Does ASEAN–India Trade Stimulate Income? A Cointegration Analysis Using the ARDL Approach

Abstract

This article aims to address the extent of income that has been attributed by trade between India and the ASEAN-5 countries (namely, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand) from the year 1970 till 2014. This study adopts the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bound test approach to cointegration, with long- and short-run parameter estimates to investigate the impact of regional trade between India and ASEAN-5. The cointegration test results confirmed the presence of a long-run relationship only for India, and no cointegration evidence was found for the ASEAN-5 economies. The long-run parameter estimates showed no influence of ASEAN–India trade on India’s income and a positive impact of India’s trade to the rest of the world on India’s income by about 0.58 per cent in the long run. Interestingly, ASEAN–India trade is positively influencing India’s income in the short run, and the extent of the impact tends to be small. This article concludes that there is limited evidence to support the claim that ASEAN–India trade stimulates income for the case of India and ASEAN-5 countries.

Keywords

Trade income ASEAN India FTA

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ASEAN Secretariat. (2014). Overview of ASEAN–India dialogue relations. The ASEAN Secretariat, Jakarta, Indonesia. Retrieved 21 May 2015, from http://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/2015/November/asean-india/Overview%20ASEAN-India%20Dialogue%20Relations%20-%20November%202015.pdf

Bahmani-Oskooee

Wang

(2008). The J-curve: Evidence from commodity trade between US and China. Applied Economics, 40(21), 2735–2747.

Balasubramaniam

Puah

C.H.

Mansor

S. A.

(2012). Economic interdependence: Evidence from China and ASEAN-5 countries. Modern Economy, 3(1), 122–125.

Balasubramanyam

V. N.

Salisu

M. A.

Sapsford

(1996). Foreign direct investment and growth in EP and IS countries. The Economic Journal, 106(434), 92–105.

Coe

D. T.

Moghadam

(1993). Capital and trade as engines of growth in finance. IMF Staff Papers, 40(3), 542–566.

Economidou

Lei

Netz

J. S.

(2006). International integration and growth: A further investigation on developing countries. International Advances in Economic Research, 12(4), 435–448.

Edwards

(1992). Trade orientation, distortions and growth in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 39(1), 31–57.

Engle

R. E.

Granger

C. W. J.

(1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.

Francis

(2011). A sectoral impact analysis of the ASEAN–India free trade agreement. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(2), 46–55.

10.

Francis

Kallumal

(2013). India’s comprehensive trade agreements: Implications for development trajectory. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(31), 109–122.

11.

Grossman

G. M.

Helpman

(1991a). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

12.

Grossman

G. M.

Helpman

(1991b). Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European Economic Review, 35(2–3), 517–526.

13.

Hakkio

C. S.

Rush

(1991). Cointegration: How short is the long run? Journal of International Money and Finance, 10(1), 571–581.

14.

Haveman

J. D.

Lei

Netz

J. S. B.

(2001). International integration and growth: A survey and empirical investigation. Review of Development Economics, 5(2), 289–311.

15.

Italianer

M. A.

Pisani-Ferry

M. J.

(1994). Whither the gains from European economic integration? Revue Économique, 45(3), 689–702.

16.

Johansen

Juselius

(1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with application to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–221.

17.

Kohpaiboon

(2003). Foreign trade regime and FDI-growth nexus: A case study of Thailand. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 55–69.

18.

Liu

(2009). Exploring the relationship between urbanization and energy consumption in China using ARDL (autoregressive distributed lag) and FDM (factor decomposition model). Energy, 34(11), 1846–1854.

19.

Love

Chandra

(2004). An index of openness and its relationship with growth in India. The Journal of Developing Areas, 38(1), 37–54.

20.

Mankiw

N. G.

Romer

Weil

D. N.

(1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437.

21.

Nambiar

(2015). India’s relationship with ASEAN: Seizing trade and investment opportunities. In AIC–RIS (Ed.), ASEAN–India economic relations: Opportunities and challenges. New Delhi: ASEAN–India Centre and Research and Information System for Developing Countries.

22.

Narayan

P. K.

(2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37, 1979–1990.

23.

Narayan

P.K.

Narayan

(2005). Estimating income and price elasticities of imports for Fiji in a cointegration framework. Economic Modeling, 22(3), 423–438.

24.

Narayan

P. K.

Smyth

(2005).Trade liberalization and economic growth in Fiji. An empirical assessment using the ARDL approach. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 10(1), 96–115.

25.

Oguanobi

C. R.

Akamobi

A. A.

Nzeribe

G. E.

Aniebo

C. A.

Chukwuma

O. T.

(2014). Intra-regional trade and sectoral performances: A VAR analysis of the Nigerian economy. Foreign Trade Review, 49(1), 95–106.

26.

Pesaran

Shin

(1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modeling approach to cointegration analysis. In Strom

(Ed.), Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century: The Ragnar Frisch centennial symposium (pp. 371–413). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

27.

Pesaran

M. H.

Shin

Smith

(2001). Bound testing approaches to the analysis of level relationship. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.

28.

Rajendram

(2014). India’s new Asia-Pacific strategy: Modi acts east (Working Paper). Sydney: Lowy Institute.

29.

Ranjbar

Elmi

(2010). Accelerating and growth effects of trade openness across OIC countries. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, 31(2), 49–64.

30.

Rivera-Batiz

L. A.

Romer

P. M.

(1991). Economic integration and endogenous growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 531–555.

31.

Sari

Soytas

(2009). Are global warming and economic growth compatible? Evidence from five OPEC countries? Applied Energy, 86(10), 1887–1893.

32.

Shahbaz

(2012). Does trade openness affect long run growth? Cointegration, causality and forecast error variance decomposition tests for Pakistan. Economic Modeling, 29(6), 2325–2339.

33.

Tang

T. C.

Nair

(2002). A cointegration analysis of Malaysian import demand function: Reassessment from the bounds test. Applied Economics Letters, 9(5), 293–296.

34.

Vamvakidis

(1999). Regional trade agreement and broad liberalization: Which path leads to faster growth? International Monetary Fund Staff Paper, 46(1), 42–68.

35.

Wooster

R. B.

Dude

Banda

T. M.

(2008). The contribution of intra-regional and extra-regional trade to growth: Evidence from the European Union. Journal of Economic Integration, 23(1), 161–182.

36.

Yanikkaya

(2003). Trade openness and economic growth: A cross country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 72(1), 57–89.