Aim: The aim of this study was to develop and to validate the self-administered Falun health instrument. An additional aim was to test its applicability in measuring people’s lifestyles linked to health. Methods: In 2002, an instrument was constructed containing questions regarding the hazardous use of alcohol, tobacco, unhealthy diets and insufficient physical activity. A pilot study using the instrument was assessed between 2002 and 2006. In Sweden, it was further expanded and tested during the years 2004–2014 among a total of 1295 people. Results: Face validity was evaluated among colleagues and experts for clarity and completeness resulting in minor adjustments of some questions. With the test–retest method, the self-administered Falun health questionnaire showed a positive and high reproducibility and high compliance. Cronbach’s alpha showed a high level of consistency (average 0.86). Factor analysis demonstrated the choice of questions correlated highly to the measured lifestyle. Conclusions: This study showed that the self-administered Falun health questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument, useful for detecting individuals at risk of developing diseases that are related to individual choice of lifestyle.
The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care [Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (SBU)]. Disease prevention in the heart and vessels through population-based programmes: A systematic literature review [Att förebygga sjukdom i hjärta och kärl genom befokningsinriktade program: en systematisk litteraturöversikt]. Report no. 134, 1997. Stockholm: SBU.
The Swedish Society for Physical Activity [Yrkesföreningen för fysisk aktivitet (YFA)]. FYSS Fysisk aktivitet i sjukdomsprevention och sjukdomsbehandling [Physical activity in the prevention and treatment of disease], 2008, http://fyss.se/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/FYSS-2008-hela-boken.pdf (accessed 8 September 2017).
4.
The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care [Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (SBU)]. Metoder att främja fysisk aktivitet. En systematisk litteraturöversikt [Methods for promoting physical activity. A systematic literature review]. Report no. 181, 2007Stockholm: SBU, http://www.sbu.se/contentassets/c2cb6581355047b48367f19e1c9e3700/fysisk_aktivitet.pdf (accessed 8 September 2017).
5.
Swedish Government. Public health goals [Mål för folkhälsan]. Regeringens proposition 2002;03:35.
6.
The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care [Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (SBU)]. Utvärdering av metoder i hälso- och sjukvården [Evaluation of methods in health care systems]. Falköping: Erlanders Sverige AB, 2013.
PencheonDGuestCMeltzerDet al. Oxford handbook of public health practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
9.
WeinehallLHellstenGBomanKet al. Prevention of cardiovascular disease in Sweden: The Norsjo community intervention programme – Motives, methods and intervention components. Scand J Public Health2001;56:13–20.
10.
Dal GrandeEFullertonSTaylorAW. Reliability of self-reported health risk factors and chronic conditions questions collected using the telephone in South Australia, Australia. BMC Med Res Methodol2012;12:108.
11.
ZajacovaADowdJB.Reliability of self-rated health in US adults. Am J Epidemiol2011;174:977–983.
The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care [Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (SBU)]. Disease prevention in the heart and vessels through population-based programmes: A systematic literature review [Att förebygga sjukdom i hjärta och kärl genom befolkninginriktade program: en systematisk litteraturstudie]. Report no. 134, 1997. Stockholm: SBU.
16.
BlairSNCollingwoodTR.Health promotion for educators: Impact on health behaviors, satisfaction and well-being. Am J Public Health1984;74:147–149.
17.
GlanzKRimerBKViswanathK.Health behavior and health education. Theory, research, and practice. 4th ed.San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass, 2008.
18.
HartEBondM.Action research and social care. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995.
19.
WeinehallLOhgrenBPerssonMet al. High remaining risk in poorly treated hypertension: The ’rule of halves’ still exists. J Hypertens2002;20:2081–2088.
20.
SobalJ.Physicians’ beliefs in 25 health promoting behaviors. Am J Public Health1985;75:1427–1428.
21.
NordinSMillqvistELöwhagenOet al. The chemical sensitivity scale: Psychometric properties and comparison with the noise sensitivity scale. J Environ Psychol2003;23:359–367.
22.
PiccinelliMTEBortolomasiMPiasereOet al. Efficacy of the alcohol use disorders identification test as a screening tool for hazardous alcohol intake and related disorders in primary care: A validity study. BMJ1997;314:420–424.
23.
EikelenboomNSmeeleIFaberMet al. Validation of Self-Management Screening (SeMaS), a tool to facilitate personalised counselling and support of patients with chronic diseases. BMC Fam Pract2015;16:165.
