National and regional trends in equity within specialised health care in Finland in 2002

Abstract

Aims: Equity is an important goal of health-care systems. Nevertheless, previous research indicates that health-care systems do not deliver health services equitably and that socio-economic differences in both health and health-care use may even be increasing. The aim of this study was to investigate national and regional time trends in equity within specialised health care in Finland. Methods: The data used in the study were obtained from the Hospital Discharge Register covering all hospital admissions in Finland from 2002 to 2010 for patients having utilised specialised non-psychiatric inpatient care. Income data were individually linked to these register data. Equity was measured in terms of concentration index at hospital district level. Results: Concentration indices across hospital districts and years were negative, suggesting specialised inpatient care to be distributed pro poor. Overall, the concentration indices remained fairly stable during the study period. However, a drop in the indices appeared in all hospital districts between 2005 and 2008, and a reverse development was found after 2008. In internal medicine departments of the hospital districts, the distribution of the indices was more pro poor compared to surgery but the trends within both specialties were similar to those within specialised care in general. Conclusions: The pro-poor distribution of concentration indices is consistent with morbidity differences. The introduction of the waiting time guarantee in 2005, which brought along an increment in resources, as well as the launch of new regulations and financial incentives, probably increased access to specialised health care among low-income patients temporarily.

Keywords

Equity specialist hospital use health services research register-based study

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hetemaa

Keskimäki

Manderbacka

. How did the recent increase in the supply of coronary operations in Finland affect socio-economic and gender equity in their use? J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:178–185.

Manderbacka

Arffman

Leyland

. Change and persistence in healthcare inequities: access to elective surgery in Finland in 1992–2003. Scand J Public Health 2009;37:131–138.

Ancona

Agabiti

Forastiere

. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery: socioeconomic inequalities in access and in 30 day mortality. A population-based study in Rome, Italy. J Epidemiol Community Health 2000;54:930–935.

Dixon

Shaw

Ebrahim

. Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need. Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:825–830.

Haglund

Koster

Nilsson

. Inequality in access to coronary revascularization in Sweden. Scand Cardiovasc J 2004;38:334–339.

Lumme

Sund

Leyland

. Socioeconomic equity in amenable mortality in Finland 1992–2008. Soc Sci Med 2012;75:905–913.

Korda

Butler

Clements

. Differential impacts of health care in Australia: trend analysis of socioeconomic inequalities in avoidable mortality. Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:157–165.

Keskimäki

. How did Finland’s economic recession in the early 1990s affect socio-economic equity in the use of hospital care? Soc Sci Med 2003;56:1517–1530.

Manderbacka

Arffman

Keskimaki

. Has socioeconomic equity increased in somatic specialist care: a register-based cohort study from Finland in 1995–2010. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:430.

10.

OECD. Health at a glance: Europe 2012. Paris: OECD, 2012.

11.

Häkkinen

Nguyen

. Rikas käy edelleen lääkärissä köyhää enemmän. Optimi 2010;2. http://www.julkari.fi/handle/10024/114521

12.

OECD. OECD framework for statistics on the distribution of household income, consumption and wealth. Paris: OECD, 2013.

13.

Kakwani

Wagstaff

van Doorslaer

. Socioeconomic inequalities in health: measurement, computation, and statistical inference. J Econometrics 1997;77:87–103.

14.

van Doorslaer

Masseria

Koolman

for the OECD Health Equity Research Group. Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. CMAJ 2006;174:177–183.

15.

Tarkiainen

Martikainen

Laaksonen

. Trends in life expectancy by income from 1988 to 2007: decomposition by age and cause of death. J Epidemiol Community Health 2011;66:573–578.

16.

Jonsson

Häkkinen

Järvelin

. Chapter 7 – Finland. In: Siciliani

Borowitz

Moran

(eds) Waiting times policies in the health sector: what works? OECD Health Policy Studies. Paris: OECD, 2013.

17.

Pekurinen

Mikkola

Tuominen

. Hoitotakuun talous – hoitotakuun vaikutus terveydenhuollon menoihin, toimintaan ja sairausvakuutuskorvauksiin. [Economics of the waiting time guarantee – impact of the waiting time guarantee on health care expenditure, performance and health insurance benefits.] Reports 5. Helsinki: STAKES, 2008.

18.

Sund

. Quality of the Finnish hospital discharge register: a systematic review. Scand J Public Health 2012;40:505–515.

19.

Mackenbach

Stirbu

Roskam

. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2468–2481.

20.

Koskinen

Lundqvist

Ristiluoma

(eds) Terveys, toimintakyky ja hyvinvointi Suomessa 2011 [Health, functional capacity and wellbeing in Finland in 2011]. Report 68/2012. Tampere: National Institute for Health and Welfare, 2012.

National and regional trends in equity within specialised health care in Finland in 2002–2010

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References