Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to examine the factor structure, model-based reliability, measurement invariance and concurrent validity of the five-item version of the Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in Norwegian adolescents. Methods: An initial pilot study was carried out using a sample of 77 fifteen year olds. For the main analyses, a sample of 2140 Norwegian adolescents was used who participated in the cross-sectional Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) study. All participants were asked to complete a questionnaire. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses found support for the one-factor structure of the five-item version of the MAAS. Acceptable model fit was found in both the pilot sample (χ²=6.48, df=5, p=0.26; root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA]=0.06; comparative fit index [CFI]=0.99; standardised root mean square residual [SRMR]=0.03) and the HBSC sample (χ²=27.1, df=4, p<0.001; RMSEA=0.05; CFI=0.99; SRMR=0.01). The model-based reliability of the scale was good (ω=0.84 and ω=0.81, respectively). Scalar measurement invariance was established for sex, age and material affluence. Finally, the five-item MAAS displayed concurrent validity through moderate negative associations with health complaints (r=−0.44; p<0.001) and school stress (b=−0.44, p<0.001), and a positive moderate correlation with life satisfaction (r=0.26; p<0.001). Conclusions: The five-item version of the MAAS is an adequate measure of mindfulness in Norwegian adolescents. Due to the brief nature of the scale, it can easily be included in epidemiological and clinical studies with an interest for trait mindfulness. The five-item MAAS may therefore have great potential to facilitate more knowledge about the role of mindfulness in adolescent health.

Keywords

Awareness attention assessment Norway young people

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bishop

Lau

Shapiro

. Mindfulness: a proposed operational definition. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2004;11:230–241.

Demarzo

Montero-Marin

Cuijpers

. The efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions in primary care: a meta-analytic review. Ann Fam Med 2015;13:573–582.

Chiesa

Serretti

Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management in healthy people: a review and meta-analysis. J Altern Complement Med 2009;15:593–600.

Piet

Hougaard

The effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for prevention of relapse in recurrent major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2011;31:1032–1040.

Vollestad

Nielsen

GH.

Mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions for anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Psychol 2012;51:239–260.

Holzel

Lazar

Gard

. How does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspect Psychol Sci 2011;6:537–559.

Davidson

Grigorenko

Boivin

. A focus on adolescence to reduce neurological, mental health and substance-use disability. Nature 2015;527:S161–166.

Farley

Kim-Spoon

The development of adolescent self-regulation: reviewing the role of parent, peer, friend, and romantic relationships. J Adolesc 2014;37:433–440.

Zenner

Herrnleben-Kurz

Walach

Mindfulness-based interventions in schools – a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol 2014;5:603.

10.

Tan

LB.

A critical review of adolescent mindfulness-based programmes. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2016;21:193–207.

11.

Brown

Ryan

RM.

The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003;84:822–848.

12.

Heath

Carsley

De Riggi

. The relationship between mindfulness, depressive symptoms, and non-suicidal self-injury amongst adolescents. Arch Suicide Res 2016;20:635–649.

13.

Black

Sussman

Johnson

. Trait mindfulness helps shield decision-making from translating into health-risk behavior. J Adolesc Health 2012;51:588–592.

14.

Brown

Ryan

RM.

Perils and promise in defining and measuring mindfulness: observations from experience. Clin Psychol Sci Pract 2004;11:242–248.

15.

Brown

West

Loverich

. Assessing adolescent mindfulness: validation of an adapted Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in adolescent normative and psychiatric populations. Psychol Assess 2011;23:1023–1033.

16.

Brown

Ryan

Loverich

. Out of the armchair and into the streets: measuring mindfulness advances knowledge and improves interventions: reply to Grossman (2011). Psychol Assess 2011;23:1041–1046.

17.

Roberts

Freeman

Samdal

. The Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: methodological developments and current tensions. Int J Public Health 2009;54:140–150.

18.

Van Dam

Earleywine

Borders

Measuring mindfulness? An item response theory analysis of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale. Pers Individ Dif 2010;49:805–810.

19.

Black

Sussman

Johnson

. Psychometric assessment of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) among Chinese adolescents. Assessment 2012;19:42–52.

20.

Osman

Lamis

Bagge

. The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale: further examination of dimensionality, reliability, and concurrent validity estimates. J Pers Assess 2016; 98: 189–199.

21.

Goh

Marais

Ireland

MJ.

A Rasch model analysis of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale. Assessment. Epub ahead of print 13 October 2015.

22.

Grossman

On measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research. J Psychosom Res 2008;64:405–408.

23.

Grossman

. Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology’s (re)invention of mindfulness: comment on Brown et al. (2011). Psychol Assess 2011;23:1034–1040; discussion 41–46.

24.

Christopher

Charoensuk

Gilbert

. Mindfulness in Thailand and the United States: a case of apples versus oranges? J Clin Psychol 2009;65:590–612.

25.

Verplanken

Friborg

Wang

. Mental habits: metacognitive reflection on negative self-thinking. J Pers Soc Psychol 2007;92:526–541.

26.

Ravens-Sieberer

Erhart

Torsheim

. An international scoring system for self-reported health complaints in adolescents. Eur J Public Health 2008;18:294–299.

27.

Haugland

Wold

Subjective health complaints in adolescence – reliability and validity of survey methods. J Adolesc 2001;24611–624.

28.

Cantril

The pattern of human concerns. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1966.

29.

Levin

Currie

Reliability and validity of an adapted version of the cantril ladder for use with adolescent samples. Soc Indic Res 2014;119:1047–1063.

30.

Currie

Zanotti

Morgan

. Social determinants of health and well-being among young people. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2009/2010 survey. Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, No 6. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2012.

31.

Hartley

JEK

Levin

Currie

A new version of the HBSC Family Affluence Scale – FAS III: Scottish qualitative findings from the International FAS Development Study. Child Indic Res 2016;9:233.

Psychometric properties of the five-item version of the Mindful Awareness Attention Scale (MAAS) in Norwegian adolescents

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References