Technological advancement can displace workers with machines, but also create new jobs. Hence, at the crux of the matter lies a race between the rate of technological advancement and the pace at which educational institutions can empower workers with the right skills. For the countries of the South Asian region, generating jobs for youth will prove to be a challenge in the backdrop of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. This paper investigates the impact of technological advancement on youth unemployment in the context of six South Asian countries, namely, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The results of the panel instrumental variables model estimations show that lower secondary completion rate has a negative relationship and capital–labour ratio has a positive relationship with the share of youth not in employment, education or training. However, since the magnitude of the coefficient of the lower secondary completion rate is greater than the magnitude of the coefficient of the capital–labour ratio, it is concluded that education will win the race against technology in South Asia, as long as the educational attainment rates are high enough to offset the impact of technical progress.
a2i. (2019). Future Skills: Finding emerging skills to tackle the challenges of automation in Bangladesh. a2i - Innovate for All.
2.
BaltagiB. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
3.
BanerjeeA.DoladoJ. J.GalbraithJ. W.HendryD. F. (1993). Co-integration, error-correction, and the econometric analysis of non-stationary data. Oxford University Press.
4.
BloomD. E.WilliamsonJ. G. (1998). Demographic transitions and economic miracles in emerging Asia. The World Bank Economic Review, 12(3), 419–455.
5.
BreitungJ. (2000). The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In BaltagiB. H. (Ed.), Advances in econometrics, Volume 15: Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels (pp. 161–178). Elsevier.
DickeyD. A.FullerW. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431.
11.
DickeyD. A.FullerW. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 49(4), 1057–1072.
EndersW. (2015). Applied econometric time series (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
14.
EngleR. F.GrangerC. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 55(2), 251–276.
15.
GrangerC. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross- spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.
16.
GrangerC. W. (1980). Testing for causality, a personal viewpoint. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2, 329–352.
17.
GrangerC. W. (1981). Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification. Journal of Econometrics, 16(1), 121–130.
18.
GrangerC. W. (1983). Co-integrated variables and error-correcting models [Discussion Paper No. 83-13, PhD dissertation]. Department of Economics, University of California at San Diego.
19.
GrangerC. W.NewboldP. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111–120.
ImK. S.PesaranM. H.ShinY. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.
22.
LütkepohlH.KrätzigM. (2004). Applied time series econometrics. Cambridge University Press.
23.
LevinA.LinC.-F.ChuC.-S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.
24.
PedroniP. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 653–670.
25.
PedroniP. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597–625.
26.
PhillipsP. C.PerronP. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.
