Do Bangladesh and Sri Lanka Enjoy Export-Led Growth? A Comparison of Two Small South Asian Economies

Abstract

The export-led growth (ELG) hypothesis suggests that there is a strong positive linear relationship between a country’s exports and economic growth. For many years, theoretical and empirical studies have examined the causal relationship between exports and economic growth and found that this relationship is one of interdependence rather than of unilateral causation. The purpose of this article is to empirically re-examine the ELG hypothesis in the context of two small South Asian countries: Bangladesh for the period of 1980–2011 and Sri Lanka for the period of 1984–2011. Using a model that controls for a host of domestic and international factors, this article tests the ELG hypothesis by employing the Auto Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds test for cointegration and the Granger causality tests. The empirical results confirm the validity of the ELG hypothesis for both Bangladesh and Sri Lanka.

Keywords

Export-led growth Bangladesh Sri Lanka ARDL bounds test Granger causality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abhayaratatne

A.S.P.

(1996). Foreign trade and economic growth: Evidence from Sri Lanka, 1960–1992. Applied Economic Letters, 3(9), 567–570.

Akaike

(1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

Ambrose

Sundarraj

(2014). A brief analysis on India’s trade with SAARC countries: Recent trends. Global Journal of Human-Social Science: E Economics, 14(6), 26–30.

Athukorala

(2012). Sri Lanka’s trade policy: Reverting to dirigisme?. The World Economy, 35(12), 1662–1686. doi: 10.1111/twec.12039

Athukorala

Jayasuriya

(1994). Macroeconomic policies, crises and growth in Sri Lanka, 1969–90. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Athukorala

Rajapatirana

(2000). Liberalisation and industrial transformation: Sri Lanka in international perspective. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Awokuse

T.O.

(2008). Trade openness and economic growth: Is growth export-led or import-led?. Applied Economics, 40(2), 161–173.

Bahmani Oskooee

Nasir

A.B.M

. (2004). ARDL approach to test the productivity bias hypothesis. Review of Development Economics, 8(3), 483–488.

Balasubramanyam

V. N.

Salisu

M. A.

Sapsford

(1996). Foreign direct investment and growth in EP and IS countries. The Economic Journal, 106(434), 92–105.

10.

Barro

R. J.

(1999). Determinants of economic growth: A cross-country empirical study. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

11.

Bruton

H. J.

Abeysekera

Sanderatne

Aznan

Y. Z.

(1992). The political economy of poverty, equity, and growth Sri Lanka and Malaysia. New York: Oxford University Press.

12.

Cipamba

(2013). The export–output relationship in South Africa: An empirical investigation (ERSA Working Paper 355). Cape Town: Economic Research South Africa.

13.

Dash

Ranjan Kumar

. (2009). Revisited export-led growth hypothesis: An empirical study on India. South Asia Economic Journal, 10(2), 305–324.

14.

de Silva

K. M

. (2001). Ethnicity and governance in the third world: Case studies from South and Southeast Asia - Sri Lanka and Malaysia. In Mukum

M.J.

Pita

A.O.

Mwangi

K.S.

(Eds), Ethnicity and governance in the Third World (pp. 251–294). London: Ashgate Publishing.

15.

Dunham

Kelegama

(1997). Does leadership matters in the economic reform process? Liberalisation and governance in Sri Lanka. World Development, 25(2), 179–190.

16.

Engle

R. F.

Granger

C. W. J.

(1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing, Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.

17.

Feenstra

R. C.

Robert

Marcel

P. T.

(2013). The next generation of the Penn World Table. Retrieved 25 November 2014, from www.ggdc.net/pwt

18.

(2005). Exports, technical progress and productivity growth in a transition economy: A non-parametric approach for China. Applied Economics, 37(7), 725–739.

19.

Granger

C. W. J.

(1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.

20.

Herzer

Nowak-Lehmann D

Siliverstovs

(2006). Export-led growth in Chile: Assessing the role of export composition in productivity growth. The Developing Economies, 44(3), 306–328.

21.

Herath

H.M.S.P

. (2010). Impact of trade liberalization on economic growth of Sri Lanka: An econometric investigation. Paper presented at Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka. Retrieved from http://www.kln.ac.lk/uokr/ICBI2010/6.pdf

22.

Jawaid

S. T.

Raza

S. A.

(2012). Remittances, growth and convergence: Evidence from developed and developing countries (MPRA Paper No. 39002). Germany: University Library of Munich. Retrieved 20 July 2015, from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/39002/1/MPRA_paper_39002.pdf

23.

