Invitation to a population-based cohort study: differences between subjects recruited using various strategies

Abstract

Aim: The present study compares subjects recruited to a population-based prospective cohort study by community versus personal invitation, and subjects responding late versus early to personal invitation. Subjects were compared with respect to sociodemographic characteristics, selected lifestyle factors, cancer incidence and mortality. Methods: The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study recruited a total of 28,098 subjects between 1991 and 1996. Entire birth-year cohorts, born 1923-50, were recruited using community directed (passive) invitation, and a personal letter of invitation (active recruitment). Information on sociodemography and lifestyle was obtained using a self-administered questionnaire. Anthropometric measurements were assessed at a physical examination. Cancer incidence and cause of death were retrieved using record linkage with national registries. Results: Subjects responding to community directed invitation were older, and more often females, than participants recruited using personal invitation. Furthermore, participants recruited through passive invitation had a comparably more favourable situation with regard to sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. They also had a lower frequency of prevalent disease, lower incidence of cancer and lower mortality. Contrary to this, men were more likely to respond late to a personal letter of invitation and late responders were also older, as compared with subjects responding early to personal invitation. Furthermore, those who responded late had a comparatively unfavourable socioeconomic situation and were characterized by a high prevalence of current smoking, obesity, weight change, and prevalent disease. Conclusions: Subjects who are recruited using different strategies in population-based cohort studies may have different sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics, and may vary with regard to prevalent disease, cancer incidence and subsequent mortality.

Keywords

cancer incidence cohort study invitation lifestyle mortality participants recruitment sociodemographic.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lee RE , McGinnis KA , Sallis JF , Castro CM , Chen AH , Hickmann SA Active versus passive methods of recruiting ethnic minority women to a health promotion program. Ann Behav Med 1998; 19: 378-84.

Siemiatycki J. , Campbell S. Nonresponse bias and early versus all responders in mail and telephone surveys. Am J Epidemiol 1984; 120: 291-301.

Larroque B. , Kaminski M. , Bouvier-Colle MH , Hollebecque V. Participation in a mail survey: role of repeated mailings and characteristics of nonrespondents among recent mothers. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 1999; 13: 218-33.

Lelong N. , Saurel-Cubizolles M. , Romito P. Responses to a postal survey on women's health after birth: importance of repeated mailings and characteristics of non-respondents (in French). Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 1997; 45: 305-14.

Paganini-Hill A. , Hsu G. , Chao A. , Ross RK Comparison of early and late respondents to a postal health survey questionnaire. Epidemiology 1993; 4: 375-9.

Berglund G. The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study. Design biological bank and biomarker programme . J Intern Med 1993; 233: 39-40.

Riboli E. Nutrition and cancer: background and rationale of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Ann Oncol 1992; 3: 783-91.

Berglund G. , Elmståhl S. , Janzon L. , Larsson SA The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study - design and feasibility. J Intern Med 1993; 233: 45-51.

Manjer J. , Carlsson S. , Elmståhl S. , Gullberg B. , Janzon L. , Lindström M. , et al. The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study: representativity, cancer incidence and mortality in participants and non-participants. Eur J Cancer Prev 2001 ; 00: 00-00.

10.

Statistics Sweden. Occupation in Population and Housing census 1985 (FoB 85) according to Nordic standard occupational classifi cation (Nordisk yrkesklassificering, NYM ) and Swedish socioeconomic classifi cation (Socioekonomisk indelning, SEI). Alphabetical version. Örebro, Sweden, Statistics Sweden, 1989.

11.

Hanson BS , Östergren PO , Elmståhl S. , Isacsson SO , Ranstam J. Reliability and validity assessments of measures of social networks, social support and control- results from the Malmö Shoulder and Neck Study . Scand J Soc Med 1997; 25: 249-57.

12.

Epic , Guidelines for collection of end-point data in the EPIC study. Lyon, France, IARC , 1998.

13.

National Board of Health and Welfare. Cancer Incidence in Sweden 1996. Stockholm, Sweden, National Board of Health and Welfare, 1998.

14.

Southern Swedish Regional Tumour Registry. Cancer Incidence in Southern Sweden 1988-1992. Lund, Sweden, Southern Swedish Regional Tumour Registry, 1994.

15.

National Board of Health and Welfare, Centre for Epidemiology. Causes of Death 1996. Stockholm, Sweden, National Board of Health and Welfare, 1998.

16.

Garne JP Invasive Breast Cancer in Malmö 1961-199 a epidemiological study. Thesis, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden, 1996.

17.

Cottler LB , Zipp JF , Robins LN , Spitznagel EL Difficult-to-recruit respondents and their effect on prevalence estimates in an epidemiologic survey. Am J Epidemiol 1987; 125: 329-39.

18.

Holden G. , Rosenberg G. , Barker K. , Tuhrim S. , Brenner B. The recruitment of research participants: a review. Soc Work Health Care 1993; 19: 1-44.

19.

Sarkin JA , Marshall SJ , Larson KA , Calfas KJ , Sallis JF A comparison of methods of recruitment to a health promotion program for university seniors. Prev Med 1998; 27: 562-71.

20.

Etter JF , Perneger TV Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 1123-8.

21.

O'Neill TW , Marsden D. , Silman AJ Differences in the characteristics of responders and non-responders in a prevalence survey of vertebral osteoporosis. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group . Osteoporos Int 1995; 5: 327-34.

22.

Trell E. , Kristenson H. , Petersson B. A risk factor approach to the alcohol-related diseases. Alcohol Alcohol Suppl 1985; 20: 333-45.

23.

Osler M. , Schroll M. Differences between participants and non-participants in a population study on nutrition and health in the elderly. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992; 46: 289-95.

24.

Rosengren A. , Wilhelmsen L. , Berglund G. , Elmfeldt D. Non-participants in a general population study of men, with special reference to social and alcoholic problems. Acta Med Scand 1987; 221: 243-51.

25.

Walker M. , Shaper AG , Cook DG Non-participation and mortality in a prospective study of cardiovascular disease . J Epidemiol Community Health 1987; 41: 295-9.

26.

Weinehall L. , Hallgren CG , Westman G. , Janlert U. , Wall S. Reduction of selection bias in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease through involvement of primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 1998; 16: 171-6.