South Asian Exchange Rates Regimes: Fixed,Flexible or Something In-between?

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the degree of de facto exchange rate flexibility in the exchange rate regimes for selected South Asian economies, viz., Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Three commonly employed measures of exchange rate classification are used: a simple exchange market pressure (EMP) measure, a GARCH specification and a regression-based model. The article finds strong evidence of limited flexibility in all the South Asian economies—particularly against the US dollar, which can suggest a heavy degree of currency management. While Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka effectively have fixed exchange rate regimes vis-à-vis the US dollar, India appears to operate somewhat more as a managed floater with a movement towards greater flexibility in recent years.

Keywords

Exchange rate regimes fixed flexible South Asia US dollar peg

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bayoumi

Eichengreen

(1998). Exchange rate volatility and intervention: Implications of the theory of optimum currency areas. Journal of International Economics, 45(2), 191–209.

Bubula

Ötker-Robe

(2002). The evolution of exchange rate regimes since 1990: Evidence from de facto policies. Working Paper No.02/155, IMF.

Cavoli

Rajan

R.S.

(2009). Exchange rate regimes and macroeconomic management in Asia. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Dominguez

K.M.

(1998). Central bank intervention and exchange rate volatility. Journal of International Money and Finance, 17(1), 161–190.

Frankel

Wei

S.J.

(1994). Yen bloc or dollar bloc? Exchange rate in the East Asian economies. In Ito

Krueger

(Eds), Macroeconomic linkage: Savings, exchange rates, and capital flows (pp. 295–329). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Frankel

Wei

S.J.

(2007). Estimation of de facto exchange rate regimes: Synthesis of the techniques for inferring flexibility and basket weights. IMF Annual Research Conference, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, 16 November.

Girton

Roper

(1977). A monetary model of exchange market pressure applied to the post-war Canadian experience. American Economic Review, 67(4), 537–548.

Guimãeres

R.F.

Karacagdag

(2004). The empirics of foreign exchange intervention in emerging market countries: The cases of Mexico and Turkey (Working Paper No. 04/123). Washington, DC: IMF.

Husain

(2005, October). Choosing the right exchange rate regime for Pakistan (Working Paper). Retrieved 1 March 2003, from http://www.sbp.org.pk/research/conf/session_iv_aasim-hussain.pdf

10.

Rajan

R.S.

Beverinotti

(2012) Real exchange rate undervaluation, resource allocation and East Asian growth. Journal of International Development, 24(4), 401–414.

11.

Rajan

R.S.

Gopalan

(2010). India’s international reserves—How large and how diversified? Global Economy Journal, 10(3), 1–16.

12.

Rodrik

(2010). Making room for China in the world economy. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 100(2), 89–93.

13.

Pentecost

E.J.

Van Hooydonk

Van Poeck

(2001). Measuring and estimating exchange market pressure in the EU. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(3), 401–418.

14.

Tanner

(2001). Exchange market pressure and monetary policy: Asia and Latin America in the 1990s. IMF Staff Papers, 47, pp. 311–333.