Javed

Falak

Awan

Ashfaq

(2012). Foreign direct investment, trade and economic growth: A comparison of selected South Asian Countries. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 210–220.

24.

Jin

J. C.

E.S.H.

(1996). Exports-led growth and the US economy, another look. Applied Economics Letters, 3(5), 341–344.

25.

Johansen

(1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2–3), 231–254. doi: 10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3

26.

Johansen

Juselius

(1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210.

27.

Kelegama

(2014, July 2). Bangladesh-Sri Lanka trade and investment ties make major strides. The Daily Star. Retrieved 3 July 2015, from http://www.thedailystar.net/bangladesh-sri-lanka-trade-and-investment-ties-make-major-strides-31291

28.

Kelegama

Foley

(1999). Impediments to promoting backward linkages from the garment industry in Sri Lanka. World Development, 27(8), 1445–1460. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00069-8

29.

Kohpaiboon

(2003). Foreign trade regime and FDI-growth nexus: A case study of Thailand. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 55–69.

30.

Lucas

(1993). Making a miracle. Econometrica, 61(2), 251–272.

31.

(1997). Leading the left to the right: Populist coalitions and economic reforms. World Development, 25(7), 1009–1028.

32.

Nain

Ahmad

(2010). Export-led hypothesis in India: Some further evidences. The IUP Journal of Monetary Economics, 8(3), 69–82.

33.

Narayan

P.K.

(2004). Reformulating critical values for the bounds F-statistics approach to cointegration: An application to the tourism demand model for Fiji (Working Paper No. 02/04). Australia: Department of Economics, Monash University.

34.

Narayan

P.K.

(2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979–1990.

35.

Nubin

(2002). Sri Lanka: Current issues and historical background. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

36.

Oxenham

Diallo

Katahoire

Petkova-Mwangi

Sall

(2002). Skills and literacy training for better livelihoods: A review of approaches and experiences. Adult Education and Development, 58, 8–44.

37.

Panagariya

(2003). South Asia: Does preferential trade liberalization make sense. World Economy, 26(9), 1279–1291.

38.

Paul

B.P.

(2014). Testing export–led growth in Bangladesh: An ARDL bound test approach. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 5(1), 3–4.

39.

Pesaran

M.H.

Shin

Smith

R.J.

(1996). Testing for the existence of a long-run relationship (DAE Working Papers Amalgamate Series No. 9622). Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.

40.

Pesaran

M. H.

Shin

Smith

R. J.

(2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. doi: 10.1002/jae.616

41.

Phillips

P.C.B.

Perron

(1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346. doi: 10.1093/biomet/75.2.335

42.

Raihan

(2008). Trade liberalization and poverty in Bangladesh (Macao Regional Knowledge Hub Working Paper No. 15). Bangkok: UN and ESCAP.

43.

Rajapatirana

(1989). Foreign trade and economic development: Sri Lanka’s experience. World Development, 16(10), 1143–1157.

44.

Ravinthirakumaran

(2014). Applicability of openness-led growth hypothesis in Sri Lanka. South Asia Economic Journal, 15(2), 241–263.

45.

Snodgrass

D.R.

(1998). The economic development of Sri Lanka: A tale of missed opportunities. In Rotberg

R.I.

(Ed.), Creating peace in Sri Lanka: Civil war and reconciliation. (pp. 89–107). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

46.

Tang

T.C.

(2002). Demand for M3 and expenditure components in Malaysia: Assessment from bounds testing approach. Applied Economics Letters, 9(11), 721–725.

47.

Tang

T.C.

Nair

(2002). A cointegration analysis of Malaysian import demand function: Reassessment from the bounds test. Applied Economics Letters, 9(5), 293–296.

48.

Tang

C.F.

Lai

Y.W.

(2011). The stability of exports-led growth hypothesis: Evidence from Asia’s four little dragons (MPRA Paper No. 27962). Munich: University Library of Munich.

49.

World Bank. (2005). The World Bank in Bangladesh. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/bd

50.

World Bank. (2013). World development indicators. The World Bank World Development Indicators. Retrieved 1 April 2013, from http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/variableSelection/selectvariables.aspx?source=world-development-indicators

51.

Young

(1995). The tyranny of numbers: Confronting the statistical realities of the East Asian growth experience. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 641–680.