Qual Health Care2009;21:285–291.
9.
JamesJT.A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf2013;9:122–128.
10.
MakaryMDanielM.Medical error – the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ2016;353:i2139.
11.
WilsonRMMichelPOlsenSet al. Patient safety in developing countries: retrospective estimation of scale and nature of harm to patients in hospital. BMJ2012;344:e832.
12.
UllströmSSachsMAHanssonJet al. Suffering in silence: a qualitative study of second victims of adverse events. BMJ Qual Saf2013;23:325–331.
13.
WuAW.Medical errors: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ2000;320:726–727.
14.
EdreesHHPaineLAFeroliERet al. Health care workers as second victims of medical error. Pol Arch Med Wewn2011;121:101–108.
15.
ScottSDHirschingerLEMcCoigMet al. The natural history of recovery for the healthcare provider ‘second victim’ after adverse patient events. Qual Saf Health Care2009;18:325–330.
16.
ManserT.Managing the aftermath of critical incidents: meeting the needs of health-care providers and patients. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol2011;25:169–179.
17.
SeysDScottSDWuAet al. Supporting involved health care professionals (second victims) following an adverse health event: a literature review. Int J Nurs Stud2013;50:678–687.
18.
MiraJJCarrilloILorenzoSet al. The aftermath of adverse events in Spanish primary care and hospital health professionals. BMC Health Serv Res2015;15:151–160.
19.
CauldwellMChappellLCMurtaghGet al. Learning about maternal death and grief in the profession: a pilot qualitative study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand2015;94:1346–1353.
20.
MenezesMAHodgsonJMSahharMet al. ‘Taking its toll’: the challenges of working in fetal medicine. Birth2013;40:52–60.
21.
MarmarCRWeissDSMetzlerTJet al. Stress responses of emergency services personnel to the Loma Prieta earthquake Interstate 880 freeway collapse and control traumatic incidents. J Trauma Stress1996;9:63–85.
22.
IwuhIAFawcusSSchoemanL.Maternal near-miss audit in the Metro West maternity service, Cape Town, South Africa: a retrospective observational study. S Afr Med J2018;108:171–175.
23.
BatemanC.SAMA pitches in to help victims of adverse medical events. SAMJ S Afr Med J2015;105:337–338.
24.
DornetteWOrthoO.Death in the operating room. Curr Res Anesth Analg1956;35:545–569.
25.
SeysDWuAVan GervenEet al. Health care professionals as second victims after adverse events: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof2012;36:135–162.
26.
ScottSDHirschingerLECoxKRet al. Caring for our own: deploying a systemwide second victim rapid response team. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf2010;36:233–240.
27.
WachterR.Conversation with … Albert Wu, MD, MPH. Rockville, MD: AHRQ, WebM&M Perspectives on Safety, 2011.
28.
SachsMABaehrendtzSSellgrenSFet al. [Staff who have been involved in adverse events is left without help. Systematic support from colleagues and managers is desirable, according to interview study.] Lakartidningen2013;110:550–552.
29.
GallagherTHWatermanADEbersAGet al. Patients’ and physicians’ attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA2003;289:1001–1007.
30.
SirriyehRLawtonRGardnerPet al. Coping with medical error: a systematic review of papers to assess the effects of involvement in medical errors on healthcare professionals’ psychological well-being. Qual Saf Health Care2010;19:e43.
31.
WolfZRSerembusJFSmetzerJet al. Responses and concerns of healthcare providers to medication errors. Clin Nurse Spec2000;14:278–290.
32.
WestCPHuschkaMMNovotnyPJet al. Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: a prospective longitudinal study. JAMA2006;296:1071–1078.
33.
ShanafeltTDBalchCMBechampsGet al. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann Surg2010;251:995–1000.
34.
BeckCTLoGiudiceJGableRK.A mixed-methods study of secondary traumatic stress in certified nurse-midwives: shaken belief in the birth process. J Midwifery Womens Health2015;60:16–23.
35.
ShanafeltTDHasanODyrbyeLNet al. Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work–life balance in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2014. Mayo Clin Proc2015;90:1600–1613.
36.
QuillivanRRBurlisonJDBrowneEKet al. Patient safety culture and the second victim phenomenon: connecting culture to staff distress in nurses. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf2016;42:377–384.
37.
KrzanKDMerandiJMorvaySet al. Implementation of a ‘second victim’ program in a pediatric hospital. Am J Health Syst Pharm2015;72:563–567.
38.
BurlisonJDQuillivanRRScottDet al. The effects of the second victim phenomenon on work-related outcomes: connecting self-reported caregiver distress to turnover intentions and absenteeism. J Patient Saf. Epub ahead of print 2 Nov 2016. DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000301.
39.
