Aims: Up-to-date information on the accuracy between different anthropometric data collection methods is vital for the reliability of anthropometric data. A previous review on this matter was conducted a decade ago. Our aim was to conduct a literature review on the accuracy of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) against measured values for assessing obesity in adults. To obtain an overview of the present situation, we included studies published after the previous review. Differences according to sex, BMI groups, and continents were also assessed. Methods: Studies published between January 2006 and April 2017 were identified from a literature search on PubMed. Results: Our search retrieved 62 publications on adult populations that showed a tendency for self-reported height to be overestimated and weight to be underestimated when compared with measured values. The findings were similar for both sexes. BMI derived from self-reported height and weight was underestimated; there was a clear tendency for underestimation of overweight (from 1.8%-points to 9.8%-points) and obesity (from 0.7%-points to 13.4%-points) prevalence by self-report. The bias was greater in overweight and obese participants than those of normal weight. Studies conducted in North America showed a greater bias, whereas the bias in Asian studies seemed to be lower than those from other continents. Conclusions: With globally rising obesity rates, accurate estimation of obesity is essential for effective public health policies to support obesity prevention. As self-report bias tends to be higher among overweight and obese individuals, measured anthropometrics provide a more reliable tool for assessing the prevalence of obesity.
World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2000.
2.
SeidellJCHalberstadtJ. The global burden of obesity and the challenges of prevention. Ann Nutr Metab2015;66(Suppl. 2):7-12.
3.
World Health Organization. Global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013–2020. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2013.
4.
ChioleroAPeytremann-BridevauxIPaccaudF. Associations between obesity and health conditions may be overestimated if self-reported body mass index is used. Obes Rev2007;8:373–4.
5.
ShieldsMConnor GorberSTremblayMS. Estimates of obesity based on self-report versus direct measures. Health Rep2008, 19, 61–79
6.
Connor GorberSTremblayMMoherDet al. A comparison of direct vs. self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev2007, 8, 307–326.
7.
LarsonMR. Social desirability and self-reported weight and height. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord2000, 24, 663–665.
8.
MadrigalHSanchez-VillegasAMartinez-GonzalezMAet al. Underestimation of body mass index through perceived body image as compared to self-reported body mass index in the European Union. Public Health2000, 114, 468–473.
9.
ShohamDAHammondRRahmandadHet al. Modeling social norms and social influence in obesity. Curr Epidemiol Rep2015, 2, 1–79.
10.
RobinsonEChristiansenP. The changing face of obesity: exposure to and acceptance of obesity. Obesity2014, 22, 1380–1386.
11.
Connor GorberSTremblayMS. The bias in self-reported obesity from 1976 to 2005: a Canada-US comparison. Obesity2010, 18, 354–361.
12.
HattoriASturmR. The obesity epidemic and changes in self-report biases in BMI. Obesity2013, 21, 856–860.
13.
ShielyFPerryIJLutomskiJet al. Temporal trends in misclassification patterns of measured and self-report based body mass index categories: findings from three population surveys in Ireland. BMC Public Health2010, 10, 560.
14.
StommelMOsierN. Temporal changes in bias of body mass index scores based on self-reported height and weight. Int J Obes2013, 37, 461–467.
15.
IkedaN. Validity of self-reports of height and weight among the general adult population in Japan: findings from National Household Surveys, 1986. PLoS One2016, 11, e0148297
16.
LuSSuJXiangQet al. Accuracy of self-reported height, weight, and waist circumference in a general adult Chinese population. Popul Health Metr2016, 14, 30-016-0099-8.eCollection.
17.
AnaiAUedaKHaradaKet al. Determinant factors of the difference between self-reported weight and measured weight among Japanese. Environ Health Prev Med2015, 20, 447–454.
18.
Celis-MoralesCLivingstoneKMWoolheadCet al. How reliable is internet-based self-reported identity, socio-demographic and obesity measures in European adults?Genes Nutr2015, 10, 28.
19.
NiedzwiedzkaEDlugoszAWadolowskaL. Validity of self-reported height and weight in elderly Poles. Nutr Res Pract2015, 9, 319–327.
20.
SkeieGModeNHenningsenMet al. Validity of self-reported body mass index among middle-aged participants in the Norwegian Women and Cancer study. Clin Epidemiol2015, 7, 313–323.
21.
WrightFLGreenJReevesGet al. Validity over time of self-reported anthropometric variables during follow-up of a large cohort of UK women. BMC Med Res Methodol2015, 15, 81.
22.
