A sub-set of the costs and benefits of sub-national fiscal autonomy in federations is examined with the major focus being on road check-posts. The examination is done with reference to Indian states and using a partial equilibrium, diagrammatic analysis. Empirical analyses of the revenue impact of abolition of ‘fiscal frontiers’ in the European Union in 1993, and the revenue performance of the state of Maharashtra in India, which has no check-posts, relative to other Indian states, point to the preliminary conclusion that road check-posts have positive revenue benefits that cannot be made good by other, information based, enforcement mechanisms. Possible ways of mitigating road check-post costs are reviewed and some issues relating to fiscal barriers requiring further analysis are identified.
Apte, Pradeep and Arindam Das-Gupta (2002), ‘ Improving Maharashtra's Own Revenue Performance ’, report prepared for the World Bank. Mumbai: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.
2.
Bagchi, Amaresh (1996), ‘A State Level VAT? Harmonising Sales Taxes: A Comparison of India and Canada’, in Parthasarathi Shome (ed.), Value-Added Tax in India. New Delhi: Centax Publications .
3.
Bagchi, Amaresh (2002), ‘ Enforcing the Constitution's Common Market Mandate: Time to Invoke Article 307 ’, Economic and Political Weekly, 37, June 15: 2303–08 .
4.
Bird, Richard M. (1999), ‘ Rethinking Subnational Taxes—A New Look at Tax Assignment ’, Working Paper, Fiscal Affairs Department. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
5.
Chacholiades, Miltiades (1990), International Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill .
6.
Chang, Woon Nam , Andrea Gebauer and Rüdiger Parsche (2002), ‘ Is the Completion of EU Single Market Hindered by VAT Evasion? ’ CESifo Working Paper No. 974. Munich: Ifo Institute for Economic Research, available at www.CESifo.de.
7.
Cudmore, Edgar and John Whalley (2002), ‘ Border Delays and Trade Liberalization ’, Working Paper. London: University of Western Ontario.
8.
Das-Gupta, Arindam and Ira N. Gang (1996), ‘ A Comparison of Sales Taxes ’, Public Finance, 51: 217–25 .
9.
Debroy, Bibek and P.D. Kaushik (2002), ‘ Barriers to Inter-State Trade and Commerce—The Case of Road Transport, 2002 ’, Background Paper for the Commission for Contemporary Studies. New Delhi: Rajiv Gandhi Institute.
10.
Ebrill, Liam , Michael Keen , Jean-Paul Bodin and Victoria Summers (2001), The Modern VAT. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund .
11.
Empowered Committee of State Finance Ministers (2005), A White Paper on State-Level Value Added Tax. New Delhi: Ministry of Finance, Government of India .
12.
European Union (no date), ‘VIES, VAT Information Exchange System’, http:\\europa.eu.int\comm.\taxation_customs\databases\vies_en.htm (accessed October 2001).
13.
European Union (no date – b), ‘The Customs Policy of the European Union’, http:\\europa.eu.int\comm.\dg10\publications\brochures\move\douane\customs\txt_en.html#1 (accessed October 2001).
14.
Gandolfo, Giancarlo (1986), International Economics. Berlin: Springer Verlag .
15.
Government of Karnataka (2001), First Report of the Tax Reforms Commission (V. Moilly, Chairman). Bangalore: Finance Department, Government of Karnataka .
16.
Hitiris, Theo (1994), European Community Economics, Third Edition. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf .
17.
Hutchison, Ian (1996), ‘The Value-Added Tax Information Exchange System and Administrative Cooperation Between the Tax Authorities of the European Community’, in Glenn P. Jenkins (ed.), Information Technology and Innovation in Tax Administration, pp. 101–14. Amsterdam: Kluwer Law International .
18.
International Monetary Fund (various years), Government Finance Statistics. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund .
19.
International Monetary Fund (various years), International Financial Statistics (CD-ROM). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund .
20.
Kumar, Arvind (2002), ‘E-government in India’, slide presentation, http:\\www.dpsa.gov.za\SDILearning\LrngNtwksdocuments\SMS\2002\ (accessed June 2002).
21.
Low, Patrick (1995), ‘ Preshipment Inspection Services ’, World Bank Discussion Paper 278. Washington DC: World Bank.
22.
Ministry of Finance, Government of India (2002), Report of the Task Force on Indirect Taxes (Vijay Kelkar, Chairman). New Delhi: Ministry of Finance .
23.
Mintz, Jack and Henri Tulkens (1986), ‘ Commodity Tax Competition between Member States of a Federation: Equilibrium and Efficiency ’, Journal of Public Economics, 29: 133–92 .
24.
National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER) (1979), Road Transport Industry—A Review. New Delhi: NCAER .
25.
Oates, Wallace (1999), ‘ An Essay on Fiscal Federalism ’, Journal of Economic Literature, 37: 1120–49 .
26.
Pandey, Sanjay (2002), ‘ E-governance Totters in Gujarat ’, Times of India, July 22: 9 .
27.
Price Waterhouse (1996), ‘Customs and Fiscal Formalities at Frontiers, Summary’, The Single Market Review Series, Subseries III—Dismantling of Barriers. Available at http:\\europa.eu.int\comm\internal_market\studies\stud7.htm (accessed October 2001).
28.
Rao, M.G. and Nirvikar Singh (1998), ‘ The Assignment of Taxes and Expenditures in India ’, Working Paper. CREDPR, Davis: University of California.
29.
Reserve Bank of India (various years), RBI Bulletin. Mumbai: Reserve Bank of India .
30.
Rishikumar, V. (2002), ‘Artful Dodgers Can Be Stumped’, Hindu Business Line (Internet Edition), April 3, available at http:\\www.blonnet.com\ew\2002\04\03\stories.
31.
Transport Commissioner's Office, Maharashtra (2001), Motor Transport Statistics of Maharashtra, 2001. Mumbai: Transport Commissioner, Maharashtra .
32.
World Bank (2001), World Development Indicators, CD-ROM. Washington DC: World Bank .
