Acceptability of a vocational advice service for patients consulting in primary care with musculoskeletal pain: A qualitative exploration of the experiences of general practitioners,vocational advisers and patients

Abstract

Aims: Using qualitative interviews, this study explored the experiences of GPs, vocational advisers and patients towards a new vocational advice (VA) service in primary care. Methods: This study was nested within the Study of Work and Pain (SWAP) cluster randomised controlled trial. The SWAP trial located a VA service within three general practices in Staffordshire. Interviews took place with 10 GPs 12 months after the introduction of the VA service, four vocational advisers whilst the VA service was running and 20 patients on discharge from the VA service. The data were analysed using the constant comparative method, which is a variation of grounded theory. Results: The key factors determining the acceptability and perceived effectiveness of the VA service from the perspective of the three groups of stakeholders were (1) the timing of referrals to the VA, (2) the perceived lack of patient demand for the service and (3) role uncertainty experienced by VAs. Conclusions: Early vocational intervention may not be appropriate for all musculoskeletal patients with work difficulties. Indeed, many patients felt they did not require the support of a VA, either because they had self-limiting work difficulties and/or already had support mechanisms in place to return to work. Future VA interventions may be better implemented in a targeted way so that appropriate patients are identified with characteristics which can best be addressed by the VA service.

Keywords

Vocational rehabilitation qualitative research primary care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lewis

Wynne-Jones

Barton

et al . (2015) Should general practitioners issue a sick certificate to employees who consult for low back pain in primary care? An assessment of clinical outcomes and cost utility. J Occup Rehabil 2015;25:577–588.

Health and Safety Executive. Musculoskeletal disorders in Great Britain 2014, www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/ (accessed 4 March 2017).

Varekamp

Verbeek

JHAM

van Dijk

FJH

. How can we help employees with chronic diseases to stay at work? A review of interventions aimed at job retention and based on an empowerment perspective. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2006;80:87–97.

Wasiak

Young

Roessler

et al . Measuring return to work. J Occup Rehabil 2007;17:766–781.

Young

Roessler

Wasiak

et al . A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15:557–568.

Black

Review of the health of Britain’s working age population: Working for a healthier tomorrow. London: TSO, 2008.

Fit For Work Europe, www.fitforworkeurope.eu (accessed 19 February 2017).

Waddell

Burton

Kendall

NAS.

Vocational rehabilitation – what works, for whom, and when? (Report for the Vocational Rehabilitation Task Group). TSO. London. ISBN 9780117038615. (2008).

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Workplace health: long-term sickness and incapacity for work. NICE Public Health Guidance 19. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2009.

10.

Department for Work and Pensions. Developing a framework for vocational rehabilitation: qualitative research, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130128102031/http://statistics.dwp.gov.uk/asd/asd5/report_abstracts/rr_abstracts/rra_224.asp (2004, accessed 4 March 2017).

11.

Craig

Dieppe

Macintyre

et al . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2008;337:a1655.

12.

Bishop

Wynne-Jones

Lawton

et al . Rationale, design and methods of the Study of Work and Pain (SWAP): a cluster randomised controlled trial testing the addition of a vocational advice service to best current primary care for patients with musculoskeletal pain (ISRCTN 52269669). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:232.

13.

Strauss

Corbin

Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.

14.

van der Klink

JJL

Blonk

RWB

Schene

et al . Reducing long term sickness absence by an activating intervention in adjustment disorders: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Occup Environ Med 2003;60:429–437.

15.

Carroll

Rick

Pilgrim

et al . Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:607–621.

16.

Pullon

McKinley

Stubbe

et al . Patients and health professionals perceptions of teamwork in primary care. J Prim Health Care 2011;3:128–135.

17.

May

Finch

Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of Normalization Process Theory. Sociology 2009;43:535–554.

18.

Pransky

Shaw

Loisel

et al . Development and validation of competencies for return to work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil 2010;20:41–48.

19.

Blakeman

Chew-Graham

Reeves

et al . The Quality and Outcomes Framework and self-management dialogue in primary care consultations: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2011;61:e666–673.

20.

Pransky

Shaw

Loisel

et al . Development and validation of competencies for return to work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil 2010;20:41–48.

21.

Gardner

Pransky

Shaw

et al . Researcher perspectives on competencies of return-to-work coordinators. Disabil Rehabil 2010;32:72–78.

22.

Morrison

Work, fit notes and occupational health. Br J Gen Pract 2010;60:715–716.

23.

Rannard

Gabbay

Sen

et al . Feasibility trial of GP and case-managed support for workplace sickness absence. Prim Health Care Res Devel 2014;15:252–261.

24.

Coutu

Baril

Durand

et al . Health and illness representations of workers with a musculoskeletal disorder-related work disability during work rehabilitation: a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil 2011;21:591–600.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB