Aim: The aim of this prospective four-year follow-up study was to examine how socioeconomic status (SES) and change in marital status are associated with the change in pedometer-measured physical activity (PA) in adulthood among participants in the ‘Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study’. Methods: Questionnaires were completed and pedometers worn at baseline in 2007 and again at follow-up in 2011 by 1051 Finnish adults (62.3% female, aged 30–45 years in 2007). A latent change score model was used to examine mean change in daily total steps, aerobic steps and non-aerobic steps during weekdays and weekend days between 2007 and 2011. Results: In women re-coupling or finding a new partner was associated with decrease in total steps (p=0.010) and being single was associated with increase in non-aerobic steps (p=0.047) during weekdays from 2007 to 2011 compared to women who were married. In men, divorcing was associated with decrease in non-aerobic steps (p=0.049). Conclusions: In order to promote PA in the general population of adults, it is recommended to pay attention to people with lower SES and those who have had changes in their marital status. These factors could be taken into account when developing strategies to promote PA among the adult population.
HaskellWLLeeIMPatePR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation2007;116:1081–93.
2.
LeeIMShiromaEJLobeloF, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet2012;380:219–29.
3.
DuHBennettDLiL, et al. Physical activity and sedentary leisure time and their associations with BMI, waist circumference, and percentage body fat in 0.5 million adults: the China Kadoorie Biobank study. Am J Clin Nutr2013;97:487–96.
4.
DingDLawsonKDKolbe-AlexanderTL, et al. The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet2016;38:1311–24.
5.
WHO. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2010.
6.
HallalPCAndersenLBBullFC, et al. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet2012;380:247–57.
7.
HagströmerMKwakLOjaP, et al. A 6-year longitudinal study of accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary time in Swedish adults. J Sci Med Sport2015;18:553–7.
8.
KwakLBerriganDVan DomelenD, et al. Examining differences in physical activity levels by employment status and/or job activity level: gender-specific comparisons between the United States and Sweden. J Sci Med Sport2016;19:482–7.
9.
PitsavosCPanagiotakosDBLentzasY, et al. Epidemiology of leisure-time physical activity in socio-demographic, lifestyle and psychological characteristics of men and women in Greece: the ATTICA Study. BMC Public Health2005;5:1.
10.
SabiaSvan HeesVTShipleyMJ, et al. Association between questionnaire- and acclerometer-assessed physical activity: the role of sociodemographic factors. Am J Epidemiol2014;179:781–90.
11.
BorodulinKMäkinenTELeino-ArjasP, et al. Leisure time physical activity in a 22-year follow-up among Finnish adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2012;9:121.
12.
AllenderSHutchinsonLFosterC.Life-change events and participation in physical activity: a systematic review. Health Promot Int2008;23:160–72.
13.
PelclovaJFrömelKŘepkaE, et al. Is pedometer-determined physical activity decreasing in Czech adults? Findings from 2008 to 2013. Int J Environ Res Public Health2016;13:1040.
14.
van PoppelMNMChinapawMJMMokkinkLB, et al. Physical activity questionnaires for adults. A systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med2010;40:565–600.
15.
PrinceSAAdamoKBHamelME, et al. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Physl Act2008;5:1–24.
16.
HirvensaloMTelamaRSchmidtMD, et al. Daily steps among Finnish adults: Variation by age, sex, and socioeconomic position. Scand J Pub Health2011;39:669–77.
17.
MansikkaniemiKJuonalaMTaimelaS.Cross-sectional associations between physical activity and selected coronary heart disease risk factors in young adults: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Ann Med2012;7:733–44.
18.
McArdleJJ.Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data. Ann Rev Psychol2009;60:577–605.
19.
de JongPF. Hierarchical regression analysis in structural equation modelling. Struct Equ Model1999;6:198–211.
20.
MuthénLKMuthénBO.Mplus - Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables. User’s Guide, Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén, 2015.
21.
MatthiessenJAndersenEWRaustorpA, et al. Reduction in pedometer-determined physical activity in the adult Danish population from 2007 to 2012. Scand J Public Health2015;43:525–33.
22.
MartinBWKahlmeirSRacioppiF, et al. Evidence-based physical activity promotion: HEPA Europe, the European network for the promotion of health-enhancing physical activity. J Public Health2006;14:53–7.
23.
AaltonenSRottensteinerMKaprioJ, et al. Motives for physical activity among active and inactive persons in their mid-30s. Scand J Med Sci Sport2014;24:727–35.
24.
KingACKiernanMAhnDK, et al. The effects of marital transitions on changes in physical activity: Results from a 10-year community study. Ann Behav Med1998;20:64–9.
25.
EngPMKawachiIFitzmauriceG, et al. Effects of marital transitions on changes in dietary and other health behaviours in US male health professionals. J Epidemiol Comm Health2005;59:56–62.
26.
HullEERofeyDLRobertsonRJ, et al. Influence of marriage and parenthood on physical activity: a 2-year prospective analysis. J Phys Act Health2010;7:577–83.
27.
OrtegaFBBrownWJLeeDC, et al. In fitness and health? A prospective study of changes in marital status and fitness in men and women. Am J Epidemiol2011;173:337–44.
28.
EngbergEAlenMKukkonen-HarjulaK.Life events and change in leisure time physical activity. Sports Med2012;42:433–47.
29.
ProperKCerinEOwenN.Neighborhood and individual socio-economic variations in the contribution of occupational physical activity to total physical activity. J Phys Act Health2006;3:179–90.
30.
MatsushitaNHaradaKAraoT.Socioeconomic position and work, travel, and recreation-related physical activity in Japanese adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health2015;15:916.
31.
VrazelJSaundersRWilcoxS.An overview and proposed framework of social-environmental influences on the physical-activity behavior of women. Am J Health Prom2008;23:2–12.
32.
MatthewsCEHagströmerMPoberDM, et al. Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc2012;44:S68–S76.
33.
SchrackJACooperRKosterA, et al. Assessing daily physical activity in older adults: Unraveling the complexity of monitors, measures, and methods. J Geront A: Biol Sci Med Sci2016;71:1039–48.
