Determinants of health promotion action in primary health care: Comparative study of health and home care personnel in four municipalities in Finland

Abstract

Aims: The purpose of this paper is to contribute to understanding which factors influence health promotion action in primary health care (PHC) on the municipal, i.e. local, level. Methods: A cross-sectional mail survey of all PHC personnel in four municipalities in Finland in 2002. The data were analysed by descriptive statistics, and univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 417 (response rate 57%) healthcare professionals participated in the study; 65% of the personnel working in ambulatory care, 52% working in home care and 44% working in inpatient care were engaged in health promotion action (=higher than median engagement). Factors independently associated with engagement in health promotion were organizational values, reflected in perceived skill discretion and social support from coworkers, and the personnel's competence, reflected in knowledge about the health and living conditions of the population served. Further, the opportunities, reflected in cooperation with partners outside the organization were strongly associated with engagement in health promotion action. Conclusions: The results suggest that working conditions such as possibilities for skill usage, reflection and development as well as collegial support enable higher engagement in health promotion action in PHC. However, access to data on the local population's health and living conditions, in addition to opportunities to cooperate with decision makers and partners in the community turned out to be as important. This should be taken into consideration when striving to reorient health services to health promotion.

Keywords

Health promotion municipalities primary health care

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

WHO. Ottawa charter for health promotion. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1986.

Wise M. , Nutbeam D.

Enabling health systems transformation: what progress has been made in re-orienting health services?

Promot Educ 2007;Suppl 2:23-7.

Tang K-C. , Beaglehole R. , O'Byrne D. Policy and partnership for health promotion - addressing the determinants of health. Bull WHO 2005;83. Web version only, available at: http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/83/12/884.pdf (accessed 13 June 2008).

Miilunpalo S. , Laitakari J. , Vuori I. Strengths and weaknesses in health counseling in Finnish primary health care. Patient Educ Couns 1995;25:317-28.

Ewing G. , Selassie A. , Lopez C. , McCutcheon E. Self-report of delivery of clinical preventive services by US physicians . Am J Prev Med 1999;17:62-72.

Jacobsen E. , Rasmussen S. , Christensen M. , Engberg M. , Lauritzen T. Perspectives on lifestyle intervention: The views of general practitioners who have taken part in a health promotion study . Scand J Public Health 2005;33:4-10.

Benson A. , Latter S. Implementing health promoting nursing: the integration of interpersonal skills and health promotion. J Adv Nurs 1998 ;27:100-7.

Sourtzi P. , Nolan P. , Andrews R. Evaluation of health promotion activities in community nursing practice. J Adv Nurs 1996;24:1214-23.

Delnevo C. , Steinberg M. , Abatemarco D. , Hausman A. Correlates of clinical preventive practices among internal medicine residents. Prev Med 2003;36:645-51.

10.

Joffres C. , Heath S. , Farquharson J. , Barkhouse K. , Hood R. , Latter C. , Maclean DR Defining and operationalizing capacity for heart health promotion in Nova Scotia, Canada . Health Promot Int 2004;19:39-49.

11.

Hudon E. , Beaulieu M-D. , Roberge D. Integration of the recommendations of the Canadian task force on preventive health care. Fam Pract 2004;21:11-17.

12.

Germann K. , Wilson D. Organizational capacity for community development in regional health authorities: a conceptual model. Health Prom Int 2004;19:289-98.

13.

Riley B. , Taylor M. , Elliott S. Determinants of implementing heart health promotion activities in Ontario public health units: a social ecological perspective. Health Ed Res 2001;16:425-41.

14.

Robinson K. , Driedger M. , Elliott S. , Eyles J. Understanding facilitators of and barriers to health promotion practice. Health Prom Practice 2006;7:467-76.

15.

Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Government resolution on the Health 2015 public health programme. Publications of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, 2001. p 6.

16.

Simonsen-Rehn N. , vretveit J. , Laamanen R. , Suominen S. , Sundell J. , Brommels M. Determinants of health promotion action: comparative analysis of local voluntary associations in four municipalities in Finland . Health Prom Int 2006;21:274-83.

17.

Rütten A. , von Lengerke T. , Abel T. , Kannas L. , Lüschen G. , Rodríguez Diaz JA , et al. Policy, competence and participation: empirical evidence for a multilevel health promotion model . Health Prom Int 2000 ;15:35-47.

18.

von Wright GH Determinism and the study of man. In: Manninen J , Tuomela R , editors. Essays on explanation and understanding. Dordrecht: D. Reidel; 1976. p. 415-435.

19.

WHO Secretariat. Global health promotion scaling up for 2015 - A brief review of major impacts and developments over the past 20 years and challenges for 2015. Background document for the 6th global conference on health promotion in Bangkok , Thailand; 2005. Available at: www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/6gchp/en (accessed 13 June 2008).

20.

Kanter RM Men and women of the corporation, (2nd edn). New York: Basic Books; 1993.

21.

Laschinger H. , Finegan J. , Shamian J. , Casier S. Organizational trust and empowerment in restructured healthcare settings: effects on staff nurse commitment. J Nurs Adm 2000;30:413-25.

22.

Laamanen R. , vretveit J. , Sundell J. , Simonsen-Rehn N. , Suominen S. , Brommels M. Client perceptions of the performance of public and independent not for profit primary care. Scand J Public Health 2006;34: 598-608.

23.

Karasek RA Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Admin Sci Q 1979;24:285-308.

24.

Williams G. , Levesque C. , Zeldman A. , Wright S. , Deci E. Health care practitioners' motivation for tobacco-dependence counseling. Health Ed Res 2003;18:538-53.

25.

Gillies P. Effectiveness of alliances and partnerships for health promotion. Health Prom Int 1998 ;13:99-120.

26.

Riley B. Dissemination of heart health promotion in the Ontario Public Health System: 1989-1999. Health Ed Res 2003;18:15-31.

27.

Swedish National Institute of Public Health. Towards a more health promoting health service. Swedish National Institute of Public Health R 2006:30. Web version available at: www.fhi.se/upload/ar2006/Rapporter/R200630_health_promoting_0702.pdf (accessed 13 June 2008).

28.

Rimpelaö M. , Saaristo V. , Wiss K. , Kivimaöki H. , Kosunen E. , Rimpelaö A. Health promotion in the public health work of the municipalities in 2005: Planning, leadership, follow-up and evaluation; 2006. (In Finnish) Available at: http://info.stakes.fi/kansanterveystyo/FI/index.htm (accessed 13 June 2008).

29.

Riley B. , Taylor M. , Elliott S. Organizational capacity and implementation change: a comparative case study of heart health promotion in Ontario public health agencies. Health Ed Res 2003;18:754-69.

30.

Johnson A. , Baum F. Health promoting hospitals: a typology of different organizational approaches to health promotion. Health Prom Int 2001;16:281-7.

31.

Peduzzi P. , Concato J. , Kemper E. , Holford T. , Feinstein A. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis . J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:1373-9.