Financial sector development serves poor directly through poverty-lending approach or financial systems approach. Robinson (2001) questions the appropriateness of poverty-lending approach for the extremely poor and supports the financial systems approach for providing a poverty alleviation toolbox to serve the poor at various levels. The present study attempts to assess the effectiveness of the two lending approaches and comments on the appropriateness of the same for the poor and the poorest of the poor in rural India using state-wise annual data from 1999–2000 to 2011–2012. We conduct a panel data analysis for a sample of 15 major Indian states and provide an empirical evidence for the effect of various poverty alleviation tools on the poor and the poorest of the poor in rural India. The study partially supports the use of tools suggested by Robinson.
AgenorP.R. (2004). The economics of adjustment and growth. San Juan: Universidad de P.R.
2.
AllenF.CarlettiE.CullR.QianJ.SenbetL.ValenzuelaP. (2012b). Resolving the African financial development gap: Cross-country comparisons and a within-country study of Kenya. In EdwardsS.JohnsonS.WeilD. (Eds), NBER volume on African economic successes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
AllenF.ChakrabartiR.DeS.QianM. (2012a). Financing firms in India. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 21(3), 409–445.
4.
AllenF.QianJ.QianM. (2005). Law, finance, and economic growth in China.Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), 57–116.
5.
AnsariS.A. (2007). Micro finance in India. Asian Economic Review, 49(2), 327–336.
6.
ArmendarizdeAghionB.MorduchJ. (2010). The economics of microfinance (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
7.
ArunaM.JyothirmayiR. (2011). The role of MF in women empowerment: A study on the SHG bank linkage program in Hyderabad (Andhra Pradesh).Indian Journal of Commerce & Management Studies, 2(4), 77–95.
8.
BanerjeeA.DufloE.GlennersterR.KinnanC. (2009). The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. Working paper 18950, MIT.
9.
BanerjeeA.NewmanA. (1993). Occupational choice and the process of development. Journal of Political Economy, 101(2), 274–298.
10.
BeckT.Demirguc-KuntA.LevineR. (2004). Finance, inequality and poverty: Cross-country evidence. Working paper 3338, World Bank, Washington, DC.
11.
BeckT.Demirguc-KuntA.LevineR. (2007). Finance, inequality and the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 27–49.
12.
BeckerG.S.TomesN. (1979). An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility. Journal of Political Economy, 87(6), 1153–1189.
13.
BhanumurthyN.R.MitraA. (2004). Economic growth, poverty, and inequality in Indian states in the pre-reform and reform periods. Asian Development Review, 21(2), 79–99.
14.
BhavaniT.A.BhanumurthyN.R. (2012). Financial access in post-reform India.New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
15.
ChoubeyB.N. (1983). Agricultural banking in India. New Delhi: National Publishing House.
16.
ChristenR.P. (1997). Banking services for the poor: Managing for financial success. Boston: ACCION International.
17.
DavisP. (2007). Discussions among the poor: Exploring poverty dynamics with focus groups in Bangladesh. Working paper 84, IDPM, University of Manchester, Manchester.
18.
DollarD.KraayA. (2002). Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(3), 195–225.
19.
DurbinJ. (1954). Errors in variables. Review of the International Statistical Institute, 22, 23–32.
20.
DuvendackM.Palmer-JonesR.CopestakeJ.G.HooperL.LokeY.RaoN. (2011). What is the evidence of the impact of microfinance on the well-being of poor people?London: EPPI-Centre. Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
21.
FanS.HazellP.ThoratS.(2000).Government spending, agricultural growth, and poverty in rural India.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(4), 1038–1051.
22.
FisherT.SriramM.S. (2002). Beyond micro-credit: Putting development back into micro-finance. New Delhi: Vistaar Publications; Oxford: Oxfam and New Economics Foundation.
23.
GadenneL.VasudevanV. (2007). How do women in mature SHGs save and invest their money? Evidence from self help groups in India. Working Paper 18, Centre for Microfinance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, Chennai.
24.
GeorgeA.(2005). India untouched: The forgotten face of rural poverty. New York: Writer’s Collective.
25.
GreenwoodJ.JovanovicB. (1990). Financial development, growth, and the distribution of income. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 1076–1107.
