Social inequalities in health have been categorised as a human-rights issue that requires action. Unfortunately, these inequalities are on the rise in many countries, including welfare states. Various theories have been offered to explain the persistence (and rise) of these inequalities over time, including the social determinants of health and fundamental cause theory. Interestingly, the rise of modern social inequalities in health has come at a time of great technological innovation. This article addresses whether these technological innovations are significantly influencing the persistence of modern social inequalities in health. A theoretical argument is offered for this potential connection and is discussed alongside the typical social determinants of health perspective and the increasingly popular fundamental cause perspective. This is followed by a proposed research agenda for further investigation of the potential role that technological innovations may play in influencing social inequalities in health.
BeckfieldJBambraCEikemoTAet alAn institutional theory of welfare state effects on the distribution of population health. Soc Theory Health2015;14:227–244.
3.
MackenbachJP. The persistence of health inequalities in modern welfare states: the explanation of a paradox. Soc Sci Med2012;75:761–769.
4.
MarmotMFrielSBellRet alClosing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet2008;372:1661–1669.
5.
WilkinsonRGMarmotMG. Social determinants of health: the solid facts. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2003.
6.
MichaelM. The status syndrome: how social standing affects our health and longevity. London: Bloomsbury, 2004.
7.
BravemanPGruskinS. Defining equity in health. J Epidemiol Community Health2003;57:254–258.
8.
KawachiISubramanianSAlmeida-FilhoN. A glossary for health inequalities. J Epidemiol Community Health2002;56:647–652.
9.
WhiteheadM. A typology of actions to tackle social inequalities in health. J Epidemiol Community Health2007;61:473–478.
10.
MarmotM. The health gap: the challenge of an unequal world. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.
11.
RogersEM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press, 2003.
12.
MathesonADewKCummingJ. Complexity, evaluation and the effectiveness of community-based interventions to reduce health inequalities. Health Promot J Austr2009;20:221–226.
13.
World Health Organization. Ottawa charter for health promotion. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1986.
14.
PhelanJCLinkBG. Controlling disease and creating disparities: a fundamental cause perspective. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci2005;60:S27–S33.
15.
GrahamH. Social determinants and their unequal distribution: clarifying policy understandings. Milbank Q2004;82:101–124.
16.
MarmotMWilkinsonR. Social determinants of health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
17.
PhelanJCLinkBG. Fundamental cause theory. In: CockerhamWC (ed) Medical sociology on the move. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013, pp.105–125.
18.
World Health Organization. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health: Commission on Social Determinants of Health final report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2008.
19.
MittelmarkMB. Unintended effects in settings-based health promotion. Scand J Public Health2014;42:17–24.
20.
PhelanJCLinkBGTehranifarP. Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities theory, evidence, and policy implications. J Health Soc Behav2010;51:S28–S40.
21.
WoolfSHJohnsonREPhillipsRLJret alGiving everyone the health of the educated: an examination of whether social change would save more lives than medical advances. Am J Public Health2007;97:679–683.
22.
PiotP. Innovation and technology for global public health. Global Public Health2012;7:S46–S53.
23.
CasperMJMorrisonDR. Medical sociology and technology critical engagements. J Health Soc Behav2010;51:S120–S132.
24.
GoldmanDPLakdawallaDN. A theory of health disparities and medical technology. Contrib Econ Anal Policy2005;4:1–32.
25.
FreeseJLutfeyK. Fundamental causality: challenges of an animating concept for medical sociology. In: PescosolidoBAMartinJKMcLeodJet al (eds) Handbook of the sociology of health, illness, and healing. New York: Springer, 2011, pp.67–81.
26.
LutfeyKFreeseJ. Toward some fundamentals of fundamental causality: socioeconomic status and health in the routine clinic visit for diabetes1. Am J Sociol2005;110:1326–1372.
27.
HallBHKhanB. Adoption of new technology. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2003.
28.
KordaRJClementsMSDixonJ. Socioeconomic inequalities in the diffusion of health technology: uptake of coronary procedures as an example. Soc Sci Med2011;72:224–229.
29.
LoureiroSSimõesBAragãoEet alDiffusion of medical technology and equity in health in brazil: an exploratory analysis. Eur J Devel Res2007;19:66–80.
30.
ChangVWLauderdaleDS. Fundamental cause theory, technological innovation, and health disparities: the case of cholesterol in the era of statins. J Health Soc Behav2009;50:245–260.
31.
GliedSLleras-MuneyA. Technological innovation and inequality in health. Demography2008;45:741–761.
32.
SavardJ. Personalised medicine: a critique on the future of health care. J Bioeth Inq2013;10:197–203.
33.
LuptonD. Health promotion in the digital era: a critical commentary. Health Promot Int2015;30:174–183.
34.
LuptonD. The digitally engaged patient: self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Soc Theory Health2013;11:256–270.