24.
WallstonKAWallstonBSDeVellisR.Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales. Health Educ Monogr1978;6:160–170.
25.
SalenBASpangfortEVNygrenALet al. The Disability Rating Index: An instrument for the assessment of disability in clinical settings. J Clin Epidemiol1994;47:1423–1435.
26.
TerluinBvan MarwijkHWAderHJet al. The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ): A validation study of a multidimensional self-report questionnaire to assess distress, depression, anxiety and somatization. BMC Psychiatry2006;6:34.
27.
RademakersJNJvan der HoekLHeijmansMet al. Measuring patient activation in the Netherlands: Translation and validation of the American short form Patient Activation Measure (PAM13). BMC Public Health2012;12:577.
28.
MayfieldDMcLeodGHallP.The CAGE questionnaire. Validation of a new alcoholism screening test. Am J Psychiatry1974;131:1121–1123.
29.
Magruder-HabibKHarrisKEFrakerGG.Validation of the Veterans Alcoholism Screening Test. J Stud Alcohol Drugs1982;43:910–926.
30.
FulkersonJALytleLStoryMet al. Development and validation of a screening instrument to assess the types and quality of foods served at home meals. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2012;9:10.
31.
YarochALToozeJThompsonFEet al. Evaluation of three short dietary instruments to assess fruit and vegetable intake: The National Cancer Institute’s Food Attitudes and Behaviors (FAB) Survey. J Acad Nutr Diet2012;112:1570–1577.
32.
BeckerW.Vi äter nyttigare men har blivit tyngre [We eat healthier food but have gained weight]. Vår Föda [Our Diet] 1999;51:3–7.
33.
BeckerW.Svenskarna äter nyttigare - allt flera väljer grönt. The Swedes eat healthier food - more people choose green. Vår Föda [Our Diet] 1999;51:24–27.
34.
SoxHC.Preventive health service in adults. N Engl J Med1994;330:1589–1595.
JohanssonLThelleDSSolvollKet al. Healthy dietary habits in relation to social determinants and lifestyle factors. Br J Nutr1999;81:211–220.
39.
MensinkRPKatanMB.Effect of a diet enriched with monounsaturated or polyunsaturated fatty acids on levels of low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in healthy women and men. N Engl J Med1989;17;321:436–441.
40.
BjörckIGranfeldtYLiljebergHet al. Food properties affecting the digestion and absorption of carbohydrates. Am J Clin Nutr1994;59:699–705.
41.
JenkinsDJWoleverTMVuksanVet al. Nibbling versus gorging: Metabolic advantages of increased meal frequency. N Engl J Med1989;321:929–934.
42.
JenkinsDJOcanaAJenkinsALet al. Metabolic advantages of spreading the nutrient load: Effects of increased meals frequency in non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr1992;55:461–467.
SingerEFrankellMRGlassmanMB.The effect of interviewer characteristics and expectations on response. Public Opin Q1983;47:68–83.
45.
FieldA.Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: and sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll.4th ed. London: Sage, 2013.
46.
HartmanJ.Vetenskapligt tänkande: Från kunskapsteori till metodteori [Scientific thinking: From knowledge theory to method theory]. Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2004.
47.
Wilde LarssonBLarssonG. Development of a short form of the Quality from the Patient’s Perspective (QPP) questionnaire. J Clin Nurs2002;11:681–687.
48.
SørensenJDavidsenMGudexCet al. Danish EQ-5D population norms. Scand J Public Health2009;37:467–474.
49.
GlasbergA-LErikssonSDahlqvistVet al. Development and initial validation of the Stress of Conscience Questionnaire. Nurs Ethics2006;13:633–648.
50.
NilssonJJohanssonEEgmarACet al. Development and validation of a new tool measuring nurses’ self-reported professional competence – The nurse professional competence (NPC) Scale. Nurse Educ Today2014;34:574–580.
51.
The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care [Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering (SBU)]. Utvärdering av metoder i hälso- och sjukvården [Evaluation of methods in health care systems]. Falköping: Erlanders Sverige AB, 2013.
52.
SingerEFrankelMRGlassmanMB.The effect of interviewer characteristics and expectations on response. Public Opin Q1983;47:68–83.
ThomssonHMenckelE.Vad är hälsobefrämjande arbetsplatser? – ett svenskt perspektiv [What are health promotion work places? – A Swedish perspective]. Ljungby: JOMA torroffset, 1997.
