Aims: The aim of the study is to investigate the influence of the school food environment on the dietary behaviours of 11-year-old Norwegian children in elementary schools. Methods: Baseline data from a school-based intervention study: the Health In Adolescents study was used. A total of 1425 11-year-old children from 35 schools from the eastern part of Norway were included. School administrators provided information on the physical, political, and sociocultural school food environment and students reported their intake of fruits, vegetables, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), and snacks. Multilevel modelling was used to assess the school-level variance in dietary behaviours and to investigate the association of school food environmental factors with these dietary behaviours. Results: After adjustment for student characteristics, the school level accounted for a small proportion (1.1%–3.0%) of the variance in the dietary behaviours investigated. None of the investigated school food environmental factors were found to be related to the children’s reported intake of fruits, vegetables, snacks or SSB. Conclusions: Most of the variance in the dietary behaviours investigated was at the personal level. Thus in this sample, the investigated school-level factors do not appear to exert a strong influence on the dietary behaviours of children. Longitudinal studies using validated measures of the school food environment are needed.
BjellandMLienNGrydelandMBerghIHAnderssenSAOmmundsenY. Intakes and perceived home availability of sugar-sweetened beverages, fruit and vegetables as reported by mothers, fathers and adolescents in the HEIA (HEalth In Adolescents) study. Public Health Nutr2011;14(12):2156–65.
2.
YngveAWolfAPoortvlietEElmadfaIBrugJEhrenbladB. Fruit and vegetable intake in a sample of 11-year-old children in 9 European countries: the Pro Children Cross-sectional Survey. Ann Nutr Metab2005;49(4):236–45.
3.
ØverbyNCLillegaardITJohanssonLAndersenLF. High intake of added sugar among Norwegian children and adolescents. Public Health Nutr2004;7(2):285–93.
4.
BereEGlomnesESte VeldeSJKleppKI. Determinants of adolescents’ soft drink consumption. Public Health Nutr2008;11(1):49–56.
5.
StoryMNeumark-SztainerDFrenchS. Individual and environmental influences on adolescent eating behaviors. J Am Diet Assoc2002;102(Suppl 3):S40–51.
6.
MikkiläVRäsänenLRaitakariOTPietinenPViikariJ. Longitudinal changes in diet from childhood into adulthood with respect to risk of cardiovascular diseases: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study. Eur J Clin Nutr2004;58(7):1038–45.
7.
LienNLytleLAKleppKI. Stability in consumption of fruit, vegetables, and sugary foods in a cohort from age 14 to age 21. Prev Med2001;33(3):217–26.
8.
BallKTimperioAFCrawfordDA. Understanding environmental influences on nutrition and physical activity behaviors: where should we look and what should we count?Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2006;3:33.
9.
SallisJFOwenN. Ecological Models, In: GlanzKLewisFMRimerBK editors, Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice. 2nd ed.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1997; 403–24.
10.
KremersSPde BruijnGJVisscherTLvan MechelenWde VriesNKBrugJ. Environmental influences on energy balance-related behaviors: a dual-process view. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2006;3:9.
11.
TownsendNFosterC. Developing and applying a socio-ecological model to the promotion of healthy eating in the school. Public Health Nutr2011;13:1–8.
12.
HoltheALarsenTSamdalO. Understanding barriers to implementing the Norwegian national guidelines for healthy school meals: a case study involving three secondary schools. Matern Child Nutr2011;7(3):315–27.
13.
SwinburnBEggerGRazaF. Dissecting obesogenic environments: the development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Prev Med1999;29(6):563–70.
14.
Neumark-SztainerDFrenchSAHannanPJStoryMFulkersonJA. School lunch and snacking patterns among high school students: associations with school food environment and policies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2005;2(1):14.
15.
KubikMYLytleLAHannanPJPerryCLStoryM. The association of the school food environment with dietary behaviors of young adolescents. Am J Public Health2003;93(7):1168–73.
16.
CullenKWZakeriI. Fruits, vegetables, milk, and sweetened beverages consumption and access to à la carte/snack bar meals at school. Am J Public Health2004;94(3):463–7.
17.
KrølnerRDuePRasmussenMDamsgaardMTHolsteinBEKleppKI. Does school environment affect 11-year-olds’ fruit and vegetable intake in Denmark?Soc Sci Med2009;68(8):1416–24.
18.
VereeckenCABobelijnKMaesL. School food policy at primary and secondary schools in Belgium-Flanders: does it influence young people’s food habits?Eur J Clin Nutr2005;59(2):271–7.
19.
Van der HorstKTimperioACrawfordDRobertsRBrugJOenemaA. The school food environment associations with adolescent soft drink and snack consumption. Am J Prev Med2008;35(3):217–23.
20.
MaesLLievensJ. Can the school make a difference? A multilevel analysis of adolescent risk and health behaviour. Soc Sci Med2003;56(3):517–29.
21.
JohansenARasmussenSMadsenM. Health behaviour among adolescents in Denmark: influence of school class and individual risk factors. Scand J Public Health2006;34(1):32–40.
22.
WestPSweetingHLeylandA. School effects on pupils’ health behaviors: evidence in support of the health promoting school. Research Papers in Education2004;19(3):261–291
23.
Kunnskapsdepartementet. Skolemåltidet i grunnskolen. Kunnskapsgrunnlag, nytte og kostnadsvirkninger og vurdering av ulike skolemåltidsmodeller. Rapport fra arbeidsgruppe nedsatt av Kunnskapsdepartementet [The school meal in the primary school. Knowledge base, cost-benefit analysis and assessment of different models for school meals. Report from a working group appointed by the Ministry of Education and Research; in Norwegian]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research, 2006.
24.
LienNBjellandMBerghIHGrydelandMAnderssenSAOmmundsenY. Design of a 20-month comprehensive, multicomponent school-based randomised trial to promote healthy weight development among 11–13 year olds: the HEalth In Adolescents study. Scand J Public Health2010;38(Suppl 5):38–51.
25.
SubramanianSVJonesKDuncanC. Multilevel methods for public health research. In: KawachiIBerkmanLF editors, Neighborhoods and health. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp 65–111.
26.
Diez RouxAV. The study of group-level factors in epidemiology: rethinking variables, study designs, and analytical approaches. Epidemiol Rev2004;26(1):104–11.
27.
van der HorstKOenemaAFerreiraIWendel-VosWGiskesKvan LentheF. A systematic review of environmental correlates of obesity-related dietary behaviors in youth. Health Educ Res2007;22(2):203–26.
28.
RasmussenMKrølnerRKleppKILytleLBrugJBereE. Determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption among children and adolescents: a review of the literature. Part I: quantitative studies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2006;3:22.
29.
BereEVeierødMBKleppKI. The Norwegian School Fruit Programme: evaluating paid vs. no-cost subscriptions. Prev Med2005;41(2):463–70.
30.
EriksenKHaraldsdóttirJPedersonRFlygerHV. Effect of a fruit and vegetable subscription in Danish schools. Public Health Nutr2003;6(1):57–63.
