This study examines the impact of monetary policy shocks on output, prices and interest rates in Sri Lanka during the period 2003–2012. It finds a strong transmission of policy rate shocks onto the money market rates and the government securities market yields. However, banking sector interest rates exhibit a smaller and slower impact compared to money and government securities market rates. The study also finds a weak policy interest rate transmission onto the real sector and prices. The direction of relationships between variables and policy shocks is in conformity with the existing theoretical and empirical priors. The existence of a large informal economy, volatile excess market liquidity, shallowness of financial markets, relatively less flexible interest rates on deposit and loan products, and fiscal accommodation by monetary policy at times are identified as reasons for weak transmission.
AmarasekaraC. (2005). Interest Rate Pass-through in Sri Lanka. Central Bank of Sri Lanka, Staff Studies, 35(1/2), 1–32.
2.
AmarasekaraC. (2008). The impact of monetary policy on economic growth and inflation in Sri Lanka. Staff Studies, 38(1/2), 1–44.
3.
BarakchianM.CroweC. (2010). Monetary policy matters: New evidence based on a new shock measure (Working Paper No. WP/10/230). Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund.
4.
BernankeB.BoivinJ.EliaszP. (2005). Measuring the effects of monetary policy: A factor-augmented vector autoregressive (FAVAR) approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, 120(1), 387–422.
5.
BernankeB.GertlerM.WatsonM. (1997). Systematic monetary policy and the effects of oil price shocks. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 28(1), 91–142.
6.
BernankeB.MihovI. (1998). Measuring monetary policy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 869–902.
7.
BrischettoA.VossG. (1999). A structural vector autoregression model of monetary policy in Australia (Research Discussion Paper, 1999–11). Sydney, NSW: Reserve Bank of Australia.
8.
CerdeiroD. (2010). Measuring monetary policy in open economies: Argentina (Policy Research Working Paper WPS5252). Washington, D.C: World Bank.
9.
ChristianoL.EichenbaumM.CharlesE. (1996). Identification and the effects of monetary policy shocks. Economic Perspectives, 94(7), 2–13.
10.
ChristianoL.EichenbaumM.CharlesE. (1999). Monetary policy shocks: What have we learned and to what end? In TaylorJ. B.WoodfordM. (Eds), Handbook of macroeconomics (pp. 65–148). Elsevier: Amsterdam & North Holland.
11.
ChukuC. (2009). Measuring the effects of monetary policy innovations in Nigeria: A structural vector autoregressive approach. African Journal of Accounting, Economics, Finance and Banking Research, 5(5), 112–129.
12.
DavoodiH.DixitS.PinterG. (2013). Monetary policy transmission mechanism in the East African community: An empirical investigation (Working Paper No. WP/13/39). Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
13.
EspinozaR.PrasadA. (2012). Monetary policy transmission in the GCC countries (Working Paper No. 12/132). Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
14.
FukudaY.KimuraY.SudoN.UgaiH. (2013, November). Cross-country transmission effect of the U.S. monetary shock under global integration (Working Paper Series No.13-E-16). Tokyo: Bank of Japan.
15.
GambacortaL.HofmannB.PeersmanG. (2012). The effectiveness of unconventional monetary policy at the zero lower bound: A cross-country analysis (BIS Working Papers No. 384). Basel: Bank for International Settlements.
16.
KimS. (1999). Do monetary policy shocks matter in the G-7 countries? Using common identifying assumptions about monetary policy across countries. Journal of International Economics, 48(2), 387–412.
17.
KimS.RoubiniN. (2000). Exchange rate anomalies in the industrial countries: A solution with a structural VAR approach. Journal of Monetary Economics, 45(3), 561–586.
18.
LeeperE.SimsC.ZhaT. (1996). What Does Monetary Policy Do? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program. The Brookings Institution, 27(2), 1–78.
19.
MishraP.MontielP. (2013). How effective is monetary transmission in low-income countries? A survey of the empirical evidence. Economic Systems, 37(2), 187–216.
20.
NorrisD.FloerkemeierH. (2006). Transmission mechanisms of monetary policy in Armenia: Evidence from VAR analysis (IMF Working Paper No. 06/248). Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund.
21.
SimsC. (1972). Money, income, and causality. American Economic Review, 62(4), 540–552.
22.
SimsC. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1–48.
23.
SimsC. (1992). Interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts: The effects of monetary policy. European Economic Review, 36(June), 974–1011.
24.
SimsC.ZhaT. (1995). Does monetary policy generate recessions?Macroeconomic Dynamics, 10(2), 231–272.
25.
SmetsF.WoutersR. (2003, September). An estimated dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model of the euro area. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(5), 1123–1175.
26.
SmetsF.WoutersR. (2007). Shocks and frictions in US business cycles: A Bayesian DSGE approach. American Economic Review, 97(3), 586–606.
27.
SousaJ.ZaghiniA. (2007). Global monetary policy shocks in the G5: A SVAR approach. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 17(5), 403–419.
28.
TsangaridesC. (2010). Monetary policy transmission in Mauritius using a VAR analysis (IMF Working Paper No. WP/10/36). Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund.
