How are homeless people treated in the healthcare system and other societal institutions? Study of their experiences and trust

Abstract

Aims: To elucidate the perceived treatment that the homeless have received from the healthcare and other societal organisations and to present homeless persons’ trust in the healthcare system and suggestions of necessary changes for improving it. Methods: Homeless individuals in special houses and institutions in the County of Stockholm were asked to answer a short version of a public health survey, including added questions about how they experienced the healthcare providers’ attitudes towards them and how much trust they had in the healthcare system. A total of 155 homeless persons (123 male and 32 female) were interviewed. Results: Three-quarters of the participants stated that they had fairly or very high trust in healthcare services and also felt that they had been fairly or very well treated. Fewer females than males reported being treated well and they declared a lower degree of trust in the healthcare system. The homeless suggest that extra resources be set aside to organise their healthcare, including a higher level of knowledge of the medical problems prevailing in the group. Those who felt badly treated also asked for less neglect and disrespect from the healthcare staff. Conclusions: Even though a majority experience that they are being well treated within the healthcare system, the study also indicated disadvantages in the treatment of homeless persons in Sweden. The study also reveals an imbalance between the official ethical framework in Sweden and of the specific moral of some individual healthcare providers. One way to facilitate their entry into the healthcare system might be to create special surgeries for the homeless.

Keywords

Homeless interview attitudes experiences trust

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

The National Board of Health and Welfare. Homelessness in Sweden 2005 - scale and character. Stockholm ; 2006.

Beijer U. Homelessness and health: analysis of mortality and morbidity from a gender perspective. Thesis from Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; 2009. ISBN 978-91-7409-387-2.

Beijer U. , Andréasson S. Physical diseases among homeless people: gender differences and comparisons with the general population. Scand J Public Health 2009;37(1):93-100.

De Palma P. , Frithiof L. , Persson L. , Klinge B. , Halldin J. , Beijer U. Oral health of homeless adults in Stockholm, Sweden. Acta Odontol Scand 2005;63(1):50-5.

Borg S. Homeless men. A clinical and social study with special references to alcohol abuse. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1978;276:1-90.

Järvinen M. Hjemløse flygtninge og indvandrere. [Homeless refugees and emigrants.]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels forlag; 2004.

Pedersen PV Dårligt liv - dårligt helbred. Socialt udsattes oplevelse af eget liv og sundhed. ([Bad life - bad health. Social marginalized peoples’ perceptions of their own life and health]. http://www.si-folkesundhed.dk/upload/susy_udsat_nr.2_feb._2009.pdf

Bask M. Welfare problems and social exclusion among immigrants in Sweden. European Sociological Review 2005;21(1):73-89.

Stockholm Centre for Public Health. Public health report 2007. http://www.folkhalsoguiden.se/upload/folkh%c3%a4lsoarbete/Public%20Health%20Report%202007%20summary.pdf

10.

Graneheim UH , Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004; 24(2):105-12.

11.

Irestig R. , Lynöe N. , Sun S. , Burström K. Hälsa och livsvillkor bland hemlösa. [Health and living conditions among homeless.]. Socialmedicinsk Tidskrift 2008;85:24-30.

12.

Lindblad A. , Löfmark R. , Lynöe N. Would physician-assisted suicide jeopardize trust in the medical services? An empirical study of attitudes among the general public in Sweden. Scand J Public Health 2009 ;37(3):260-4.

13.

Rosengren A. Mellan ilska och hopp. [Between anger and hope.]. Stockholm : Carlssons bokförlag; 2003 .

14.

Connell RW Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2005.

15.

Wessel M. , Helgesson G. , Lynöe N. Experiencing bad treatment: Qualitative study of patient complaints concerning their reception by public health care in the County of Stockholm. Clinical Ethics 2009 ;4(4):195-201.

16.

Wilkinson R.

Why is violence more common where inequality is greater?

Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004(Dec);1036:1-12.

17.

Gruskin S. , Daniels N. Process is rights: priority setting and fair deliberative process the point: justice and human. Am J Public Health 2008;98(9):1573-7.

18.

Rawls J. A theory of justice. Cambridge (MS): Belknap; 1999.

19.

Norredam M. , Album D. Prestige and its significance for medical specialties and diseases. Scand J Public Health 2007;35(1):655-61.

20.

Album D. , Westin S. Do diseases have a prestige hierarchy? A survey among physicians and medical students. Soc Sci Med 2008;66(1):182-8.

21.

Carlsson P. , Liss P. , Sandman L. Replik till Nils-Eric Sahlin: Fortsatt analys behövs av förslaget till reviderade riktlinjer för prioriteringar. [Response to Nils-Eric Sahlin: Continued analysis of the proposal for revised guidelines and priorities is needed.]. Läkartidningen 2008;105(47):3458-9.