HsiaoHWeaverDHsiaoJet al. Comparison of measured and self-reported anthropometric information among firefighters: implications and applications. Ergonomics2014, 57, 1886–1897.
23.
MagnussonKHaugenIKOsterasNet al. The validity of self-reported body mass index in a population-based osteoarthritis study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2014, 15, 442.
24.
MurphyGSnetselaarLMyersEet al. Self-reported health parameters compared with clinician measurements: methods in practice-based research. J Public Health Manag Pract2014, 20, 513–522.
25.
PostonWSJitnarinNHaddockCKet al. Accuracy of self-reported weight, height and BMI in US firefighters. Occup Med2014, 64, 246–254.
26.
PurseyKBurrowsTLStanwellPet al. How accurate is web-based self-reported height, weight, and body mass index in young adults?J Med Internet Res2014, 16, e4.
27.
TolonenHKoponenPMindellJSet al. Under-estimation of obesity, hypertension and high cholesterol by self-reported data: comparison of self-reported information and objective measures from health examination surveys. Eur J Public Health2014, 24, 941–948.
28.
TsaiEWPerngWMora-PlazasMet al. Accuracy of self-reported weight and height in women from Bogota, Colombia. Ann Hum Biol2014, 41, 473–476.
29.
XieYJHoSCLiuZMet al. Comparisons of measured and self-reported anthropometric variables and blood pressure in a sample of Hong Kong female nurses. PLoS One2014, 9, e107233.
30.
YoonKJangSNChunHet al. Self-reported anthropometric information cannot vouch for the accurate assessment of obesity prevalence in populations of middle-aged and older Korean individuals. Arch Gerontol Geriatr2014, 59, 584–592.
31.
BonnSETrolle LagerrosYBalterK. How valid are web-based self-reports of weight?J Med Internet Res2013, 15, e52.
32.
LassaleCPeneauSTouvierMet al. Validity of web-based self-reported weight and height: results of the Nutrinet-Sante study. J Med Internet Res2013, 15, e152.
33.
MayAMBarnesDRForouhiNGet al. Prediction of measured weight from self-reported weight was not improved after stratification by body mass index. Obesity2013, 21, E137–142.
34.
PasalichMLeeAHBurkeLet al. Accuracy of self-reported anthropometric measures in older Australian adults. Australas J Ageing2014, 33, E27–32.
35.
YoongSLCareyMLD’EsteCet al. Agreement between self-reported and measured weight and height collected in general practice patients: a prospective study. BMC Med Res Methodol2013, 13, 38.
36.
GroßschädlFHaditschBStroneggerWJ. Validity of self-reported weight and height in Austrian adults: sociodemographic determinants and consequences for the classification of BMI categories. Public Health Nutr2012, 15, 20–27.
37.
LinCJDeRooLAJacobsSRet al. Accuracy and reliability of self-reported weight and height in the Sister Study. Public Health Nutr2012, 15, 989–999.
38.
WenMKowaleski-JonesL. Sex and ethnic differences in validity of self-reported adult height, weight and body mass index. Ethn Dis2012, 22, 72–78.
39.
YongVSaitoY. How accurate are self-reported height, weight, and BMI among community-dwelling elderly Japanese? Evidence from a national population-based study. Geriatr Gerontol Int2012, 12, 247–256.
40.
Bes-RastrolloMSabateJJaceldo-SieglKet al. Validation of self-reported anthropometrics in the Adventist Health Study 2. BMC Public Health2011, 11, 213.
41.
DijkshoornHUjcic-VoortmanJKVietLet al. Ethnic variation in validity of the estimated obesity prevalence using self-reported weight and height measurements. BMC Public Health2011, 11, 408.
42.
GriebelerMLLevisSBeringerLMet al. Self-reported versus measured height and weight in Hispanic and non-Hispanic menopausal women. J Womens Health2011, 20, 599–604.
43.
HayesAJClarkePMLungTW. Change in bias in self-reported body mass index in Australia between 1995 and 2008 and the evaluation of correction equations. Popul Health Metr2011, 9, 53.
44.
IsidoroBLopeVPedraz-PingarronCet al. Validation of obesity based on self-reported data in Spanish women participants in breast cancer screening programmes. BMC Public Health2011, 11, 960.
45.
KrulAJDaanenHAChoiH. Self-reported and measured weight, height and body mass index (BMI) in Italy, the Netherlands and North America. Eur J Public Health2011, 21, 414–419.
46.
LeeDHShinAKimJet al. Validity of self-reported height and weight in a Korean population. J Epidemiol2011, 21, 30–36.
