Perceived gender inequality in the couple relationship and musculoskeletal pain in middle-aged women and men

Abstract

Aims: Musculoskeletal pain is a major health problem, especially in women, and is partially determined by psychosocial factors. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether gender inequality in the couple relationship was related to musculoskeletal pain. Methods: Participants (n=721; 364 women and 357 men) were all individuals living in a couple relationship in the Northern Swedish Cohort, a 26-year Swedish cohort study. Self-administered questionnaire data at age 42 years comprised perceived gender inequality in the couple relationship and musculoskeletal pain (in three locations, summarised into one score and median-split), concurrent demographic factors, psychological distress, and previous musculoskeletal pain at age 30 years. Associations were examined using logistic regression. Results: Gender inequality was positively associated with symptoms of musculoskeletal pain in the total sample, remaining significant after addition of possible confounders and of previous musculoskeletal pain. Separate adjustment for concurrent psychological distress attenuated the association but not below significance. The association was present and of comparable strength in both women and men. Conclusions: Gender inequality in the couple relationship might contribute to the experience of musculoskeletal pain in both women and men. The results highlight the potential adverse bodily consequences of living in unequal relationships.

Keywords

Cohort study gender equality musculoskeletal pain social determinants of health

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

National Board of Health and Welfare. The national public health report. Västerås: National Board of Health and Welfare, 2009.

Gatchel

Peng

Peters

. The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull 2007;4:581–624.

Vrancenau

Barsky

Ring

. Psychosocial aspects of disabling musculoskeletal pain. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;8:2014–8.

Tunks

Crook

Weir

. Epidemiology of chronic pain with psychological comorbidity: prevalence, risk, course, and prognosis. Can J Psychiatry 2008;4:224–34.

Haukka

Leino-Arjas

Ojajärvi

. Mental stress and psychosocial factors at work in relation to multiple-site musculoskeletal pain: a longitudinal study of kitchen workers. Eur J Pain 2011;4:432–8.

Krantz

Berntsson

Lundberg

. Total workload, work stress, and perceived symptoms in Swedish male and female white-collar employees. Eur J Public Health 2005;2:209–14.

Hall

. Double exposure: the combined impact of the home and work environments on psychosomatic strain in Swedish women and men. Int J Health Serv 1992;2:239–60.

Josephson

Ahlberg

Härenstam

. Paid and unpaid work, and its relation to low back and neck/shoulder disorders among women. Women Health 2003;2:17–30.

Ahlgren

Malmgren Olsson

. Gender analysis of musculoskeletal disorders and emotional exhaustion: interactive effects from physical and psychosocial work exposures and engagement in domestic work. Ergonomics 2012;2:212–28.

10.

Staland-Nyman

Alexandersson

Hensing

. Associations between strain in domestic work and self-rated health: a study on employed women in Sweden. Scand J Public Health 2008;1:21–7.

11.

Chandola

Kuper

Singh-Manoux

. The effect of control at home on CHD events in the Whitehall II study: gender differences in psychosocial domestic pathways to social inequalities in CHD. Soc Sci Med 2004;8:1501–9.

12.

Griffin

Fuhrer

Stansfeld

. The importance of low control at work and home on depression and anxiety: do these effects vary by gender and social class? Soc Sci Med 2002;5:783–98.

13.

Bird

. Gender, household labor, and psychological distress: the impact of the amount and division of housework. J Health Soc Behav 1999;1:32–45.

14.

Glass

Fujimoto

. Housework, paid work, and depression among husband and wives. J Health Soc Behav 1994;2:179–91.

15.

De Vogli

Ferrie

Chandola

. Unfairness and health: evidence from the Whitehall II Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;6:513–18.

16.

Chen

Subramanian

Acevedo-Garcia

. Women’s status and depressive symptoms: a multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med 2005;1:49–60.

17.

Kawachi

Kennedy

Gupta

. Women’s status and the health of women and men: a view from the States. Soc Sci Med 1999;1:21–32.

18.

Backhans

Lundberg

Månsdotter

. Does increased gender equality lead to a convergence of health outcomes for men and women? A study of Swedish municipalities. Soc Sci Med 2007;9:1892–903.

19.

Harryson

Novo

Hammarström

. Is gender inequality in the domestic sphere associated with psychological distress among women and men? Results from the Northern Swedish Cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health 2012;3:271–6.

20.

Hammarstrom

Janlert

. Cohort profile: the Northern Swedish Cohort. Int J Epidemiol 2012;41:1545–52.

21.

Statistics Sweden. Swedish socioeconomic classification. Reports on statistical co-ordination 1982:4. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden, 1984.

22.

Andrzejewski

Kassolik

Brzozowski

. The influence of age and physical activity on the pressure sensitivity of soft tissues of the musculoskeletal system. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2010;4:382–90.

23.

Williams

Spector

MacGregor

. Pain reporting at different body sites is explained by a single underlying genetic factor. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;9:1753–5.

24.

Khatun

Ahlgren

Hammarström

. The influence of factors identified in adolescence and early adulthood on social class inequities of musculoskeletal disorders at age 30: a prospective population-based cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 2004;6:1353–60.

25.

Silman

Ferry

Papageorgiou

. Number of children as a risk factor for low back pain in men and women. Arthritis Rheum 1995;9:1232–5.

26.

Floderus

Hagman

Aronsson

. Work status, work hours and health in women with and without children. Occup Environ Med 2009;10:704–10.

27.

Sörlin

Lindholm

. Gender equality in couples and self-rated health – A survey study evaluating measurements of gender equality and its impact on health. Int J Equity Health 2011;1:37.