WatermanADGarbuttJHazelEet al. The emotional impact of medical errors on practicing physicians in the United States and Canada. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf2007;33:467–476.
40.
VaithilingamNJainSDaviesD.Helping the helpers: debriefing following an adverse incident. Obstet Gynaecol2008;10:251–256.
41.
CoughlanBPowellDHigginsMF.The second victim: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2017;213:11–16.
42.
WahlbergASachesAJohannessonKet al. Post-traumatic stress symptoms in Swedish obstetricians and midwives after severe obstetric events: a cross sectional retrospective survey. BJOG2016;124:1264–1271.
43.
AibarLRabanaqueMJAibarCet al. Patient safety and adverse events related with obstetric care. Arch Gynecol Obstet2015;291:825–830.
44.
SchoonMGMotlolometsiMW.Poor maternal outcomes: a factor of poor professional systems design. S Afr Med J2012;102:784–786.
45.
ForsterAJFungICaugheySet al. Adverse events detected by clinical surveillance on an obstetric service. Obstet Gynecol2006;108:1073–1083.
46.
BakerGRNortonPGFlintoftVet al. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ2004;170:1678–1686.
47.
ThomasEJStuddertDMBurstinHRet al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care2000;38:261–271.
48.
ForsterAJAsmisTRClarkHDet al. Ottawa Hospital Patient Safety Study: incidence and timing of adverse events in patients admitted to a Canadian teaching hospital. CMAJ2004;170:1235–1240.
49.
GamboneJCReiterRC.Elements of a successful quality improvement and patient safety program in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am2008;35:129–145.
50.
McCreadySRussellR.A national survey of support and counselling after maternal death. Anaesthesia2009;64:1211–1217.
51.
LeinweberJCreedyDKRoweHet al. Responses to birth trauma and prevalence of posttraumatic stress among Australian midwives. Women Birth2017;30:40–45.
52.
SchrøderKLarsenPVJørgensenJSet al. Psychosocial health and well-being among obstetricians and midwives involved in traumatic childbirth. Midwifery2016;41:45–53.
53.
LanderLIConnorJAShahRKet al. Otolaryngologists’ responses to errors and adverse events. Laryngoscope2006;116:1114–1120.
54.
VenusEGalamEAubertJ-Pet al. Medical errors reported by French general practitioners in training: results of a survey and individual interviews. BMJ Qual Saf2012;21:279–286.
55.
HarrisonRLawtonRStewartK.Doctors experiences of adverse events in secondary care: the professional and personal impact. Clin Med2014;14:585–590.
56.
NevalainenMKuikkaLPitkalaK.Medical errors and uncertainty in primary healthcare: a comparative study of coping strategies among young and experienced GPs. Scand J Prim Health Care2014;32:84–89.
57.
HobgoodCHeviaATamayo-SarverJHet al. The influence of the causes and contexts of medical errors on emergency medicine residents’ responses to their errors: an exploration. Acad Med2005;80:758–764.
58.
EngelKGRosenthalMSutcliffeKM.Residents’ responses to medical error: coping, learning, and change. Acad Med2006;81:86–93.
59.
DenhamCR.TRUST: the 5 rights of the second victim. J Patient Saf2007;3:107–119.
60.
Van GervenESeysDPanellaMet al. Involvement of health-care professionals in an adverse event: the role of management in supporting their workforce. Pol Arch Med Wewn2014;124:313–320.
61.
MiraJJLorenzoSCarrilloIet al. Interventions in health organisations to reduce the impact of adverse events in second and third victims. BMC Health Serv Res2015;15:341.
62.
Department of Health. National policy for patient safety incident reporting and learning in the public health sector of South Africa. Department of Health, South Africa, 2016.
63.
TamburriLM.Creating healthy work environments for second victims of adverse events. AACN Adv Crit Care2017;28:366–374.
64.
PrattSDJachnaBR.Care of the clinician after an adverse event. Int J Obstet Anesth2015;24:54–63.
65.
EdreesHConnorsCPaineLet al. Implementing the RISE second victim support programme at the Johns Hopkins Hospital: a case study. BMJ Open2016;6:e011708.
NewmanMC. The emotional impact of mistakes on family physicians. Archives of Family Medicine1996;5:71–75.
68.
ScottSDMyraMM.Care at the point of impact: Insights into the second-victim experience. J Healthc Risk Manag2016;35:6–13.
69.
IedemaRSorensenRManiasEet al. Patients’ and family members’ experiences of open disclosure following adverse events. Int J Qual Health Care2008;20:421–432.
70.
Firth-CozensJ.Doctors, their wellbeing, and their stress. BMJ2003;326:670–671.
71.
HegneyDGReesCSEleyRet al. The contribution of individual psychological resilience in determining the professional quality of life of Australian nurses. Front Psychol2015;6:1613.