47.
LoisKKumarSWilliamsNet al. Can self-reported height and weight be relied upon?. Occup Med2011, 61, 590–592.
48.
NgSPKordaRClementsMet al. Validity of self-reported height and weight and derived body mass index in middle-aged and elderly individuals in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health2011, 35, 557–563.
49.
ParkJYMitrouPNKeoghRHet al. Effects of body size and sociodemographic characteristics on differences between self-reported and measured anthropometric data in middle-aged men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk study. Eur J Clin Nutr2011, 65, 357–367.
50.
ShieldsMConnor GorberSJanssenIet al. Bias in self-reported estimates of obesity in Canadian health surveys: an update on correction equations for adults. Health Rep2011, 22, 35–45.
51.
Van ValkengoedIGNicolaouMStronksK. Ethnic differences in discrepancies between self-reported and measured weight, height and body mass index. Eur J Public Health2011, 21, 420–423.
52.
BurtonNWBrownWDobsonA. Accuracy of body mass index estimated from self-reported height and weight in mid-aged Australian women. Aust N Z J Public Health2010, 34, 620–623.
53.
DahlAKHassingLBFranssonEIet al. Agreement between self-reported and measured height, weight and body mass index in old age: a longitudinal study with 20 years of follow-up. Age Ageing2010, 39, 445–451.
54.
FillenbaumGGKuchibhatlaMNWhitsonHEet al. Accuracy of self-reported height and weight in a community-based sample of older African Americans and whites. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci2010, 65, 1123–1129.
55.
LuccaAMouraEC. Validity and reliability of self-reported weight, height and body mass index from telephone interviews. Cad Saude Publica2010, 26, 110–122.
56.
MengHHeXZDixonD. Self-reported versus measured height and weight in the health and retirement study. J Am Geriatr Soc2010, 58, 412–413.
57.
AhluwaliaIBTessaroIRyeSet al. Self-reported and clinical measurement of three chronic disease risks among low-income women in West Virginia. J Womens Health2009, 18, 1857–1862.
58.
MerrillRMRichardsonJS. Validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2006. Prev Chronic Dis2009, 6, A121.
59.
OliveiraARamosELopesCet al. Self-reporting weight and height: misclassification effect on the risk estimates for acute myocardial infarction. Eur J Public Health2009, 19, 548–553.
60.
StommelMSchoenbornCA. Accuracy and usefulness of BMI measures based on self-reported weight and height: findings from the NHANES & NHIS 2001-2006. BMC Public Health2009, 9, 421.
61.
DanubioMEMirandaGVinciguerraMGet al. Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight: implications for obesity research among young adults. Econ Hum Biol2008, 6, 181–190.
62.
DekkersJCvan WierMFHendriksenIJet al. Accuracy of self-reported body weight, height and waist circumference in a Dutch overweight working population. BMC Med Res Methodol2008, 8, 69.
63.
ElgarFJStewartJM. Validity of self-report screening for overweight and obesity. Evidence from the Canadian Community Health Survey. Can J Public Health2008, 99, 423–427.
64.
JefferyRWFinchEALindeJAet al. Does clinical depression affect the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in obese women?. Obesity2008, 16, 473–475.
65.
LarsenJKOuwensMEngelsRCet al. Validity of self-reported weight and height and predictors of weight bias in female college students. Appetite2008, 50, 386–389.
66.
ParadisAMPerusseLGodinGet al. Validity of a self-reported measure of familial history of obesity. Nutr J2008, 7, 27.
67.
SahyounNRMaynardLMZhangXLet al. Factors associated with errors in self-reported height and weight in older adults. J Nutr Health Aging2008, 12, 108–115.
68.
Brunner HuberLR. Validity of self-reported height and weight in women of reproductive age. Matern Child Health J2007, 11, 137–144.
69.
McAdamsMAVan DamRMHuFB. Comparison of self-reported and measured BMI as correlates of disease markers in US adults. Obesity2007, 15, 188–196.
70.
NyholmMGullbergBMerloJet al. The validity of obesity based on self-reported weight and height: Implications for population studies. Obesity2007, 15, 197–208.
71.
WhiteMAMashebRMBurke-MartindaleCet al. Accuracy of self-reported weight among bariatric surgery candidates: the influence of race and weight cycling. Obesity2007, 15, 2761–2768.
72.
TaylorAWDal GrandeEGillTKet al. How valid are self-reported height and weight? A comparison between CATI self-report and clinic measurements using a large cohort study. Aust N Z J Public Health2006, 30, 238–246.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
