This article examines India's exports to the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries with a special focus on the influence of migration. In order to explain the growing orientation of India's exports towards the Gulf countries, we analyse the demand pattern of GCC as represented by its import structure. The GCC countries’ import structure reveals the influence of the Indian diaspora and the possible migration–trade link. The hypothesis of migration–trade nexus is further verified using a longitudinal gravity-type model. The econometric evidence also illustrates the strong immigrant preference effect for their home-country products. Thus, the preference similarity mechanism is seen to work in the India–GCC context despite the violation of its crucial assumption of income similarity. Overall, the study brings out the importance of migrant population as a unique source of advantage for India's exports to the region.
Alam, A. (1995), ‘ The New Trade Theory and its Relevance to the Trade Policies of Developing Countries ’, World Economy, 18 (3): 367–85 .
2.
Anderson, J.E. (1979), ‘ A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation ’, American Economic Review, 69 (1): 106–16 .
3.
Anderson, J.E. and Eric van, Wincoop (2003), ‘ Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle’, TheAmerican Economic Review, 93 (1): 170–92 .
4.
Batra, Amita (2004), ‘ India's Global Trade Potential: The Gravity Model Approach ’, Indian Council for Research on International Economic RelationsWorking Paper No. 151, December.
5.
Bergstrand, J.H. (1985), ‘ The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Micro Economic Foundations and Empirical Evidence ’, The Review of Economic and Statistics, 67 (3): 474–81 .
6.
Bhat, C.S. , K. Laxmi Narayan and Sadananda Sahoo (2002), ‘Indian Diaspora: A Brief Overview’, Occasional Paper-8, Centre for the Study of Indian Diaspora (CSID), University of Hyderabad .
7.
Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics (DGCIS), Monthly Statistics of Foreign Trade of India, Various Issues, Government of India, Kolkata , Vol. 1.
8.
Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics (DGCIS), Statistics of the Foreign Trade of India, Various Issues, Government of India, Kolkata , Vol. 1.
9.
Dunlevy, J. and W. Hutchinson (1999), ‘ The Impact of Immigration on American Import Trade in the Late Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries ’, Journal of Economic History, 59 (4): 1043–1062 .
10.
Edwards Economic Research Inc. (Canada) (2001), Middle East Economic Databook, Dubai: Motivate Publishing .
11.
Folke, S. , Niels Fold and Thyge Enevoldson (1993), South-South Trade and Development: Manufactures in the New International Division of Labour, International Political Economy Series. New York: St . Martin's Press.
12.
Girma, S. and Z. Yu (2002), ‘ The Link between Immigration and Trade: Evidence from the United Kingdom ’, Review of World Economics, 138 (1): 115–30 .
13.
Gould, D.M. (1994), ‘ Immigration Links to the Home Country-Empirical Implications for U.S. Bilateral Trade Flow ’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76 (2): 302–16 .
14.
Harilal, K.N. (2005), ‘The External Sector’, in Disequalising Growth, Alternative Economic Survey, India, 2004–2005, New Delhi: Danish Books .
15.
Head, K. and J. Ries (1998), ‘ Immigration and Trade Creation: Econometric Evidence from Canada ’, Canadian Journal of Economics,31 (1): 47–62 .
16.
IMF (Various Issue), Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbook, Washington: IMF .
17.
Lall, S. (1988), ‘Trade between Developing Countries’, in M. N. Soopie , B.A. Hamzah and C.H. Leong , (eds), Crisis and Response: The Challenge to South-South Economic Co-operation, pp. 119–35, Kuala Lumpur: Institute of Strategic and International Studies .
18.
Leamer, E.E. (1993), ‘ Factor-supply Differences as a Source of Comparative Advantage ’, American Economic Review, 83 (2): 436–39 .
19.
Leamer, Edward E. and Robert Stern (1970), Quantitative International Economics. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co .
20.
Light, Ivan (1985), ‘Ethnicity and Business Enterprises’, in Mark Stilarik and Murray Friedman (eds), Making it in America. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press .
21.
Light, Ivan and Edna Bonrich (1988), Emigrant Entrepreneurs. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press .
22.
Lundback, E.J. and J. Torstensson (1998), ‘ Demand, Comparative Advantage and Economic Geography in International Trade: Evidence from the OECD ’, Review of World Economics, 134 (2): 230–49 .
23.
Mathur, S.K. (1999), ‘ Pattern of International Trade, New Trade Theories and Evidence from Gravity Equation Analysis ’, Indian Economic Journal, 47 (4): 68–88 .
24.
Min, P.G. (1990), ‘ Korean Immigrants in Los Angeles ’, in Institute of Social Science Research, ISSR Working Papers, 2 (2), University of California, Los Angeles .
25.
Mohan, B. (1989), ‘ India-Gulf Trade Relations: A New Perspective ’, Foreign Trade Review, 24 (1): 127–35 .
26.
Paranjpe, V.M. (1950), ‘ India's Trade with the Middle East ’, RBI Bulletin, 4 (3): 147–53 .
27.
Parsan, E. (1993), South-South Trade in Global Development. Aldershot: Avebury .
28.
Poyhonen, Pentti (1963), ‘ A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries ’, Review of World Economics, Band 90, Heft 1, 93–100 .
29.
Razin, E. (1990), ‘ Immigrant Entrepreneurs in Israel, Canada and California ’, in Institute of Social Science Research, ISSR Working Papers, 5 (15), University of California, Los Angeles .
30.
Sharma, B.L. (1984), ‘ Preference Similarity Hypothesis: Survey and Further Empirical Evidence ’, The Indian Economic Journal, 31 (3): 79–96 .
31.
Tinbergen, Jan (1962), Shaping the World Economy: Suggestion for an International Economic Policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund .
32.
UNCTAD, Handbook of International Trade and Development Statistics, Various Issues. New York: United Nations .
33.
United Nations Statistics Division, Commodity Trade Statistics Database (COMTRADE).
34.
United Nations (Various Issues), International Trade Statistics Yearbook, Vol. 1, New York .
35.
Varadachary, T.R. (1973), ‘ Prospects of Indian Trade with South-East Asia and the Middle East ’, Prajnan, 2 (4): 417–26 .
36.
Wadhwa, C.D. and M.G. Asher (eds), (1985), ASEAN-South Asia Economic Relations, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore .
37.
Zachariah, K.C. , E.T. Mathew and S. Irudaya Rajan (1999), ‘Impact of Migration on Kerala's Economy and Society’, Centre for Development StudiesWorking Paper No. 297, Thiruvananthapuram .
