This article empirically examines the determinants of trade development for South Asian countries over the period 1980–2010 using panel analysis. The result of unit root indicates that all the variables are appropriate for panel cointegration. The panel cointegration test reveals long-run relationship between trade ratio and its determinants. The panel fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) long-run coefficients indicate that per capita income growth, trade liberalization, human capital, financial and infrastructure development have played a major role in influencing trade growth in South Asia.
BaierS.L.BergstrandJ.H. (2001). The growth of world trade: Tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity. Journal of International Economics, 53(1), 1–27.
2.
BarroR.Sala-i-MartinX. (1995). Economic growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
BeckT. (2002). Financial development and international trade: Is there a link?Journal of International Economics, 57(1), 107–131.
4.
BlumB.S.GoldfarbA. (2006). Does the Internet defy the law of gravity?Journal of International Economics, 70(2), 384–405.
5.
ChuaS.Y.SharmaS.C. (1998). An investigation of the effects of prices and exchange rates on trade flows in East Asia. Asian Economic Journal, 12(3), 253–271.
6.
ClaridaH.R. (1994). Cointegration, aggregate consumption and the demand for imports: A structural econometric investigation. American Economic Review, 84(1), 298–308.
7.
De DiosL. (2009). The impact of information technology in trade facilitation on small and medium enterprises in the Philippines(ARTNeT Working Paper Series No 74, July)..
8.
FeenstraR.C. (1992). How costly is protectionism?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(3), 159–178.
9.
FeenstraR.C. (1998). Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 31–50.
10.
FrankelJ.RomerD. (1996). Trade and growth: An empirical investigation (Working Paper No. 5476).,Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
11.
FrankelJeffrey A. (1997). Regional trading blocs in the world trading system. Washington, DC: Institute of International Economics.
12.
FrankelJ.SteinE.WeiS.-J. (1998). Continental trading blocs: Are they natural or super-natural? In
FrankelJeffrey (Ed.), The regionalization of the world economy (pp. 91–120). The University of Chicago Press.
13.
GoswamiN. (in press). Role of trade openness and financial development in economic growth: Panel evidence from South Asia. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets.
14.
GrossmanG.HelpmanE. (1991). Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European Economic Review, 36(5), 237–267.
15.
HansbergE.R. (2005). A spatial theory of trade. American Economic Review, 95(5), 1464–1491.
16.
HelliwellJ. (1999). Language and trade. In
BretonA. (Ed.), Exploring the economics of language (pp. 5–26). Ottawa: Canadian Heritage.
17.
HelpmanE. (1987). Imperfect competition and international trade: Opening remarks. European Economic Review, 31(1–2), 77–81.
18.
HummelsD.LevinsohnJ. (1995). Monopolistic competition and international trade: Reconsidering the evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 799–836.
19.
HurJ.RajM.RiyantoY. (2006). Finance and trade: A cross-country empirical analysis on the impact of financial development and asset tangibility on international trade. World Development, 34(10), 1728–1741.
20.
KaoC.ChiangM.-H. (2000). On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated: Regression in panel data. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 179–222.
21.
KrugmanP.R. (1995). Growing world trade: Causes and consequences. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 26(1), 327–377.
22.
KrugmanP.R. (2002). Was it all in Ohlin? A centennial celebration. In
FindlayR. (Ed.), Ohlin, Bertil: A centennial celebration, 1899–1999. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
KatirciogluS.T.KahyalarN.BenarH. (2007). Financial development, trade and growth triangle: The case of India. International Journal of Social Economics, 34(9), 586–598.
24.
KumarN.SiddharthanN.S. (1994). Technology, firm size and export behaviour in developing countries: The case of Indian enterprises. The Journal of Development Studies, 31(2), 289–309.
25.
LaiH.ZhuS. (2004). The determinants of bilateral trade. Canadian Journal of Economics, 37(2), 459–483.
26.
LeamerE.LevinsohnJ. (1995). International trade theory: The evidence. In
GrossmanG.RogoK. (Eds), Handbook of international economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1339–1394). North-Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
27.
LeamerE.E. (1990). Latin American as a target for trade barriers erected by major developed countries in 1983. Journal of Development Economics, 32(2), 337–368.
28.
LeeJ.-W.SwagelP. (1997). Trade barriers and trade flows across countries and industries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(3), 372–382.
29.
LounganiP.ModyA.RazinA. (2002). The global disconnect: The role of transactional distance and scale economies in gravity equations. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 49(5), 526–543.
30.
PedroniP. (2000). Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics, 15, 93–130.
31.
PedroniP. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 3(3), 579–625.
32.
PesaranM. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.
33.
RomerP. (1994). New goods, old theory and the welfare cost of trade restrictions. Journal of Development Economics, 43(1), 5–38.
34.
RoseA. (2004). Do we really know that the WTO increases trade?American Economic Review, 94(1), 98–114.
35.
ShepherdS.B.WilsonJ.S. (2009). Trade facilitation in ASEAN member countries: Measuring progress and assessing priorities. Journal of Asian Economics, 20(4), 367–383.
36.
SrinivasanT.N.ArchanaVani (2009). India in the global and regional trade: Determinants of aggregate and bilateral trade flows and firms’ decision to export(ICRIER, Working Paper No. 232).
37.
SubramanianA.WeiS.-J. (2005). The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly. CEPR Discussion Papers 5122.
38.
SvalerydHelenaVlachosJonas (2002). Financial markets, industrial specialization and comparative advantage—Evidence from OECD countries. Research Papers in Economics, Stockholm University, Department of Economics.
39.
TangL. (2006). What accounts for the growth of trade in differentiated goods: Economic causes or technological imperatives?Economics Letters, 91(2), 204–209.
40.
TegeneA. (1991). Trade flows, relative prices, and effective exchange rates: A VAR on Ethiopian data. Applied Economics, 23(8), 1369–1375.
41.
UddinMd.G.S.ChakrabortyL. (2009). International trade, financial development and economic growth nexus in Bangladesh: Empirical evidence from time series approach. International Finance Conference, IIM Calcutta, 3–5December.
42.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development,2000; World Investment Report1999, Geneva: UNCTAD.
43.
VukšičG. (2005). Foreign direct investment and export performance of the transition countries in Central and Eastern Europe. Paper presented at the 12th Dubrovnik Economic Conference, organized by the Croatian National Bank.
44.
WilsonJ.S.MannC.L.OtsukiT. (2005). Assessing the benefits of trade facilitation: A global perspective. The World Economy, 28(6), 841–871.
45.
World Development Indicators (WDI) (2011). World Bank, Washington, DC.
46.
YangJ. (2009). Small and medium enterprises (SME) adjustments to information technology (IT) in trade facilitation The South Korean experience(ARTNeT Working Paper Series No 61).
47.
ZhangK.H. (2005). How does FDI affect a host country’s export performance? The case of China (Working paper Illinois State University). .
