Environmentally friendly and socially responsible investment in and by occupational pension funds in the USA and in the EU

Abstract

Worldwide pension funds, in their capacity as large institutional investors, are under increasing pressure to take social and environmental considerations into account in their investment decision-making process. The concepts Socially Responsible Investment (SRI) and Environmental Social Governance (ESG) are indeed ubiquitous in the current investment and pension community. This article aims to provide some insight into the conceptual relationship between SRI and ESG and its legal implications for the investment behaviour of private pension funds in the USA and the EU. Hence, the first part of the article gives some background to the distinct concepts of SRI and ESG. This leads to the finding that SRI goes one step further than ESG by prioritising moral or ethical considerations that may not be material to an investment’s financial performance, whereas ESG functions as a guideline to enhance financial performance. The second part analyses the legal possibilities and constraints for responsible investment in American occupational pensions and the third part does the same for European occupational pensions. The article concludes with a summary and comparative overview of the American and European lessons.

Keywords

ESG SRI pensions sustainable investments responsible investments environmental social governance socially responsible investment ERISA

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Autenne

(2020) Sustainable investments for Sustainable Pensions. In: Bouthinon-Dumas

François

Muller

(eds) Finance durable et droit: perspectives comparées. Paris: IRJS Editions, pp. 1–18.

EBA, ESMA and EIOPA (2021), Final Report on draft Regulatory Technical Standards. Available at: https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/jc_2021_03_joint_esas_final_report_on_rts_under_sfdr.pdf > accessed 20 May 2021.

EIOPA (2019) Opinion on the supervision of the management of environmental, social and governance risks faced by Institutions for Occupational Retirement Provision. Available at: <https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/content/opinion-supervision-management-environmental-social-and-governance-risks-faced-iorps.> accessed 27 December 2020.

Employee Benefits and Security Administration (2021), U.S. Department of Labor Statement regarding enforcement of its final rules on ESG investments and proxy voting by employee benefits plans. Available at: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ebsa/laws-and-regulations/laws/erisa/statement-on-enforcement-of-final-rules-on-esg-investments-and-proxy-voting.pdf > accessed 11 March 2021.

Feuer

(2019) Ethics, ESG, and ERISA: Ethical-Factor Investing of Savings and Retirement Benefits - Part I. 47 Comp. Plan. J. 212–222 (available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3501203).

Hylton

(1992) Socially responsible investing: doing good versus doing well in an inefficient market. American University Law Review. 1–52.

Kozak

(2010) Employee Benefit Plans, Durham: Carolina Academic Press.

Langbein

Posner

(1980) Social Investing and the Law of Trusts. Michigan Law Review. 72–112.

Langbein

Pratt

Stabile

Stumpff

(2015) Pension and Employee Benefit Law. Sixth Edition. Foundation Press.

10.

Muir

(2020) Fiduciary Obligations for Environmental, Social and Governance Investments: The Challenge of Climate Change. New York University Review of Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation. LexisNexis.

11.

Richardson

(2007) Do the Fiduciary Duties of Pension Funds Hinder Socially Responsible Investment?. Banking & Finance Law Review. 145–201.

12.

Richardson

(2008a) Keeping Ethical Investment Ethical: Regulatory Issues for Investing for Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics. 555–572.

13.

Richardson

(2008b) Putting ethics into Environmental Law: Fiduciary Duties for Ethical Investment. Osgoode Hall Law Journal. 243–291.

14.

Richardson

(2009) Climate Finance and its Governance: Moving to a Low Carbon Economy through Socially Responsible Financing?. International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 597–626.

15.

Sandberg

(2010) Socially Responsible Investment and Fiduciary Duty: Putting the Freshfields Report into Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. 143–162.

16.

Schanzenbach

Sitkoff

(2020) Reconciling Fiduciary Duty and Social Conscience: The Law and Economics of ESG Investing by a Trustee. Stanford Law Review. 381.

17.

Schewmaker

Lewis

(2019) The complete QDRO handbook: dividing ERISA, military, and civil service pensions and collecting child support from employee benefit plans. ABA Publishing.

18.

Serota

Brodie

(2006) ERISA Fiduciary Law. Washington: BNA Books.

19.

UNEP

(2005) A legal framework for the integration of environmental, social and governance issues into institutional investment. Available at https://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/documents/freshfields_legal_resp_20051123.pdf. > accessed 11 March 2021.

20.

UNEP

(2015) Fiduciary Duty in the 21st Century. Available at: https://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/documents/fiduciary_duty_21st_century.pdf. > accessed 11 March 2021.

21.

Wagner

(1997) The Trust Handbook, Cincinnati: National Underwriter.