Locality differences of sickness absence in the context of health and social conditions of the inhabitants

Abstract

Background and aim: Earlier research has suggested that local communities develop different sickness absence practices, expressed in variation in the absence figures. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the work places residing in a locality share similar sickness absence practice. Methods: Register data from the major public sector employers and from private industrial employers were used to compare the absence in two localities. Results: There were significant differences by locality in both branches and both in short and in long sickness absences. Population-level statistics showed a corresponding locality difference in recipients of sickness allowance benefits and in primary healthcare visits, but not in indicators of mortality and morbidity. Social problems were more common in the locality with high rate of absence. Conclusion: Area-specific practice, or habitus, as an independent determinant of sickness absence is discussed and an explicitly sociological context is recommended for debates about ‘‘best sickness absence practices’’ and corresponding intervention measures.

Keywords

Finland food industry employees municipal employees practice sickness absence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Taylor P. International comparisons of sickness absence. Proc Royal Soc Med 1972;65(6):577-80.

Försäkringskassan. Sjukfrånvaron i Sverige i ett europeiskt perspektiv 1983-2004. [Sickness absence in Sweden in a European perspective in 1983-2004] Försäkringskassan, Redovisar 2005:6.

Knutsson A. , Goine H. Occupation and unemployment rates as predictors of long term sickness absence in two Swedish counties. Soc Sci Med 1998;47(1):25-31.

Salminen J.

Talouslama ja sairauspoissaolot. [Economic depression and sickness absence]

Suomen Lääkärilehti 2003;58(1):21-4.

Virtanen M. , Kivimäki M. , Elovainio M. , Virtanen P. , Vahtera J. Local economy and sickness absence: prospective cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005; 59(11):973-8.

Virtanen P. , Nakari R. , Ahonen H. , Vahtera J. , Pentti J. Locality and habitus: the origins of sickness absence practices. Soc Sci Med 2000;50(1):27-39.

Virtanen P. , Siukola A. , Luukkaala T. , Savinainen M. , Arola H. , Nygård C-H. , et al. Sick leaves in four factories: do characteristics of the employees and working conditions explain differences in sickness absence between workplaces? Scand J Work Environ Health 2008;34(4):260-6.

Bourdieu P. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977.

Bourdieu P. Distinction. A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1984.

10.

Virtanen M. , Kivimäki M. , Kouvonen A. , Elovainio M. , Linna A. , Oksanen T. , et al. Average household income, crime, and smoking behaviour in a local area: the 10-Town study. Soc Sci Med 2007;64(9):1904-13.

11.

Kivimäki M. , Forma P. , Wikström J. , Halmeenmäki T. , Pentti J. , Elovainio M. , et al. Sickness absence as a risk marker of future disability pension: the 10-town study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58(8):710-11.

12.

Norrmen G. , Svardsudd K. , Andersson D. Impact of physician-related factors on sickness certification in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2006;24(2):104-9.

13.

Murray J. Social insurance claims as morbidity estimates: sickness or absence? J Society Soc Hist Med 2003; 16(2):225-45.

14.

Marmot M. , Feeney A. , Shipley M. , North F. , Syme S. Sickness absence as a measure of health status and functioning: from the UK Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995;49(2):124-30.

15.

Vahtera J. , Pentti J. , Kivimäki M. Sickness absence as a predictor of mortality among male and female employees. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004;58(4):321-6.

16.

Asplund R. , Marnetoft S-U. , Selander J. , Åkerström B. Place of residence as a correlate of sickness absence in Sweden. Int J Rehabil Res 2007;30(2):147-51.