Reasons for participation in group-based type 2 diabetes self-management education. A qualitative study

Abstract

Aims: To investigate reasons for participating in group-based diabetes self-management education (DSME) for patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: A qualitative study using focus groups and individual semi-structured interviews was conducted with 22 patients attending seven different groups in Central Norway. Results: Patients with diabetes described two main reasons for attending DSME; experiencing practical problems and feeling insecure. These reasons differed by affecting the patients in two ways — practically or emotionally. Practical problems and feeling insecure both originated from lack of or contradictory information and from lack of contact with other patients with diabetes. This affected the patients’ everyday lives in important areas such as diet, medication, social settings and lifestyle changes. Conclusions: The underlying reason for participating in a DSME was the participants’ experience of having insufficient information about their diabetes, which led to practical problems and emotional insecurity. Being aware of the patients’ reasons for participating can help professionals keep a focus which is more consistent with patients’ needs.

Keywords

Diabetes mellitus type 2 patient education qualitative research self-management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes atlas. International Diabetes Federation; 2006.

Funnell MM , Weiss MA Empowering patients with diabetes. Nursing 2009;39(3):34-7.

Olshansky E. , Sacco D. , Fitzgerald K. , Zickmund S. , Hess R. , Bryce C. , et al. Living with diabetes: normalizing the process of managing diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2008;34(6):1004-12.

Hornsten A. , Sandstrom H. , Lundman B. Personal understandings of illness among people with type 2 diabetes. J Adv Nurs 2004;47(2):174-82.

Peyrot M. , Rubin RR , Lauritzen T. , Snoek FJ , Matthews DR , Skovlund SE Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: results of the Cross-National Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study. Diabet Med 2005;22(10):1379-85.

Aljasem LI , Peyrot M. , Wissow L. , Rubin RR The impact of barriers and self-efficacy on self-care behaviors in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2001;27(3):393-404.

Mosnier-Pudar H. , Hochberg G. , Eschwege E. , Virally ML , Halimi S. , Guillausseau PJ , et al. How do patients with type 2 diabetes perceive their disease? Insights from the French DIABASIS survey. Diabetes Metab 2009;35(3):220-7.

World Health Organization. Therapeutic patient education. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation; 1998.

Funnell MM , Brown TL , Childs BP , Haas LB , Hosey GM , Jensen B. , et al. National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care 2010;33(Suppl 1):S89-S96.

10.

Ockleford E. , Shaw RL , Willars J. , Dixon-Woods M. Education and self-management for people newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study of patients’ views . Chronic Illn 2008;4(1):28-37.

11.

Malterud K. Shared understanding of the qualitative research process. Guidelines for the medical researcher. Fam Pract 1993;10(2):201-6.

12.

Malterud K. Kvalitativ metoder i medisinsk forsning - en innføring (Qualitative methods in medical research - an introduction), 2nd edn. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget AS; 2006.

13.

Woodcock A. , Kinmonth AL Patient concerns in their first year with type 2 diabetes: patient and practice nurse views. Patient Educ Couns 2001;42(3):257-70.

14.

Lawton J. , Parry O. , Peel E. , Douglas M. Diabetes service provision: a qualitative study of newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes patients’ experiences and views . Diabet Med 2005;22(9):1246-51.

15.

Smith SM , O’Leary M. , Bury G. , Shannon W. , Tynan A. , Staines A. , et al. A qualitative investigation of the views and health beliefs of patients with Type 2 diabetes following the introduction of a diabetes shared care service. Diabet Med 2003;20(10):853-7.

16.

White P. , Smith SM , Hevey D. , O’Dowd T. Understanding type 2 diabetes: including the family member’s perspective . Diabetes Educ 2009;35(5):810-17.

17.

Burke JA , Earley M. , Dixon LD , Wilke A. , Puczynski S. Patients with diabetes speak: exploring the implications of patients’ perspectives for their diabetes appointments. Health Commun 2006;19(2):103-14.

18.

Pooley CG , Gerrard C. , Hollis S. , Morton S. , Astbury J. ‘Oh it’s a wonderful practice. . . you can talk to them’: a qualitative study of patients’ and health professionals’ views on the management of type 2 diabetes. Health Soc Care Community 2001;9(5):318-26.

19.

Cooper HC , Booth K. , Gill G. Patients’ perspectives on diabetes health care education. Health Educ Res 2003;18(2):191-206.

20.

McDowell JR , McPhail K. , Halyburton G. , Brown M. , Lindsay G. Perceptions of a service redesign by adults living with type 2 diabetes. J Adv Nurs 2009;65(7):1432-41.

21.

Adolfsson ET , Starrin B. , Smide B. , Wikblad K. Type 2 diabetic patients’ experiences of two different educational approaches - a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud 2008;45(7):986-94.

22.

Rogers A. , Gately C. , Kennedy A. , Sanders C. Are some more equal than others? Social comparison in self-management skills training for long-term conditions. Chronic Illn 2009;5(4):305-17.

23.

Holmstrom IM , Rosenqvist U. Misunderstandings about illness and treatment among patients with type 2 diabetes. J Adv Nurs 2005;49(2):146-54.

24.

Rosal MC , Goins KV , Carbone ET , Cortes DE Views and preferences of low-literate Hispanics regarding diabetes education: results of formative research. Health Educ Behav 2004;31(3):388-405.