Health promotion constitutes a complex field of study, as it addresses
multifaceted problems and involves a range of methods and theories. Students in
the field of health promotion can find this challenging. To raise their level of
reflexivity and support learning we have developed the “context model,” which is
presented in this article. The model provides a framework for the analysis of
health-promotion initiatives, employing eight perspectives each intertwined with
the others. It is based on the assumption that health and health inequities are
contextual and that the theoretically inspired understanding of contexts is
central for health promoters. Contexts for health are seen as more than the
local setting; they are embedded in societal and global conditions—which, vice
versa, influence the local setting. A Danish community health project is used to
exemplify how the model can be used in relation to educational purposes.
DiderichsenFScheeleCELittleIG.Tackling health inequalities locally: The scandinavian
experience. Copenhagen:
University of Copenhagen,
2015, p.49.
2.
AndersenHL.Community Health - Sundhedsfremmestrategier og planlægning i
lokalsamfund. Købehavn:
Roskilde Universitet,
2015.
3.
DiderichsenFAndersenIManuelCUlighed i sundhed : årsager og indsatser: udarbejdet for
Sundhedsstyrelsen af Finn Diderichsen, Ingelise Andersen og Celie
Manuel. Købehavn:
Sundhedsstyrelsen,
2011.
4.
AndersenASHeilesenSBThe Roskilde model: Problem-oriented learning and project work,
1st ed. Heidelberg; New York; Dordrecht;
London: Springer,
2015.
5.
LivengA.Sundhedsfremme som livslang og ‘livsbred’
læreproces. In: DybbroeBLandBNielsenSB (eds) Sundhedsfremme – et kritisk perspektiv,
1st ed.Frederiksberg C:
Samfundslitteratur, 2012,
p.215.
6.
RaisioH.Health care reform planners and wicked problems.
J Health Organ Manag2009;23(5):
477–93.
7.
KreuterMWDe RosaCHowzeEHet
al. Understanding Wicked Problems: A Key to
Advancing Environmental Health Promotion. Health
Educ Behav2004;31(4):441–54.
8.
McQueenDIlonaKPotvinLet
al. Health and modernity: The role of theory in health
promotion, 1st ed. New
York: Springer,
2007.
9.
SimovskaVJensenJM.Sundhedspædagogik og sundhedsfremme: Principper og sammenhænge,
1st ed.. København:
Gad, 2012.
TonesKGreenJ.Health promotion: Planning and strategies.
London:
Sage, 2009.
12.
HøyerK.Hvad er teori, og hvordan forholder teori sig til
metode? In: VallgårdaSKochL (eds) Forskningsmetoder i
folkesundhedsvidenskab, 3rd ed.København: Munksgaard
Danmark, 2011,
pp.17–41.
13.
JöhnckeSSvendsenMNWhyteS.Løsningsmodeller: Sociale teknologier som antropologisk
arbejdsfelt In: HastrupK (ed) Viden om verden en grundbog i antropologisk
analyse., København:
Hans Reitzels Forlag, 2004,
pp.385–408.
14.
BourdieuPWacquantL.Refleksiv sociologi, 1 udgave 5.
Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels
Forlag, 1992.
15.
BourdieuP.The weight of the world : Social suffering in contemporary society.
Social Semiotics. Oxford:
Polity Press, 1999,
p.646.
16.
SkovgaardTNielsenMBDAroAR.Sundhedsstyrelsen. Evidens og forebyggelse.
Copenhagen: Danish Health
Authority, København S.,
2007.
17.
KristensenJE.Forebyggelse og sundhedsfremme i vidensamfundet. Om grænser for
evidensbaseret forebyggelse. Sundhedsstyrelsen,
Viden- og dokumentationsenheden, København,
2004.
18.
BrøggerOEikelandB.Turning to practice with action research. Vol.
5. Frankfurt am Main:
Peter Lang internationaler Verlag der
Wissenschaften, 2009.
19.
FoucaultM.Seksualitetens historie.
København: Det Lille
Forlag, 1994.
20.
FoucaultM.Questions of Method. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The foucault effect: Studies in
governmentality, Chicago, IL:
The University of Chicago Press,
1991, pp.73–87.
21.
BourdieuP.Af praktiske grunde : omkring teorien om menneskelig handlen.
København: Hans
Reitzel, 1997.
22.
FrohlichKLAbelT.Environmental justice and health practices: Understanding how
health inequities arise at the local level. Sociol
Health Illn2014;36(2):
199–212.
23.
HonnethA.Kamp om anerkendelse Sociale konflikters moralske grammatik,
1st ed. Købehavn:
Hans Reitzel,
2006.
24.
Lehn-ChristiansenS.Tværprofessionelt samarbejde i sundhedsfaglig praksis.
København:
Munksgaard,
2016.
25.
Esping-AndersenG.The three worlds of welfare capitalism.
Princeton: Princeston
University Press, 1990,
p.244.
26.
PedersenOK.Konkurrencestaten. 1st ed.
København: Hans Reitzels
Forlag, 2011.
27.
PovlsenLKarlssonLERegberSet
al. Are equity aspects communicated in Nordic public
health documents?Scand J Public Health2014;42(3):235–41.
28.
VallgårdaS.Addressing individual behaviours and living conditions: four
Nordic public health policies. Scand J Public
Health2011;39(Suppl
6):S6–10.
29.
ReinbacherGSVerwohltB.Sundhed i spændingsfeltet mellem stat, marked og borger.
Working Paper, Aalborg Universitet.
Danish Centre for Philosophy and Science
Studies, 2009,
p.21.
30.
FosseE.Different welfare states, different policies? An analysis of the
substance of national health promotion policies in countries representing
four European welfare state regimes. Int J Health
Serv2011;41(20):
255–271.
31.
WengerE.Praksisfællesskaber. Copenhagen:
Hans Reitzels Forlag,
1998.
32.
LaverackGLabonteR.A planning framework for community empowerment goals within
health promotion. Health Policy Plan2000;15(3):255–62.
33.
LatourB.Science in action. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press,
1987.
34.
MolA.The logic of care. New York:
Routledge,
2008.
35.
BaumanZ.Globalization, the human consequences.
Cambridge: Polity
Press, 1998.
36.
AlmlundPHolmJ.Post Rio and Ottawa Policy – Communication for
Deliberation. J Transdiscip Environ Stud2014;14(2):13.
37.
KickbuschI.A game change in global health : The best is yet to
come. Public Health Rev2013;35(1):1–20.
38.
KjærgårdBLandBPedersenKB.Health and sustainability. Health Promot
Int2013;29(3):558–568.
