Crossing borders and moving frontiers: Coordinating European social security for modern cases of global mobility

Abstract

Modern cases of global mobility cause legal ambiguities as to which conflict rules to apply to govern the applicable social security legislation. Relevant to this end is the question of whether the situation is governed by the lex loci laboris principle, the posting provision, or the rules on normal work in two or more Member States under EC Regulation 883/2004. Each of these three legal mechanisms must be distinguished from each other. First, this article proposes a structure for handling such distinctions. Secondly, it discusses how these distinctions are made. It is concluded that the posting provision has a wide scope of applicability whereas the scope of applicability of the rules on normal work in two or more Member States has been narrowed. On the basis of the legal description, this article analyses a catalogue of standard cases of modern mobility for which it is not clear whether the posting rules or the rules on normal work in two or more Member States apply. As the tendency drives towards temporary global mobility setups, a starting point is that the posting rule applies. The article concludes that the current EU rules on the applicable social security legislation have substantial flexibility for managing new cases of global mobility.

Keywords

Applicable legislation cross-border work posting EU social security coordination free movement of workers telework business travel

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aceto

(2024) Cross-border workers - navigating the challenges of social security coordination rules in the era of telework in the European Union. European Labour Law Journal 15(2): 376–387.

Becker

(2021) Voraussetzungen der Entsendung im Lichte der Funktionsbedingungen von Sozialrechtsordnungen. Zeitschrift für Europäisches Sozial- und Arbeitsrecht 11-12: 467–476.

Cornelissen

Van Limberghen

(2023) A Plea for an Adaptation of the Conflict Rules in the EU Social Security Regulation. In: Pioneering social Europe: Liber Amicorum Herwig Verschueren. Brugge: Die Keure, 65–76.

De Pauw

Verschueren

(2023) The framework agreement on the applicable social security law in case of habitual cross-border telework after the pandemic. ERA Forum 24: 467–480.

De Wispelaere

Vukorepa

(2023) The EU Social Security Rules on Posting: Defining Problems and Potential Solutions. In: Research handbook on european social security law, 2nd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 225–251.

Eichenhofer

(2023) Sozialer Schutz bei Arbeit vom Homeoffice im Binnenmarkt. Zeitschrift für Europäisches Sozial- und Arbeitsrecht 9: 355–363.

Golynker

(2006) Ubiquitous citizens of Europe - the paradigm of partial migration. Antwerpen - Odford: Intersentia.

Jorens

(2022) Cross-border EU employment and its enforcement: an analysis of the labour and social security law aspects and a quest for solutions. Cham: Springer.

Konopásková

Sakslin

(2011) Modernised EU social security coordination - Follow-up report on the implementation of Regulations (EC) No 883/2004 and (EC) No 987/2009. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.

10.

Montebovi

(2023) Coordination Rules and New Forms of Labour and Reintegration. In: Pennings

Vonk

(eds) Research handbook on European social security law, 2n ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.266–285.

11.

Pennings

(2000) Regulation 1408/71 and the Room for Manipulation of the Facts. In: Numhauser Henning

(eds) Normativa Perspektiv. Festschrift till Anna Christensen. Lund: Juristförlaget i Lund, pp.347–372.

12.

Pennings

(2022) European social security law. Cambridge, UK: Intersentia.

13.

Pieters

Schoukens

Berghman

(2010) Social security, supplementary pensions and new patterns of work and mobility: researchers’ profiles. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.

14.

Preis U (ed) (2020) EU-Agenda. Zeitschrift für europäisches Sozial- und Arbeitsrecht 05/06: 189–194.

15.

Sarai

(2012) Arbeidsgiveravgift og grenseoverskridende arbeidsforhold. Oslo: Gyldendal Juridisk.

16.

Schoukens

(1997) Prospects of social security co-ordination. Leuven/Amersfoort: Acco.

17.

Schoukens

Everaet

(2023) Coordination, a reflection on telework in social security. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu / Collected Papers of Zagreb Law Faculty 73(2-3): 373–390.

18.

Schoukens

Pieters

(2009) The rules within regulation 883/2004 for determining the applicable legislation. European Journal of Social Security 11(1-2): 81–117.

19.

Spiegel

Rennuy

Weerepas

(2022) MoveS legal report: social security and tax law. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.

20.

Van Der Mei

(2017) Overview of recent cases before the court of justice of the european union (April-September 2017). European Journal of Social Security 19(4): 353–362.

21.

Van Der Mei

Van Ooij

(2021) The judicial Finetuning of the eu rules determining the applicable social security legislation. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 29(1): 132–155.

22.

Verschueren

(2022) The application of the conflict rules of the european social security coordination to telework during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Social Security 24(2): 79–94.