26.
GundannavarV.R. (1992). Social banking: Some macro issues. SBI Monthly Review, 31(3).
27.
HaberS. (2005). Mexico’s experiments with bank privatization and liberalization, 1991–2003.Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(8), 2325–2353.
28.
HansenL.P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50, 1029–1054.
29.
HausmanJ.A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251–71.
30.
ImaiK.S.ArunT.AnnimS.K. (2010). Microfinance and household poverty reduction: New evidence from India.World Development, 38(12), 1760–1774.
31.
JalilianH.KirkpatrickC. (2005). Does financial development contribute to poverty reduction?Journal of Development Studies, 41(4), 636–656.
32.
JeanneneyS.G.KpodarK. (2011). Financial development and poverty reduction: Can there be a benefit without a cost?Journal of Development Studies, 47(1), 143–163.
33.
KalpanaK.(2008). The vulnerability of ‘self help’: Women and microfinance in south India. Working paper 303, Institute of Development Studies, United Kingdom.
34.
MisraA. (2006, September). Micro finance in India and millennium development goals: Maximizing impact on poverty. Article presented at the Workshop on World Bank, Singapore.
35.
MookherjeeD.RayD. (2003). Persistent inequality.Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 369–393.
36.
MookherjeeD.RayD. (2010). Inequality and markets: Some implications of occupational diversity. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2(1), 38–76.
37.
MundialB. (2001). World development report 2000/2001: Attacking poverty. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.
38.
MurtyG.R.K. (2008). Rural credit: A new model of credit delivery for inclusive growth. ICFAI Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 3(2 and 3), 49–66.
39.
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) (1999). Task force report on supportive policy and regulatory framework for micro finance, NABARD, India.
40.
NguyenB.T.AlbrechtJ.W.VromanS.B.WestbrookM.D. (2007). A quantile regression decomposition of urban–rural inequality in Vietnam.Journal of Development Economics, 83(2), 466–490.
41.
OdhiamboN.M. (2010). Is financial development a spur to poverty reduction? Kenya’s experience. Journal of Economic Studies, 37(3), 343–353.
42.
PradeepR.GargA. (2013). Financial inclusion—Viable opportunities in urban India. Faridabad: Chhayadeep Press.
43.
PuhazhendhiV.SatyasaiK.J.S. (2001). Economic and social empowerment of rural poor through self-help groups.Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(3), 450–459.
44.
RajanR.G.ZingalesL. (2004). Saving capitalism from the capitalists: Unleashing the power of financial markets to create wealth and spread opportunity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
45.
RobinsonM. (2001). The microfinance revolution: Sustainable finance for the poor. Washington, DC: World Bank.
46.
SenA. (1997). Agricultural growth and rural poverty. In ChadhaG.K.SharmaA.N. (Eds), Growth employment and poverty change and continuity in rural India. New Delhi: Indian Society of Labor Economics.
47.
SenA. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlements and deprivation. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
48.
ShahbazM.IslamF. (2011). Financial development and income inequality in Pakistan: An application of ARDL approach. Journal of Economic Development, 36(1), 35–58.
49.
ShettyS.L. (1997). Financial sector reforms in India: An evaluation. Prajnan, 25(3–4), 253–287.
50.
SinghG. (2009). Performance of formal rural credit in India (Vol. 1). New Delhi: Allied Publishers.
51.
StiglitzJ.E. (1999). More instruments and broader goals: Moving toward the post-Washington consensus. WIDER Annual Lecture, Helsinki, Finland.
52.
TiwariA.K.ShahbazM.IslamF. (2013). Does financial development increase rural-urban income inequality? Cointegration analysis in the case of Indian economy. International Journal of Social Economics, 40(2), 151–168.
53.
TripathyK.K.JainS.K. (2011). Income impact of micro-enterprise finance: An empirical study on government Initiatives in rural India. International Journal of Rural Management, 7(1–2), 5–26.
54.
WuD. (1973). Alternative tests of independence between stochastic regressors and disturbances. Econometrica, 41, 733–750.
55.
WuD. (1974). Alternative tests of interdependence between stochastic regressors and disturbances: Finite sample results. Econometrica, 42, 529–546.
