Low household expenditure on education compromises the learning and future labour market prospects of children. This study provides an empirical framework for determining the criteria that South Asian policy-makers can use for assisting households with educational expenditure. A case study of urban Bangladesh using tobit and hurdle regression models indicate that households in the bottom two per capita quartiles should receive priority as recipients of policy assistance. Other criteria include households with parents who have not completed primary schooling and households with boys, older children and multiple children of school-going age.
Arends-Kuenning, M. & Amin, S. (2004). School incentive programs and children’s activities: The case of Bangladesh. Comparative Education Review, 48(3), 295–317.
2.
Asadullah, M.N. (2006). Returns to education in Bangladesh. Education Economics, 14(4), 453–468.
3.
Aslam, M. & Kingdon, G. (2008). Gender and household education expenditure in Pakistan. Applied Economics, 40(20), 2573–2591.
4.
Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (2000). Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2000. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics in association with The World Bank. CD-ROM.
5.
Becker, G. (1991). The demand for children, in treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Cameron, A. Colin & Trivedi, Pravin (2009). Microeconometrics using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
7.
CAMPE (1999). Hope not complacency: State of primary education in Bangladesh. Dhaka, Bangladesh: The University Press Limited.
8.
Das, J. (2005). Reassessing conditional cash transfer programs. World Bank Research Observer, 20(1), 57–80.
9.
Deaton, A. (1997). The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
Glewwe, P. & Kremer, M. (2006). Schools, teachers, and education outcomes in developing countries. In Eric Hanushek & Finis Welch (Eds), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 2, pp. 945–1017). Amsterdam: North Holland.
11.
Halstead, J. Mark (2004). An Islamic concept of education. Comparative Education, 40(4), 517–529.
12.
Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.
13.
Kingdon, G. (2005). Where has all the bias gone? Detecting gender bias in the intrahousehold allocation of educational expenditure. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 53(2), 409–451.
14.
Ravallion, M. & Wodon, Q. (2000). Does child labor displace schooling? Evidence on behavioral responses to an enrollment subsidy. Economic Journal, 110(462), C158–C175.
15.
Schultz, T.P. (2004). School subsidies for the poor: Evaluating the Mexican Progresa Poverty Program. Journal of Development Economics, 74(1), 199–250.
16.
Shafiq, M. Najeeb (2009). A reversal of educational fortune? Educational gender gaps in Bangladesh. Journal of International Development, 21(1), 137–155.
17.
The World Bank (2000). Bangladesh education sector review. Dhaka, Bangladesh: The University Press Limited.
18.
The World Bank & Asian Development Bank (2003a). Poverty in Bangladesh: Building on progress. Dhaka, Bangladesh: The World Bank & Asian Development Bank.
19.
The World Bank & Asian Development Bank (2003b). Bangladesh: Public expenditure review. Dhaka, Bangladesh: World Bank & Asian Development Bank.
20.
Tsang, M. (1994). Cost analysis of educational inclusion of marginalized populations. Paris: IIEP, UNESCO.
