Children with two homes: Psychological problems in relation to living arrangements in Nordic 2- to 9-year-olds

Abstract

Aim: Joint physical custody, children spending equal time in each parents’ respective home after a parental divorce, is particularly common in Nordic compared with other Western countries. Older children have been shown to fare well in this practice but for young children there are few existing studies. The aim of this paper is to study psychological problems in 2- to 9-year-old Nordic children in different family forms. Methods: Total symptom score according to the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as well as scores showing externalizing problems were compared among 152 children in joint physical custody, 303 in single care and 3207 in nuclear families through multiple linear regression analyses. Results: Children in single care had more psychological symptoms than those in joint physical custody (B = 1.08; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.67) and those in nuclear families had the least reported symptoms (B = −0.53; 95% CI −0.89 to −0.17). Externalizing problems were also lower in nuclear families (B = −0.28, 95% CI −0.52 to −0.04) compared with joint physical custody after adjusting for covariates. Conclusions: Young children with non-cohabiting parents suffered from more psychological problems than those in intact families. Children in joint physical custody had a lower total problem score than those in single care after adjusting for covariates. Longitudinal studies with information on family factors before the separation are needed to inform policy of young children’s post-separation living arrangements.

Keywords

Children preschoolers psychological problems divorce joint physical custody parental separation custody Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Nordic countries

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gíslason

Björk Eydal

(eds) Parental leave, childcare and gender equality in the Nordic countries – TemaNord. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, 2011, p. 562.

Fehlberg

Smyth

Maclean

et al . Family Policy Briefing 7 – Legislating to encourage shared time. Oxford: Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, 2011.

Bergström

Modin

Fransson

et al . Living in two homes: a Swedish national survey of wellbeing in 12 and 15 year olds with joint physical custody. BMC Pub Health 2013:13:868.

Bergström

Fransson

Fabian

et al . Pre-school children living in joint physical custody arrangements show less psychological symptoms than those living mostly or only with one parent. Acta Paediatr. Epub ahead of print 7 September 2017. DOI: 10.1111/apa.14004

Sodermans

Vanassche

Matthijs

Post-divorce custody arrangements and binuclear family structures of Flemish adolescents

Dem Res 2013;28:421–32.

Amato

Soblowski

JM.

The effects of divorce and marital discord on adult children’s psychological well-being. Am Soc Rev 2001;66:900–21.

Eisenberg

Gershoff

Fabes

et al . Mothers’ emotional expressivity and children’s behavior problems and social competence: mediation through children’s regulation. Psych 2001;37:475–90.

Warshak

RA.

Social science and parenting plans for young children: a consensus report. Psych Pub Policy Law 2014;20:46–67.

Pruett

McIntosh

Kelly

JB.

Parental separation and overnight care of young children, Part I: consensus through theoretical and empirical integration. Fam Court Rev 2014;52:240–55.

10.

Nielsen

Shared physical custody: summary of 40 studies on outcomes for children. J Div Remar 2014;55:613–35.

11.

Bergström

Fransson

Hjern

et al . Mental health in Swedish children living in joint physical custody and their parents’ life satisfaction: a cross-sectional study. Scand J Psychol 2014;55:433–9.

12.

Westphal

Monden

. Shared residence for children of divorce: testing the critics’ concerns. In: Westphal

(ed.) Are the kids alright? Essays on postdivorce residence arrangements and children’s well-being. Utrecht: Utrecht University, 2015:61–82.

13.

Pruett

Ebling

Insabella

Critical aspects of parenting plans for young children: interjecting data into the debate about overnights. Fam Court Rev 2004;42:39–59.

14.

McIntosh

Smyth

Kelahar

et al . Post-separation parenting arrangements and developmental outcomes for infants and children. Collected reports. Three reports prepared for the Australian Government Attorney-General’s Department, Canberra. Sydney: Family Transitions, 2010.

15.

Tornello

Emery

Rowen

et al . Overnight custody arrangements, attachment, and adjustment among very young children. J Mar Fam 2013;75:871–85.

16.

Köhler

NHV and child public health. Scand J Public Health 2015;43:29–32.

17.

Malmberg

Rydell

Smedje

Validity of the Swedish version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Swe)

Nord J Psych 2003;57:357–63.

18.

Goodman

Lamping

Ploubidis

GB.

When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): data from British parents, teachers and children. J Abn Child Psych 2010;38:1179–91.

19.

Amato

PR.

The well-being of children with gay and lesbian parents. Soc Sci Res 2012;41:771–4.

20.

Baude

Pearson

Drapeau

Child adjustment in joint physical custody versus sole custody: a meta-analytic review. J Div Remar 2016;57(5):338–60.

21.

Carlsund

Eriksson

Löfstedt

et al . Risk behaviour in Swedish adolescents: is shared physical custody after divorce a risk or a protective factor? Eur J Pub Health 2012;23:3–8.

22.

Lansford

JE.

Parental divorce and children’s adjustment. Perspect Psych Sci 2009;4:140–52.

23.

Campo

Fehlberg

Millward

et al . Shared parenting time in Australia: exploring children’s views. J Soc Welfare Fam Law 2012;34:295–313.

24.

Norsk Psykolog Forening. Samvær 0–3. Anbefalinger om samvær for de minste barna etter lov om barn og foreldre [Visitation 0–3. Recommendations regarding parenting visitation for the youngest children under the Act on Children and Parents]. Oslo: Norsk Psykolog Forening, 2014.

25.

Bastaits

Pasteels

Ponnet

et al . Adult non-response bias from a child perspective. Using child reports to estimate father’s non-response. Soc Sci Res 2015;49:31–41.

26.

Melli

Brown

Exploring a new family form : the shared time family. Intl J Law Pol Fam 2008;22:231–69.

27.

Gähler

Life after divorce: economic, social and psychological well-being among Swedish adults and children following family dissolution. PhD Thesis, Stockholm University, 1998.

28.

Rejmer

. Vårdnadstvister: En rättssociologisk studie av tingsrätts funktion vid handläggning av vårdnadskonflikter med utgångspunkt från barnets bästa. [Custody disputes: a socio-legal study of the role of district courts in the handling of custody disputes with the child’s best interest as a base]. University of Lund, 2003.