Why and for what are clinical trials the gold standard?

Abstract

The epistemological basis of clinical trials and evidence-based medicine is investigated. Clinical trials are directly action-guiding experiments on treatment effects. This is the reason why well-performed clinical trials take precedence over all other types of studies as far as treatment effects are concerned. The efficiency of public health interventions can be studied with directly action-guiding experiments that have the same strong epistemic justification as clinical trials. However, in order to assess the causality of diseases, information from several types of studies will have to be combined. Here, no single type of studies has priority over all the others. Therefore, evidence hierarchies are less helpful in studies of causality than they are in investigations of the effects of treatments or interventions.

Keywords

Action-guiding experiment clinical trial epistemic experiment evidence-based medicine public health

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hansson

. Experiments before science – what science learned from technological experiments. In: Hansson

(ed) The role of technology in science. Philosophical perspectives 2014. Dordrecht: Springer, in press.

Bray

. Ancient food for thought. Nature 2000;408:145–6.

Earls

. The character of Inca and Andean agriculture. Lima: Departamento de Ciencias Sociales Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perô. Available at: http://macareo.pucp.edu.pe/~jearls/documentosPDF/theCharacter.PDF (1998, 29 July 2013).

Chandler

. The indigenous knowledge of ecological processes among peasants in the People’s Republic of China. Agric Human Values 1991;8:59–66.

Johnson

. Individuality and experimentation in traditional agriculture. Hum Ecol 1972;1:149–59.

Richards

. Farmers also experiment: a neglected intellectual resource in African science. Discov Innovat 1989;1:19–25.

Henderson

Challis

O’Hara

. Experiment and innovation: early Islamic industry at al-Raqqa, Syria. Antiquity 2005;79:130–45.

Henderson

McLoughlin

McPhail

. Radical changes in Islamic glass technology: evidence for conservatism and experimentation with new glass recipes from early and middle Islamic Raqqa, Syria. Archaeometry 2004;46:439–68.

Malina

. Archaeology and experiment. Nor Archaeol Rev 1983;16:69–78.

10.

Moropoulou

Bakolas

Anagnostopoulou

. Composite materials in ancient structures. Cement Concrete Comp 2005;27:295–300.

11.

Mark

. The structural analysis of Gothic cathedrals. Sci Am 1972;227:90–9.

12.

Mark

. Structural experimentation in Gothic architecture: large-scale experimentation brought Gothic cathedrals to a level of technical elegance unsurpassed until the last century. Am Sci 1978;66:542–50.

13.

Wolfe

Mark

. Gothic cathedral buttressing: the experiment at Bourges and its influence. J Soc Archit Hist 1974;33:17–26.

14.

McGinnis

. Scientific methodologies in medieval Islam. J Hist Philos 2003;41:307–27.

15.

Collier

. Legumes, lemons and streptomycin: a short history of the clinical trial. Can Med Assoc J 2009;180:23–4.

16.

Cooper

. Trial by accident: tort law, industrial risks and the history of medical experiment. J Cult Econ 2011;4:81–96.

17.

Doll

. Controlled trials: the 1948 watershed. BMJ 1998;317:1217.

18.

Medical Research Council. Streptomycin in Tuberculosis Trials Committee. Streptomycin treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis. Brit Med J 1948;ii:769–82.

19.

Hanson

. Patterns of discovery: an inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.

20.

Dietl

. Der Aderlass in der Lungenentzündung. Wien: Kaulfuss Witwe, Prandel & Comp. 1849.

21.

Kucharz

. The life and achievements of Joseph Dietl. Clio Medica 1981;16:25–35.

22.

Williams

DDR

Garner

. The case against “the evidence”: a different perspective on evidence-based medicine. Brit J Psychiat 2002;180:8–12.