Background: Previous research has found a positive association between health-behaviour and health. Only a few longitudinal studies have been performed, and as far as we found, none have followed a cohort for 27 years. Methods: This study used a cohort study, the “Northern Swedish Cohort”, which consisted of all graduates, n = 1080, from a compulsory school in a Swedish town. Data were collected with a comprehensive questionnaire; response rate 96.4%. Health-behaviour was analysed with binary logistic regression, with health-behaviour at age 21, 30 and 43 years as dependent variable. Besides baseline health-behaviour, gender, somatic and psychological health and socioeconomic background, the analyses were adjusted for work situation and social network. Results: The main findings were that education reduces the probability of unhealthy behaviour over the life course, which held after controlling for early life health-behaviour and possible confounders. The general education effect on health-behaviour was stronger among men than among women. Conclusions: Higher education reduces the probability of unhealthy behavior. Thus, investments in higher education should be an important public goal.
StringhiniSDugravotAShipleyM. Health behaviours, socioeconomic status, and mortality: further analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL prospective cohorts. PLOS Medicine2011;8:e1000419.
2.
StringhiniSSabiaSShipleyM. Association of socioeconomic position with health behaviors and mortality. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc2010;303:1159–66.
3.
LahelmaELallukkaTLaaksonenM. Social class differences in health behaviours among employees from Britain, Finland and Japan: the influence of psychosocial factors. Health Place2010;16:61–70.
4.
CutlerDMLleras-MuneyA. Education and health: evaluating theories and evidence. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, USA, 2006.
5.
RossCEWuC-L. The links between education and health. Am Socio Rev1995;60:719–45.
6.
RossCEMirowskyJ. Gender and the health benefits of education. Sociol Q2010;51:1–19.
7.
JohnstonG. Healthy, wealthy and wise?A review of the wider benefits of education. Wellington, New Zealand: N Z Treasury, 2004.
8.
BabonesS. Income, education, and class gradients in health in global perspective. Health Sociol Rev2010;19:130–43.
9.
MuraskoJE. A lifecourse study on education and health: The relationship between childhood psychosocial resources and outcomes in adolescence and young adulthood. Soci Sci Res2007;36:1348–70.
10.
RossCEWuCL. Education, age, and the cumulative advantage in health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior1996:104–20.
11.
HouseJSLandisKRUmbersonD. Social relationships and health. Science1988;241:540.
12.
VandervoortD. Quality of social support in mental and physical health. Curr Psychol1999;18:205–22.
13.
MondenCWSVan LentheFDe GraafND. Partner’s and own education: does who you live with matter for self-assessed health, smoking and excessive alcohol consumption?Soc Sci Med2003;57:1901–12.
14.
HammarströmA.Health consequences of youth unemployment – review from a gender perspective. Soc Sci Med1994;38:699–709.
15.
UitenbroekDGKerekovskaAFestchievaN. Health lifestyle behaviour and socio-demographic characteristics. A study of Varna, Glasgow and Edinburgh. Soc Sci Med1996;43:367–77.
16.
WielersRGlebbeekA. Graduates and the labour market in the Netherlands: three hypotheses and some data. Eur J Educ1995;30:11–30.
17.
NordlundMStehlikTStrandM. Investment in Second-Chance Education for adults and income development in Sweden. J Educ Work2012:1–39.
18.
MooreG. Structural determinants of men’s and women’s personal networks. Am Socio Review1990;55:726–35.
19.
MarmotMWilkinsonR. Social Determinants of Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
20.
RossCEMirowskyJ. Explaining the social patterns of depression: Control and problem solving: or Support and talking?J Health Soc Behav1989;30(2):206–219.
21.
LiemRLiemJH. Psychological effects of unemployment on workers and their families. J Soc Issues1988;44:87–105.
22.
NosikovAJardelJ-P. The European Health Report 2002: WHO Regional Publications European Series, no 97. Copenhagen: World Health Organization: World Health Organization, 2002.
23.
CaldwellJC. Can behaviour be modified to preserve health?Int Soc Sci J1999;51:341–6.
24.
SchnohrCHøjbjerreLRiegelsM. Does educational level influence the effects of smoking, alcohol, physical activity, and obesity on mortality? A prospective population study. Scand J Publ Health2004;32:250–6.
25.
DrieskensSVan OyenHDemarestS. Multiple risk behaviour: increasing socio-economic gap over time?Eur J Publ Health2010;20:634–9.
26.
MurphyKMTopelRH. The value of health and longevity. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005.
27.
BorrellCMuntanerCBenachJ. Social class and self-reported health status among men and women: what is the role of work organisation, household material standards and household labour?Soc Sci Med2004;58:1869–87.
28.
SchrijversCTMvan de MheenHDStronksK. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in the working population: the contribution of working conditions. Int J Epidemiol1998;27:1011–8.
29.
DentonMPrusSWaltersV. Gender differences in health: a Canadian study of the psychosocial, structural and behavioural determinants of health. Soc Sci Med2004;58:2585–600.
30.
Nolen-HoeksemaS. Gender differences in risk factors and consequences for alcohol use and problems. Clin Psychol Rev2004;24:981–1010.
31.
NilssonKStrandhM. Nest leaving in Sweden: The importance of early educational and labor market careers. J Marriage Fam1999;61:1068–79.
32.
SayerLC. Gender, time and inequality: Trends in women’s and men’s paid work, unpaid work and free time. Social Forces2005;84:285–303.
33.
NordenmarkM. Does gender ideology explain differences between countries regarding the involvement of women and of men in paid and unpaid work?Int J Soc Welfare2004;13:233–43.
34.
LewisJÅströmG. Equality, difference, and state welfare: labor market and family policies in Sweden. Fem Stud1992;18:59–87.
35.
DollarDGattiR. Gender inequality, income, and growth: are good times good for women?Policy Research Report on Gender and Development, Working Paper Series1999; 1–40.
36.
Bobbitt-ZeherD. The gender income gap and the role of education. Sociol Educ2007;80:1–22.
37.
HammarströmAJanlertU. Cohort Profile: The Northern Swedish Cohort. Int J Epidemiol2012;41(6): 1545–1552.
38.
GustafssonPEJanlertUTheorellT. Socioeconomic status over the life course and allostatic load in adulthood: results from the Northern Swedish Cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health2011;65:986–992.
39.
HirschJMWallströmMCarlssonAP. Oral Cancer in Swedish Snuff Dippers. Anticancer Res2012;32:3327–30.
40.
WinnDMBlotWJShyCM. Snuff dipping and oral cancer among women in the southern United States. New Engl J Med1981;304:745–9.
41.
WikströmAKStephanssonOKielerH. Snus under är inte ett riskfritt alternativ till rökning [Snuff no risk-free alternative to smoking during pregnancy]. Läkartidningen2011;108:1430–3.
42.
SchildtEBErikssonMHardellL. Oral snuff, smoking habits and alcohol consumption in relation to oral cancer in a Swedish case-control study. Int J Canc1998;77:341–6.
43.
HammarströmAJanlertUTheorellT. Youth unemployment and ill health: results from a 2-year follow-up study. Soc Sci Med1988;26:1025–33.
44.
NovakM. Social inequity in health: explanation from a life course and gender perspective. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University, 2010.
45.
MirowskyJRossCE. Education, personal control, lifestyle and health. Res Aging1998;20:415–49.
