Screening for postpartum depression with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): An ethical analysis

Abstract

Aims: To assess the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), a self-administered questionnaire created to screen for symptoms of postpartum depression in the community, from an epidemiological and ethical perspective. Screening, as the practice of investigating apparently healthy individuals to detect unrecognised disease or its precursors, has interpretation problems and is complicated by deliberations on probabilities for something to occur, on which the scientific community is unanimous. Methods: Our ethical analysis is made using a framework with two different dimensions, the ethical principles autonomy and beneficence and the affected persons. To balance the ethical costs and the ethical benefits of EPDS an analogy with the assessment of pharmaceutics is used. Results: In this article we argue that routine EPDS screening of Swedish postpartum women would lead to considerable ethical problems due to the weak scientific foundation of the screening instrument. Despite a multitude of published studies, the side-effects in terms of misclassifications have not been considered carefully. The EPDS does not function very well as a routine screening instrument. The dualism created is too reductive and fails to recognize the plurality of difference that exists in the social word. Conclusions: Public health authorities should not advocate screening of unproved value. Screening is not just a medical issue but also an ethical one.

Keywords

Autonomy beneficence EPDS ethics postpartum depression public health screening

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gordon RE Emotional disorders of pregnancy and child-bearing . J Med Soc NJ 1957;54:16—23.

Brockington I. Postpartum psychiatric disorders . Lancet 2004;363:303—10.

Paykel ES , Emms EM , Fletcher J. , Rassaby ES Life events and social support in puerperal depression . Br J Psychiatry 1980;136:339—46.

Cox JL , Murray D. , Chapman G. A controlled study of the onset, duration, and prevalence of postnatal depression . Br J Psychiatry 1993;163:27—31.

O'Hara MW , Swain AM Rates and risk of postpartum depression — a meta-analysis . Int Rev Psychiatry 1996;8: 37—54.

Wickberg B. , Hwang CP Screening for postnatal depression in a population-based Swedish sample . Acta Psychiatr Scand 1997;95:62—6.

Nielsen Forman D , Videbech P. , Hedegaard M. , Dalby Salvig J , Secher NJ Postpartum depression . Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107:1210—17.

Eberhard-Gran M. , Eskild A. , Tambs K. , Opjordsmoen S. , Samuelsen SO Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale . Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001;104:243—9.

Berle JO , Aarre TF , Mykletun A. , Dahl AA , Holsten F. Screening for postnatal depression. Validation of the Norwegian version of the Edingburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, and assessment of risk factors for postnatal depression . J Affect Disord 2003;76:151—6.

10.

Tronick EZ , Cohn FJ Infant-mother face-to-face interreaction: age and gender differences in coordination and occurrence of miscoordination . Child Dev 1989;60:85—92.

11.

Brazelton TB , Cramer BG The earliest relationship. London: Karnac Books; 1991.

12.

Cox JL , Holden JM , Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression: development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale . Br J Psychiatry 1987;150: 782—6.

13.

Wilson JMG , Junger G. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Geneva : World Health Organization ; 1968 .

14.

Kinghorn GR Screening for sexually transmitted infections . Dermatol Clin 1998;16:663—7.

15.

Raffle AE New tests in cervical screening . Lancet 1998;351: 297 .

16.

Harris B. , Huckle P. , Thomas R. , Johns S. , Fung H. The use of rating scales to identify post-natal depressions . Br J Psychiatry 1989;154:813—17.

17.

Murray L. , Carothers AD The validation of the Edingburgh Post-natal Depression Scale on a community sample . Br J Psychiatry 1990;157:288—90.

18.

Zelkowitz P. , Milet TH Screening for post-partum depression in a community sample . Can J Psychiatry 1995 ;40: 80—6.

19.

Pop VJ , Komproe IH , van Son MJ Characteristics of the Edinburgh Post Natal Depression Scale in The Netherlands . J Affect Disord 1992;26:105—10.

20.

Gudeney N. , Fermanian J. Validation of the French version of the Edingburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS): new results about use and psychometric properties . Eur Psychiatry 1998;13:83—9.

21.

Wickberg B. , Hwang CP The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: validation on a Swedish community sample . Acta Psychiatr Scand 1996;94:181—4.

22.

Eberhard-Gran M. , Eskild A. , Tambs K. , Schei B. , Opjordsmoen S. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; validation in a Norwegian community sample . Nord J Psychiatry 2001;55:113—17.

23.

Francoeur RT Biomedical ethics. A guide to decision making . New York : John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 1983 .

24.

Nilstun T. Public Health measures with HIV-infection. A model for identification and analysis of ethical conflicts. In: Allebeck P , Jansson B , editors. Ethics in medicine: individual integrity versus demands of society. New York: Raven Press; 1990. p 203—13.

25.

Beauchamp TL , Childress JF Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford Universiy Press; 2001.

26.

Krantz I. , Löwhagen G-B. , Ahlberg BM , Nilstun T. An ethical analysis of serological screening for genital herpes virus type 2 infection in asymptomatic individuals . BMJ 2004;329:618—21.

27.

Westrin C-G. , Nilstun T. The ethics of data utilisation: a comparison between epidemiology and journalism . BMJ 1994 ;308:522—3.

28.

Cochrane AL Effectiveness and efficiency — random reflections on health services . London: Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust; 1972.

29.

Guedeney N. , Fermanian J. , Guelfi JD , Kumar RC The Edingburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) and the detection of major depressive disorders in early postpartum: some concerns about false negatives . J Affect Disord 2000;61:107—12.

30.

Beck CT , Gable RK Comparative analysis of the performance of the postpartum depression screening scale with two other depression instruments . Nurs Res 2001;50: 242—50.